Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ever used Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance (Alex Lawrie)?


lynnmarie6
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

LLoyds TSB commercial Finance is a factoring company to aid business cashflow. They used to be known as Alex Lawrie.

 

Has anyone had experiences of claiming against a banks factoring company as we are now in the process of going to court because they are suing us for a £30,000 guarantee/idemnity - even though our company went into liquidation over a year ago and the debts are owed by our ex-customers. But the factoring company have chosen NOT to chase the money in from the customers and have instead decided to claim from us after unfairly waiting 13 months to do so!

 

Because we were mislead and they broke terms and conditions we are counter claiming against them, after speaking to a solictor.

 

This is all very stressful and we are not sure we will win.

Has anyone had experience of this before? Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Something of a different subject this is, no doubt a few are looking for answers.

 

Ok, you had a factoring agreement and presumably, from what you have posted, you signed a personal indemnity/guarantee.

 

Under that indemnity, they are now claiming against you for £30K that they have not recovered.

 

Am I correct so far?

 

If so..

 

Next you say, you were misled and that they broke the T&C's, so you have counterclaimed, would you like to expand upon this at all?

Read, Read and Read some more.

 

The answers are all out there...

 

By the way, it's your claim. I only offer an opinion as another reader. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the t&c's of a factoring agreement the money is loaned against the invoice debt ( normally 80% debt value ). Depending on what type of factoring you have chosen either you or the company chase payment and then the remainder of the money becomes available ( 20% )when that is cleared. If the company that owes the money disputes the amount, the factoring company take it back, if the debt goes beyond an agreed period ( 90 days is usual ), they take it back and if the company refuse to pay for any reason, then the factoring company take it back.

 

Sorry to say, but it doesn't look like you have much hope. Why wasn't the money forthcoming from the debtor? Wouldn't you be better off chasing them if they owe the money?

 

I also don't think you would have much luck claiming the charge for the bacs payments if you went for the same day option as they can prove that manual intervention was used, which is a shame because factoring cost me thousands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for your replies. I am not used to this forum so I presume I am replying to both of you?!

 

Reply to gary67 and aqua2

Ok, this is quite complex but I will try to explain -

Yes Lloyds Commercial Finance meant we were paid 85% of the invoice up front and if after 120 days the customer had not paid the bill then the money was taken back. We are NOT claiming for any 'bank charges' as such and we opted for Bacs or Chaps payments.

 

We also cannot chase the customers direct as unfortunately our LTD printing business went into liquidation in Jan 2006 so we are not permitted to have any contact. Once the customers got wind of our liquidation they then started to plead that jobs were delivered sub-standard or not delivered at all - which is not true and we have proof of this!

 

Problem is that after 14 months of the factoring company saying they will get the money in (which only 85% is theirs, the rest ours) they have not chased sufficiently and have instead come after us for the money after all this time as we signed a guarantee! But how can this be fair after all this time. If we now buy the debt back from the bank we have little chance of recovering the debts from the customers after all this time.

 

I would not reccomend factoring for ANY business as it does cost you lots of money and I really just wanted to find out about anyone else's experiences. I think the banks try to sell this product mainly to printers, couriers and recruitment companies to ease cashflow and to avoid an overdraft facility. By the sound of it gary67 you lost money too - which factoring company was it through if you don't mind me asking?

 

Here are a few other things we believe they did wrong:-

1. They did not explain to us that we were signing a 'guarantee' and we were not advised to seek legal advice, which is normal practice when signing such documentation.

2. We did not want the service but our Lloyds bank manager refused us an overdraft and advised against a bank loan and we felt 'pushed' into factoring as our only option. The bank manager obviously gained commission.

3. We were told by the 'sales rep' that ALL invoices would be paid at 85% - but this was not true because we only had half dozen customers spending between £10-£30k per month and as soon as we signed up the factoring company capped them all at £5k! So the factoring served us no purpose and we soon needed an overdraft but were refused by the bank because they do not give out this service when you are already factoring.

So we cancelled the factoring and were told it would take 3 months. In this time they raised the capping amount so we stayed with them.

4. The factoring company were funding one customer who they mistakenly took to be a Ltd company with a winding up order and overnight they withdrew £30k of our funding. They were wrong as the customer we used was a 'partnership' - yet we were not refunded our money and lost the customer becasue of this. Ad you can imagine it put a massive dent in our cashflow.

 

After 120 days the factoring company should recall the money not paid by the customers - yet this was not done. They surely cannot get away with holding onto the debt for over 14 months and then chase us - we must have some rights. And remember this is NOT our debt - all the customers received good quality printing goods and because they have not paid for the work - we are being made to suffer. If we loose the court case we will loose our family home!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expected this one to be complex, so first thing is try and simplify your arguments...

 

We also cannot chase the customers direct as unfortunately our LTD printing business went into liquidation in Jan 2006 so we are not permitted to have any contact.

Ok, effectively any money owed the company has to go to the liquidators, but who is the money owed to, presumably the factoring company have paid the company, so the debt is owed to them. This suggests that if you buy the debt from the factoring co, you can then chase that debt.

 

...delivered sub-standard or not delivered at all - which is not true and we have proof of this!

Can you definitely prove that the jobs were supplied in accordance with the sales orders, including documents etc.

...they have not chased sufficiently

 

Can you show this to be the case, i.e. by picking certain jobs that you have all the documents and evidence of, that should have been paid, but where the factors have not recovered the amounts.

 

...as we signed a guarantee!

 

So it was a personal guarantee and therefore they are asking you personally for any shortfall.

 

They did not explain to us that we were signing a 'guarantee'

 

Unfortunately, I dont know if they legally have to explain this, or whether the document you sign is sufficient.

 

However, as the guarantee part of the document is with an individual, I wonder if it classes as a consumer contract? If it does, it may be worthwhile looking at the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts

 

...felt 'pushed' into factoring

 

I can fully understand that, but as this was a commercial agreement, there is little protection for you.

 

We were told by the 'sales rep'...

 

Do you have any evidence to show that the sales rep misrepresented, the service they were going to provide?

 

...funding one customer who they mistakenly took to be a Ltd company

 

Is there evidence to show that it was their mistake and did they fail to recover sums due from that customer?

 

 

It seems obvious from what you have written that you have been treated unfairly, but regrettably that can be the business world for you.

 

Essentially, what I am trying to do above, is get you to move your focus away from the feelings of upset and more towards finding specific legal arguments, that you can physically prove in front of a judge if needs be.

 

At the moment, things seem to hang on a possible misrepresentation, their failure to provide the service agreed, and/or their negligence in carrying out their duties.

Read, Read and Read some more.

 

The answers are all out there...

 

By the way, it's your claim. I only offer an opinion as another reader. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, bad memories of factoring. I had a rapidly expanding company and was owed many thousands in unpaid invoices. Most of the companies were known to my local bank and all paid on time, but Lloyds refused to increase the overdraft, even for just 6 weeks and went to work talking us into factoring. I can only guess the commission would be huge as three Lloyds representatives turned up for the meeting. Alex Lawrie was very expensive and we looked into other factoring companies and came up with Close Invoice Finance, which was still expensive but cheaper than Lloyds by around 1% a month. As you can imagine Lloyds were not happy we decided on using someone else and made life even more difficult. To give you an idea I phoned lloyds many times during the 3 years we factored to say XX thousand pounds is being sent by CHAPS today so you will get the money at 3 o'clock this afternoon so don't bounce any cheques or D/D's, only to be told they had no prove that the money was coming so tough and bounced away to there hearts content, racking up the charges. I was told on many occasions that if we changed to AL then they would be able to help us more as they would be able to see what was due in.

 

It cost us nearly 10k to get out of factoring, and god knows how much in charges over the years, shame it isn't claimable, especially as CHAPS payments were £25-30 a time.

 

We went for the "chase the money ourselves" option because we learnt very early on the factoring companies have no interest in getting the money in as all the time the debt is owed you are paying them interest.

 

Sorry I have gone off topic, its the first time I have seen factoring mentioned on here and given me a chance to rant, in short I would never recommend it, I never expected the overdraft to be taken away because we were factoring, and at times 80% of invoice just wasn't enough, you were lucky to get 85%.

 

Back to your original question though, it does seem odd that AL are now chasing you for the unpaid monies, I can only imagine with what you were going through that you presumed AL had been paid and the whole matter was settled. It seems unfair that they have waited this long, and by now the debtors have thanked there lucky stars for the 'free' work that was done for them.

 

Who should have been responsible for getting the invoices paid, you or AL? Even if it was AL they would have washed there hands of it once the money had been taken back ( from other invoiced work, in my experience ) and left you truly scuppered.

 

Once in this situation there really is no way out as the bank won't help because you are factoring therefore they say you do not need an overdraft or loan, I read somewhere that a high proportion of companies that factor go bust within 3 years. We didn't go bust, but sold the house and paid off most of the debts and literally started again. Most of our problems really kicked in when we started factoring, it just never worked the way it was supposed to, cost a lot more than we imagined and were left stumped when out of the blue they withdrew certain customers and 'capped' others. To be honest, I never actually got my head around what the hell was going on. Sometimes when I was expecting thousands there was nothing, other times money appeared on one customer because someone else had paid bring us back under the funding limit. An awful, expensive & frustrating time.

 

In hindsight we should never have factored, we were pressured into it by Lloyds when a simple loan or overdraft would have been sufficient. The cycle seems to be- overdraft, loan to pay off overdraft, overdraft, bigger loan to pay off existing loan and overdraft and then factoring.

 

I would suggest that factoring bears no risk to the banks whatsoever because if one company goes into default they simply take the owed money from your latest batch of invoices.

 

I can't help thinking either AL or the liquidators should have chased this money a long time ago, it seems most unjust to me that they should bring this all up again.

 

So sorry at your predicament, just hope someone on here can think of a solution for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many, many thanks for your replies.

 

We are determined to go to court with all the evidence we have and just basically cross our fingers that things go our way - or at least get treated fairly.

 

We will let you know of the outcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very sorry to hear what you are going through. Unfortunately I am not at all surprised. Factoring is very very seldom any good for anybody apart from the banks. You are right in your analysis of overdraft, loan, factoring etc. You are also right on the commision concerns that you have. When I had a working relationship with LTSB Commercial Finance I was offered by my then account manager a commision of £1,000 for any lead that I may give him that eventually signed up for their 'service' - regardless of their turnover on the new account.

 

These companies are feeding on the small businesses and entrepeneurial spirit that this country thrives on and in hand with their high street banking brothers systematically ruining it.

 

Good luck with your claim - please keep us posted here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...