Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - Default Notice - HP Agreement


DNA
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I need some advice from someone in the know because I've not got a clue!

 

I am party to an HP agreement in joint names with Welcome Finance secured on a car we purchased in 2002. We had financial difficulties in the past and Welcome served us with a Default Notice on 5 April 2006 basically saying pay the arrears or come to an arrangement within 10 days or the agreement will be terminated and they would chase us for the full outstanding amount.

 

I contacted Welcome and agreed a repayment plan at a reduced rate and nothing else was mentioned about the Default Notice.

 

I now want to voluntarily terminate the agreement to hand the car back to them. Welcome now tell me that because they served a Default Notice:

 

a) I can no longer voluntarily terminate, I can only voluntarily surrender

b) If I do, they will take the car and sell it at auction

c) The proceeds of sale will be deducted from the outstanding amount

d) I will still have to pay the balance although they would consider a staggered shortening of the outstanding amount (they have already agreed on a loan agreement I have with them to write off the balance if I pay a set sum for a set period of time)

 

As far as I am aware, I made contact with them and agreed a repayment plan which I am sticking to. Does that mean the Default Notice no longer has any effect and are Welcome playing by the book in saying that I have no entitlement to voluntarily terminate?

 

The upside to terminating rather than surrendering means that I would pay less to Welcome at the end of the day - is this just a ploy by Welcome to squeeze more money out of me?

 

Thanks,

Aleks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the default notice was remedied and you have kept to the original agreement then you could still VT under s99 of the CCA. If your repayment proposal is for payments which are different to the original payments required it could mean that you have not stuck to the agreement and there has been a lawful default, this would mean that your right under s99 would have been lost. have you checked your credit file?

 

if you have defaulted and wish to change the amount you pay you could consider applying for a time order.

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 06 Time Orders

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You can terminate the agreement at any time, provided they haven't terminated already. The fact you made an arrangement does not invalidate, cancel, or otherwise negate the effect of the Default Notice. However, you have to check the wording of the Notice to see if termination happens automatically when you fail to remedy the default, or whether it requires some other act (like Welcome notifying you in writing of termination). You should also check the termination clause of the terms and conditions of the HP agreement to see whether they have to terminate in writing. If either the Default Notice or general terms and conditions require them to terminate in writing, and they haven't, then you still have the right to VT - Welcome of course do not want you to VT because they will lose money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted another lengthy message about Welcome in the hope that someone can help - I've asked time and again for the copy of the agreement I signed in 2003 but they've not sent one to me. I also have some doubt as to whether I should be paying for payment protection insurance I took out originally, etc - see my other post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've defaulted under the original agreement then that agreement is no longer in force. The new agreement, currently in force, is the one in which you agreed to pay the balance under a reduced payment scheme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The situation is that I signed an agreement in July 2002 which was superceded by the April 2003 agreement. It is the April 2003 agreement that I defaulted on; however, by contacting Welcome and agreeing a reduced payment scheme and continuing to get statements of account and them referring to the agreement, does not that suggest that the agreement is still in force. I have only been told once over the telephone that "the agreement is terminated" and I have never received a copy of the signed April 2003 agreement despite asking several times in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a request under section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and don't forget to pay the statutory fee of £1. They will be obliged to give you a copy of the executed agreement and a statement of payments made. If they do not comply within 12 working days, they will be in breach of the Act and will be unable to enforce the agreement (until they do comply). If after a month they are still in breach, they commit a criminal offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I need some advice from someone in the know because I've not got a clue!

 

I am party to an HP agreement in joint names with Welcome Finance secured on a car we purchased in 2002. We had financial difficulties in the past and Welcome served us with a Default Notice on 5 April 2006 basically saying pay the arrears or come to an arrangement within 10 days or the agreement will be terminated and they would chase us for the full outstanding amount.

 

I contacted Welcome and agreed a repayment plan at a reduced rate and nothing else was mentioned about the Default Notice.

 

I now want to voluntarily terminate the agreement to hand the car back to them. Welcome now tell me that because they served a Default Notice:

 

a) I can no longer voluntarily terminate, I can only voluntarily surrender

b) If I do, they will take the car and sell it at auction

c) The proceeds of sale will be deducted from the outstanding amount

d) I will still have to pay the balance although they would consider a staggered shortening of the outstanding amount (they have already agreed on a loan agreement I have with them to write off the balance if I pay a set sum for a set period of time)

 

As far as I am aware, I made contact with them and agreed a repayment plan which I am sticking to. Does that mean the Default Notice no longer has any effect and are Welcome playing by the book in saying that I have no entitlement to voluntarily terminate?

 

The upside to terminating rather than surrendering means that I would pay less to Welcome at the end of the day - is this just a ploy by Welcome to squeeze more money out of me?

 

Thanks,

Aleks

 

 

Hi there..

i may be able to help with this.

although you did not say whether more than 1/2 the loan amount was paid or not,but remember if more than half is paid you can give the car back and voluntarily.But they like making a fuss ;so tell them this; "i am voluntarily giving this car back,or stop paying now and i shall see you in court!,unless you allow me to voluntarily terminate .i also want you to clear the default , as i never received the default letter anyway as it should have been sent

registered post,clearly you did not and i never received the notice therefore i was not even aware that you sent me a default note.so it is up to you take it or leave it..

believe me it works!you dictate the terms ,not them .!!

good luck.

r.d

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted another lengthy message about Welcome in the hope that someone can help - I've asked time and again for the copy of the agreement I signed in 2003 but they've not sent one to me. I also have some doubt as to whether I should be paying for payment protection insurance I took out originally, etc - see my other post.

 

 

hi there..

you can cancel your PPI immediately..and do it now as it`s absolutely useless anyway .just another way for the WF to rob you blind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

I am in exactly the same boat as yourself. Except that my account was passed over to their Collections Department who agreed a new repayment plan. But, they haven’t drawn up a new contract yet, and this was agreed back in February. Not sure where I stand, I could ask them for a copy of the signed agreement, which they will by law have to supply. But I know that will be impossible because I haven’t signed one. So I should be able to get them on some kind of technicality.

 

Anyway, back to your question. The default will still stand as you haven’t paid off the balance.To voluntarily terminate you have had to have paid off the amount stated on your contract, under the termination section, have you done so? Your best bet would be to contact Consumer Direct or your local Trading standards office, they will be able to help you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick note relating to Welcome - Many of their agreements have actually been found to be unenforceable due to the way that the charge for credit is stated on the agreement. It all hinges on whether the PPI was optional at point of sale or whether you were told you HAD TO have it & wouldn't get the HP otherwise.

 

If the PPI shows as optional on the agreement but you were told that it wasn't then the charge for credit will probably be stated incorrectly meaning that the agreement is totally unenforceable.

 

If this may be the case you really need proper advice via Trading Standards or CAB...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

the default notice gives you 10 days to clear your arrears if you didn't do this then no you cannot legally terminate the agreement, this should have been made clear when accepting your p'ment proposal really

Link to post
Share on other sites

the default notice gives you 10 days to clear your arrears if you didn't do this then no you cannot legally terminate the agreement, this should have been made clear when accepting your p'ment proposal really

 

Hi there,

 

This thread is 3 years old, I'm not sure why you've bumped it

A default notice, by law, needs to give you at least 14 days to clear the arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...