Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ntl Complaints


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Having been a customer of BT for over 25 years when I moved I thoughts I'd take money management and save money with NTL.

 

When I took on the service I was assured that in the case that I moved I would not be held to the years contract if it wasnt possible for any reason (including moving into temp accommodation) I would not be held to the 1 years contract and there would be no penalties. This was important as I only had a 6 month rental agreement and was getting married to an Australian and may move countries.

 

Away its now 8 months on and I am moving due to the landlady needing to sell, I am moving in with friends and the short term and so have no need for the NTL line. When I contacted them to disconnect they informed me I was liable for the year and that I could if I wanted to have a refund from them for the remainder 3 months when I would not be using the service for up to 2 years when I reconnected with them. I was extremely annoyed and when I asked for the name of the person who sold me the line was told that there isnt that information available and I would never have been told this. So he was basically calling me a liar. He then went on to say that I should record conversations with people so I would have proof. I asked him to hold a second whilst I started to record our conversation at which point he said I am putting you through to customer services and our conversation is over.

 

When he put me through after holding for about 15 mins the lady at the other end was extremely unhelpful and would not pass me on to her manager and gave me a nameless customer complaint address to write to.

 

I believe they have mis-sold me the service and have complained to Ofcom.

 

Speaking at 3 other people who have taken on services with Ntl now Virginmedia - I was informed all had an issue and have moved to BT.

 

These involved:

 

- being disconnected whilst on calls

- trying to get through in the first place often 15- 20 mins waiting time

- being hung up on

- rude and unhelpful staff

 

I have had all the above problems in the past, but given this issue now have decided that under no circumstances will I use NTL in the future.

 

Can anyone who has had isssues reply, it would perhaps help resolve this one.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it's all Virgin now. The 12 month minimum contract is standard (unless you were on a 'student' deal which covers a reduced period) this can be useful as you could try to get them to put you on this and reduce the minimum term. Of all the complaints you mentioned, NTL/Virgin don;t have a monopoly on bad service or rude staff, so there's little point in making a declaration of unhappiness, you've only got 2 choices (1 if you live in Hull) so there's not much anyone can do.

 

As to your minimum term assurance, can you back this up in any way? Or did you note this when you returned the signed contract? IF you did, there is no problem, refer them to it. IF you didn't, then you agreed to their terms, irrespective of what the salesman said on the phone (unless you recorded it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The twelve months contracts are worthless, I found success with well I'm leaving on X date so if you want the box etc...

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi purplekim

 

"when I asked for the name of the person who sold me the line was told that there isnt that information available and I would never have been told this"

 

Being an ex NTL employee (Networks thank god, not CS) the amount of times customers complained about this very same thing that happened to you is scary!

 

Sales think they're a law unto themsleves and will tell you anything you want to hear if it gets them a sale and thus commission!

 

However, as for there being no record of the salesperson, what a load of bull! They will be a footprint in whichever billing system you're on left by the salesperson!

 

Now if its the DTV service you're trying to cancel you may be in luck. Since Virgin Media (NTL/Telewest rebranded) have dropped certain SKy channels I believe you can quote the T & C and get out of the contract penalty free..

 

Read through some of the threads here for more info: Cable Forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buzby you miss my point! first of indebtstudent is far from my name or a description of my circumstances. It's a name which bears no relation for the simple reason that I do not wish to be identified being a Nationwide employee and all.

 

My point was that the whole 12 month contract line is, when questioned, a load of rubbish. They insist YOU MUST pay but if you stand your ground they back down. It's a little like banks selling stuff to people and capitalising on thier ignorance of the way financial products work.

 

Furthermore in this case the member contends that she is mislead which gives even more reason to be firm with them as it is hardly her fault.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, as for there being no record of the salesperson, what a load of bull! They will be a footprint in whichever billing system you're on left by the salesperson!

 

I do believe they meant the information was available, but the information would not be disclosed to the customer. My NTL SAR had all the name details blanked off so I could not identify staff directly, with others it was a reference code that identified the agent, so should further identification be required, then Virgin would be in a position to pursue the matter, so it really isnt a 'big' deal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My point was that the whole 12 month contract line is, when questioned, a load of rubbish.

 

I can;t see why you feel this is the case - the contract is clearly for 12 months minimum term, it always has been. Negotiation may be possible, but it at the discretion of the company and not a 'right', so bearing in mind the horrors if these casual 'defaults', it is better not to play fast an loose. As to it being mis-sold - then evidence that the OP didn't enter into a 12 month contract would been to be proffered in support of the assertion - surely that would be easy enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can;t see why you feel this is the case - the contract is clearly for 12 months minimum term, it always has been.

 

If I cancel during the first 12 months, I'm not paying them for the remainder. Look at it the other way - if they decided to withdraw service during the first 12 months, they wouldn't pay me for the remaining months, so I don't see why I should pay them.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder why you'd agree to a contract if you've no intention of keeping to your agreement. Following this logic I suppose you feel a Marriage Contract can be treated with the same disregard?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a question you should be asking VM, not me. For the last three months, they've been billing me for a service they've not provided. When I pull out in June, it will be they who pay me for the outstanding period, if at all.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Virgin lets customers out of contracts

Virgin lets customers out of contracts

 

''Another report on this subject''

 

Virgin Media will allow customers in to cease subscribing to the company's services and switch to another provider even if they are locked into a contract.

 

The announcement comes after the National Consumer Council, which has statutory powers to alert regulators to issues it deems to be contrary to the interests of consumers, threatened to intervene in the ongoing carriage dispute between Virgin and Sky. This afternoon, Virgin said that it "strongly" agreed with the NCC's assertion that "there are flaws in the UK pay TV market which are harming the interests of consumers," and added that "an investigation is warranted."

 

The company emphasised that "the withdrawal of Sky's basic channels does not breach our agreement with customers" but said that it will allow customers to cancel their contracts "at any time up to the end of March."

 

"Virgin Media wants to do the right thing by its customers and resolve this dispute, as well as its underlying causes," said Virgin Media CEO Steve Burch. "We think our customers will quickly recognise that the improvements we've recently made to our TV service, together with other exciting enhancements we've got in the pipeline, make Virgin Media's TV service the most comprehensive and exciting in the UK. Over the next month, however, if they don't agree, we will not use technical legalities to stand in the way of them switching to another service. Among both our customers and the public as a whole, we believe there is a significant groundswell of support for our decision to stand up to Sky: we are determined to ensure it is the customer that benefits from our determination to do so."

 

Virgin have also announced that a "major movie promotion" will be made available to existing TV customers "to address any concern over the loss of Sky's channels."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, not got much time so ill give you your answer and my story as quick as poss.

 

~NTL

signed up with ntl, explained im on a 6 month rental agreement so i may be moving, they said it was fine i can take it with me free, i explained i may be moving to a non ntl cabled area they said then the contract will be cancelled. anyways i moved got chased for £180 6 months contract for ever and a day, nobody would help just got passed person to person

 

anyway how i sorted it. on the back of the bill is a number for ofcom i phoned and told my problem they gave me an address to write to, i didnt bother just phoned back a couple of weeks later and told them id had no reply the lady at ofcom gave me a magic super customer complaints number for ntl where i got straight to a lady who said "o yeah your right , there you go ive credited your account with £180 you dont owe anything any more bye" sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

"My point was that the whole 12 month contract line is, when questioned, a load of rubbish."

 

Who cares if I'm depending on thier goodwill? The point is if you insist they give in.

 

Re above post I believe that offer ran out at the end of March. Trouble is people like me have been too busy to contact them but then I don't want to leave anyway.

 

Anyway we have highlighted another get out say you're moving to another area where you cannot get thier services.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Development: Turns out the reason I was getting silly error messages from my Vbox is because my account has been in arrears for four months (with a current balance of over £60CREDIT), and they have decided to terminate my service after 6 months. More on this story later in our main bulletin.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...