Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old HSBC Credit Card Debt

      By dx100uk · Posted

      read and use the online sites in UPLOAD dx  
    • hugo1963
      Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old HSBC Credit Card Debt

      By hugo1963 · Posted

      Hi  Any free apps to download to pdf from android  H
    • hugo1963
      Lowell/Overdales Claimform - old HSBC Credit Card Debt

      By hugo1963 · Posted

      Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Littleted88
      Parking Charge Notice Received - Private land - Do I need to pay?

      By Littleted88 · Posted

      Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
    • BankFodder
      Evri has probably lost a Parcel again.

      By BankFodder · Posted

      Probably about 7 days or so. Do you have her email address?  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Barclaycard Credit card

marksteps

By marksteps
in Barclaycard

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

marksteps

marksteps

Posted
Posted

Can i claim on this?And how far back? Im interested in going for it, reading otherposts, it looks as if i could be successful.Would the initial letter be like the one i used for the bank etc?

I have changed cards over the years, either by losing them or having them stolen. Would that affect anything ie will they have records of me going OD on old cards.

 

:) x

Link to post
Share on other sites
alanfromderby

alanfromderby

Posted
Posted
Im stalling from attacking Barclaycard because i want to see if there is a way round this! I need the years 2001 to 2004 which i wont get from my DPA what can we do??

 

:)

 

Am I missing something..why not?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bookworm

Bookworm

Posted
Posted

Because B/card won't send them, Alan. They hide behind the Microfiche argument. Have a browse at the B/card threads, you'll soon see what OP means.

 

Mark, they will send you the semi-useless printout though, and since they've said they only started charging from mid-01, you should be able to estimate an amount from there. If the amount is too high, or they have refunded, let them prove it, and then explain to a judge why this info wasn'tmnmade available to you.

 

Or you can hit them with a S 9 court claim to force compliance. Takes a bit longer, but you'll get the right data to claim.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites
breadline

breadline

Posted
Posted

They will do eventually, the site is growing and sometimes different procedures take time to get around. Now where i live it would only take an hour :D to be shared but here it can take awhile longer.

 

Now if you have or see some one in your position you can pass it on :)

 

BL

Link to post
Share on other sites
breadline

breadline

Posted
Posted

They will do eventually, the site is growing and sometimes different procedures take time to get around. Now where i live it would only take an hour :grin: to be shared but here it can take awhile longer.

 

Now if you have or see some one in your position you can pass it on :-)

 

BL

Link to post
Share on other sites
fergal71

fergal71

Posted
Posted

hi not sure if this is the right way to go but I requested 6 years from barclaycard and got 2 years, i worked out how much they had charged me in 2 years and multiplied by 3. here is the prelim letter i sent, i assumed if they where to argue and wanted to go to court then they would have to provide the six years information anyway as they had breached dpa, and I would be happy if it was less as long as it was what i had been charged. I highlighted that it was estimate due to lack of statements they were able to provide.... maybe moderator can see if this is a good way to go I will keep you up to date LBA due out on 7th june....then moneyclaim 14 days later.... DONT MIND TELLING JUDGE IT WAS ESTIMATE AS BARCLAYCARD DISREGARDED THE DPA 1998...

 

copied this from parkes v barclaycard this is what I am trying see what happens???

 

I always request email from them to say they have received letters so I have copy if it does go to court..

 

 

Customer complaints department

Barclaycard

1234 Pavilion Drive

Northampton

NN4 7SG

 

24/05/06

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

CARD/ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to late fees and over limit charges are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

*I estimate that you have taken £1680 plus £134.40 which you have charged me in interest for the sums which you have taken. Total £1814.40

Additionally you have entered a default notice against my credit record. This default occurred merely in respect of unlawful charges levied by you or was the result of impecuniosity caused directly by the taking by you of penalty charges which you had applied unlawfully to my account.

 

*The reason I am estimating these charges is that you say you can only provide 2years information (may 04 until may 06) under the data protection act. I find this to be untrue and unlawful and a separate letter will be sent to the information commissioner to report these actions. I am willing to be advised if this amount is incorrect of the true amount, once this information is received and then can be adjusted accordingly.

 

In addition to full payment of the sum mentioned above I require that you remove the default entry from the register. Please note that mere correction or amendment to the entry will not be acceptable.

 

I require repayment in full of this money and removal of the default notice. If you do not comply fully within 14 days, I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Janet-M

Janet-M

Posted
Posted
I am willing to be advised if this amount is incorrect of the true amount, once this information is received and then can be adjusted accordingly.

 

You require proof that your estimate is wrong as well or let them prove it in court , as we all know they won't

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites
fergal71

fergal71

Posted
Posted

so I take it this is okay to do then????? If this is the case why is this not done by everybody having difficulty getting 6 years or more statements...Is this the way to go

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Cmdenny

Cmdenny

Posted
Posted

I paid for the 3 additional Statements at £3 each and I hope to claim this back as well.

HSBC, FS £100

Hfax Credit Card Full Settlement £330

Lloyds FS £503 (had to do moneyclaim + allocation questionaires

Halifax Full Settlement £979

Lloyds Credit Card Moneyclaim raised.

 

03/05/06 Fraud case with Egg resolved after 2 1/2 months!, full refund of fraud amount+interest+charges (£1060). Apology and cheque for £300 - BBC Working Lunch helped scare them into action.

Link to post
Share on other sites
fergal71

fergal71

Posted
Posted

lets not become them, follow the rules or the judge will see the greed....

Only direct action by the masses will work....

 

Look at all successes they have never come from negotiation!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
vw203

vw203

Posted
Posted
They will do eventually, the site is growing and sometimes different procedures take time to get around. Now where i live it would only take an hour :D to be shared but here it can take awhile longer.

 

Now if you have or see some one in your position you can pass it on :)

 

BL

 

i have no idead what to do regarding bank charges, can you please help

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
marksteps

marksteps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The statements i received where for May 2004 onwards with only one £25 fee!

I have just printed my next letter ready for posting Monday morning 9 am sharp for non-compliance....

They say i have to pay £3 per statement prior to April 2004.

 

This is the correct next steps right??

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites
marksteps

marksteps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Barclays are right old buggers... im seriously thinking of giving up! I m getting all confused and they aint as easy as the rest have been.

 

All this for £££, true which is mine, but i am only aware of £25 owed, until i see my statements that are held on micro...thingy and i have sent a letter today saying they have 15 days left to comply in sending complete statements, not fobbing me off with paying £3 per statement as its on microthingy. The letter i sent was a non-compliance.....have i done the right one?

 

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites
vw203

vw203

Posted
Posted

hi

the maximum you should pay for your statements is £10.00, i telephoned the commisioners office and he told me the maximum you should pay is ONLY £10.00, barclays tried that one on me and i threatened them with the ombussman at the commisioners office, dont take any of their fob off, they are trying to worm there way out of it.

hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites
marksteps

marksteps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I rang up and said i need statements before May 2004 even tho they are on micro thingy. I said they are covered under a DPA where i was told they are not and if i want them i need to pay.

 

I called again some 20 minutes later and the lady i spoke to said she would order them. Now for clarification , are these statements on microfilm covered under the DPA?

 

Who do i contact re this query, i cannot see anything on the site about them. Im stressed as i only have £25 to claim in the statements i have but i know there is more, i was awful at getting charges in the start...I just dont wanna let them away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
give_me_it_back

give_me_it_back

Posted
Posted

The microfiche argument is a complex one...

 

have a look at these threads:

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=8318

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=10560

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=7236

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=8933

Abbey - 547.00 settled in full.

Second claim: £204 WON.

Barclaycard - 142.88 incl interest due WON BY DEFAULT as they didn't even bother entering a defence. Barclaycard paid up £184.88.

 

MBNA - Concluded £634.31

Capital One Concluded £148

Kinda disappointed I've no more banks to go after now...

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...