Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought the LibDems were going to table a motion of no confidence? I haven't heard anything about it for a couple of days.
    • Sorry for late reply dx been away and appreciate your replies. Yes he has paid the original borrowed amount off but obviously interest on top in which is owed and offer to write off. I know it is only a small amount owing but I didn't know whether to attempt to pursue with reclaim of previous paid amount plus interest. Or just to accept their offer and have removed from Credit File.
    • breaking news More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ 'bl**dy hell, if they'll have her I should be a shoe in. I dont stand a chance as a Tory, but I might if I'm the labour candidate' .. is rumored to be heard again and again at the Torys favorite  subsidised bars of Westminster.   More Tory MPs ‘pondering defecting’ as Natalie Elphicke ‘sorry’ - live WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Labour frontbencher says other Conservatives wrestling with their futures and calls grow for Diane Abbott to be let back into party "Wes Streeting insisted his party would not take just any Tory MP" .. as he looked nervously looked over his shoulder   We may be looking forward to a vote of no confidence in the Guv by the newly majority labour party as early as next week has allegedly been overheard
    • You were given this PCN because you overstayed not because you went to Starbucks or MaccyDs from the other car park. I assume therefore that the parking time is only 30 minutes as you were recorded as being there for 38 minutes. Given that there is a Consideration time and a Grace period  as well as the time between their photographs of your car arriving and leaving one wonders why they gave you a ticket. Force of habit I suppose. Because they are on airport land which is governed by Bye Laws that supercede PoFA we do not usually look at their PCNs there because in none of them can the charge be transferred from the driver to the keeper  as would normally happen after 28 days if the charge is unpaid and the land is not subject to Byelaws. In your case as they have failed to specify the Parking period  which is the time car is spent actually parked in a parking space not the bit that they include which is driving from the entrance to the parking space and the other bit from the parking space to the exit. As that reduces the lawful time you were actually parked I would suggest that they have breached your GDPR.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Dazzel Vs Lloyds **WON IN BRUM!**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6158 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Pondy

 

Once again, thanks for the information.

 

The paragraph you are worried about is an attempt to get Lloyds to produce the documentation on time, or risk getting their defence struck out. This cuts down the delay tactics used. but, it also requires you to get your info in on time.

They are very naughty

As long as you do that you have nothing to worry about
.

Thank goodness for that

 

I copied the section G wording on a separate piece of paper which i attached to the form. Then i just put a note in section G :-

 

"Please refer to the attached Note & attached proposed "draft order for directions" for consideration".

 

Make sure your claim number is on the attached sheet if you do this.

I have followed your advice, and done as you have suggested.

 

I have copies of the section G wording and also the Draft order i sent with my AQ. if you want i can post them up for you to copy.

I think I should be Ok, if I have done as you suggested.

 

Again Pondy, I cannot thankyou enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Pondy

 

 

I was thinking, as this is now at the court process, my claim is for £265:00 plus court costs = £295:00, I have not charged the bank any interest, although I was thinking may be I should now as they have stalled for so long, any idea how and if I'm allowed to do this?

 

 

Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only by amending your claim for £35 fee (unreclaimable) + inevitable delay to your claim. On £265 I wouldn't have thought it was worth the hassle. Up to you, though.

Michael, thank you, I'll take your advice, and stick with my original claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

 

I have now received my court date: Friday 29th June 2007, (Next Friday)

 

 

I am slightly nervous to say the least.

 

 

Oh, btw, I have had difficulty trying to post over the last few day's, I can access the site, and the forums, but when I click on to add a comment within my thread, the thread does not open, I get a message about internet explorer has to close, is it a common problem on the site?

 

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need details please -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/100350-birmingham-hearings-29th-june.html#post940240

 

PM me again with details as per that post.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 days prior to attending court, Lloyds agreed to transfer the full amount of my claim into my account.

 

For those that may have reservations about proceeding, go for it.

 

May I just say a personal thank you to those who volunteered their time to assist me, your support, guidance, and assist has been very much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!!!!!:-D

 

It seems lloyds didn't fancy it then, even in Brum with judge Cooke. Says something, I reckon.;)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dazzle,

Congratulations! :D

Well done! Really pleased for you!

Make sure the money is in your account before you inform the courts the claim is settled, although i guess you only have 3 days before your due in court anyway.

Then a little donation to CAG?

Pondy :)

LloydsTSB - Current Account claim £5,554 settled unconditionally 25.4.2007 :D

If the Pondfish has helped click his scales! ;-)

 

Please donate to this site if you can! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then a little donation to CAG?

 

Pondy :)

 

 

Of course Pondy, my claim is only for £293.00, and with limited funds that I have, I'm sure every penny will help.

 

 

Without the members and this site, I would have never have achieved my goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...