Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dunno you've not scanned up what you've had before how can we tell?  
    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

No AQ - Straight to PRE TRIAL REVIEW


oyster11
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

 

hmmm Castle

 

I think you will get a lot better response if you try sending a version of Lateralus's letter to your own solicitor.

 

I seemed to have missed this "letter to you own solicitor" thing I don't ave one I didn't think I needed 1:eek:

 

Oyster

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think pete was telling someone from another forum to send a letter to that bank's solicitor

boy, things do get confusing around here, don't they?

you don't need a solicitor - just your own good mind and determination and you will succeed. and we are all here to help -

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this thread and Latties are attracting a lot of interest from other forums and I for one think that is good, it expands our experience but keeps all the information in one place (ok two lol) I was answering yankee bloke who said he was Woolwich and Barclays, they will have different solicitors.

 

Gawd there will be quite a crowd at Cambridge Court on the 13th July, maybe we should all go and have a party

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers latte,

 

Yep it does get little confusing.

 

.... and then there were three yankee_bloke oyster smellipants I think this could be the start of one of those internet born film, like Snakes on the Plane.

 

Oh look two more on the 13th now its the famous five!! lol

 

Looks like a party on the 13th at Cambridge then !!!!

 

Oyster

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Netty

 

Ya canny beat a good ole knees up can ya, hey it is a Friday after all!!!!

 

Lattie - I hope you don't mind put a post in the LTSB forum to yer

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!! in particular to the first thread with the draft letter on it and suggested the sent it every couple of weeks

 

 

Oyster

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't mind at all - after that little argy-bargy on that thread when someone told the other forum users to get back to their own forums - making some feel they weren't welcome - i left pete to sort them all out - but i think - hey - if it helps - put it anyplace! i'm an equal opportunity poster!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen the state of Netties hair....that is where the hat comes in!!!! :lol: :lol:

 

Oi!!!! you think i should buy a mirror with either claim one or claim two hahaha

or maybe i should wait - get the hat, and buy the mirror with claim 3!!!

i love this site:D

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gawd Netty

 

How many claims ave you got? I Know you can buy us all hats!!! icon3.gif:lol:

 

And one for Uncle Colin yes- that's the pointy one with the Big "D" on it !!:razz:

 

Oyster

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

difference is... uncle colin will be standing in a corner and you won't notice the 'D'. me now..... in the middle of the dance floor with the latest trendy hat.. courtesy of hsbc. hey oyster, have you not noticed the lifesize posters outside every branch of hsbc of me... wearing a hat with 'don't mess with me hsbc'???? lol

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it...GMM that's why I am still up when I normally in Bed @10

I will go for the second one it's just so much more shazam!!

 

 

 

OYSTER

 

 

 

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Peeps,

 

Heads up at the Lloyd's section - socrates333 has a PTR on the 7th June Question about additional charges after LBA.

 

Be worth Keeping and eye on it

 

Oyster

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Peeps

 

I have tried to get my signature to show on the posts, its all there its even there when I click the preview there are two submit thread i select the one below "Additional options"

 

Do the Mods ave to approve it first

 

let me Know

 

 

BTW - Do you like my little Man!!!!

 

Oyster

 

;)

  • Haha 1

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

MCOL Filed 26th Feb 07

:-)

Defended 26th March 07:rolleyes:

PRT @ Cambridge 13th July 07:wink:

1st May Full Offer:grin:

Cheque arrived 16th May8)

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...