Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Red's Wife vs Abbey


redstef
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am pursuing barclays, but my wife has a gripe to the tune of £807 plus interest of £137 with Abbey. We have found this out via her full 6 years worth of statements and have sent the LBA. This has crossed in the post with an offer of £235. The letter does not state that it is full and final just...... "I'm sorry that you are unhappy with the charges & I understand that would like these refunded. Although the charges are correct, as a goodwill gesture, I am happy to cancel £235. Your account will be updated within the next 10 days". Do we now send (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html#post531029)

to Abbey or ignore it and carry on regardless?

 

Red

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally got round to writing the rebuttal....

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated 20th March 29, 2007, outlining that you can not agree to refund all of my charges. However as a gesture of goodwill you will happily refund £235.

For this I am grateful but I must advise you that I am unable to accept the £235 as a final offer and would be continuing with my claim to reclaim the charges to my account over the last 6 years. I will therefore deduct the refund of £300 from my claim form.

 

In my letter of the 19th March 2007 I outlined my current claim is of £807.50 plus £137.48, which you have charged me in overdraft interest. This total is £944.98, however if you repay me the remaining £709.98 before 2nd April 2007, a full 14 days from my last letter, I will therefore not require to file a claim through the official channels of Her Majesty’s Court Service.

 

I look forward to hearing from you, and in a manner which I hope will resolve this issue without the need to escalate further,

 

 

Look OK?

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, some suggestions :

1st para. delete "happily" or were you being ironic !! Also, check your statement - usually, the refunds total a different amount to the GOGW in their letter. Change the numbers in para 3 if they did that to you too.

2nd para. delete "For this I am grateful, " What you really mean is "I'm surprised that you're offering anything if you're so sure of your legal position," [although I'm not suggesting you actually write that LOL]

suggest you don't say "unable to accept". Either say "I reject" or "I accept in partial settlement".

suggest you add ".... unless you disclose information, previously requested, which will counter my assertion that your default charges are disproportionate to your actual costs relating to my breaches." They won't, but it will look better downstream (esp Court Bundle).

HTH. Regards, Mad Nick

Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Mad Nick,

Thanks for that, especially like the "..disclose.." bit. Changes made and in the post tomorrow,

 

Red

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We have finally got around to filing with MCOL, and have just recieved the Issue Notice, which states that Abbey will be deemed as served on 30th May. I was just wondering what people thought about the Abbey and their procedures for dealing with claims. I achieved my result with Barclays, but some of the threads on Abbey seem to have a "different" feel about them. Just seems a little more intent on the Law. Only thinking out loud

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

We have just received our Notice of Transfer of Proceedings, and thankfully, the AQ has been dispensed with. I previously sent (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-765132.html) for my Barclays claim, and I was wondering if people advise the same treatment for Abbey?

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have just received notice of our Court appearance on the 20th August! It seems as though Winchester are really gunning for the Banks and speeding them through. What do people think now, should I call the Banks Solicitors ( we still don't know formally who is dealing with the claim at Abbey ) and see if they want my Court Bundle? Just wondering if that is a tactic people have used to speed settlement.

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know the contact details for Abbey's Solicitors? Thinking of giving them a ring...

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, did you check that they actually deposited the money into your account? When they file the defence, the phone number should be on there

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Lula, My wife has just assumed that they have paid the full amount, but she is just checking. The defense lists the Triton Square address and my named paralegal is Juan Sedano. Is that the usual contact info?

Stef

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They did pay the full amount £60+ 5x£35=235

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just preparing my Court Bundle and was wondering why the Abbey bundle is sooo much bigger that the Basic Bundle. Does anyone know the reason why? I'm currently up tp 128 pages without T&Cs, correspondence and statements!

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't locate the T&Cs for 1998 :-( . I have followed Gary H's suggestion for the Court Bundle and some of the Witness statement refers to the T&Cs. Will it matter if I don't include the Witness Statement or the T&Cs ?

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Include a set from any year which your account has been open. Ideally 2002 or 2004 as thats the ones referenced in the witness statement.

 

Icy's right that T&C's aren't crucial with Abbey - becouse they admit a breach anyway. Having said that, if your bringing any claim to court based in contract then you as the claimant should provide the contractual document you rely on.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

We submitted the bundle within limits, but as we have been on holiday, we missed the day that Abbey should have furnished us with their Bundle. On our return all we had was a lovely letter from Abbey stating that they are requesting a Stay ( we are at Winchester) but we haven't heard a dickie bird from the Court. We a due in Court on the 20th August, so if the Court doesn't agree to the Stay can we apply to the Court to make a decision on Abbey's failure to comply? Is there any letters etc that people know of?

Regards, Stef

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

send this letter of recorded tomorrow and copy to the court, both recorded, you could also email it for quickness also and just make a mention of the fact that you will be sending a hard copy

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

[You] –v- Abbey Plc

Claim No: ********

 

I write in relation to the claim as detailed above, and specifically the order made by District Judge ******* dated [date].

 

You were ordered by the court to by [date] file and serve the documents upon which your client intends to rely at the forthcoming hearing. For your reference, a copy of the order to which I refer is enclosed with this letter.

 

To date I have received no such documents and accordingly you are now in breach of the aforementioned court order.

 

Please note that the evidence upon which I intend to rely was both filed and served pursuant to the order of the court on [date].

 

Your non-compliance creates a significant imbalance between the parties in light of the forthcoming hearing, which is contrary to the overriding objective. This imbalance is particularly exacerbated by the fact that you are specialist solicitors representing a powerful financial institution, whereas I am a litigant in person. I feel that your litigation should be conducted in a professional manner befitting of such a prestigious organisation.

 

In view of the above, I will request at the hearing that the District Judge gives consideration to whether your client's defence should be struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)© and/or (b).

 

Please reply at your earliest conveniance explaining why you have not served the documents as ordered and stating by when I can expect to receive them, or alternatively, indicating that you wish to settle these matters without the need for a hearing.

 

I look forward to your prompt response.

 

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to the Winchester County Court and lo and behold a letter has arrived today requesting a stay. The court representative stated that they have recieved hundreds of these letters and the Judge has been granting the stay pending Judicial review on the Test case. :-( .

We should get official clarification by close of play today.

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Lula. I appretiate that, but will it cost me £35? The Court said that they have recieved hundreds of letters from the banks requesting Stays. Has anyone been successful recently arguing the case?

Stef

Claiming £590 in unauthorized OD fees, and £100 in interest from Barclays.

 

Remember "He who pays the piper calls the tune" well I've paid Barclays far too much so bloody well dance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...