Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

corsicanpine v ltsb - incomplete SAR/DPA


corsicanpine
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6260 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have recived just 5 and a half years of the 6 years requested. Should I, and how, request the further 6 months. Or should I just claim the £1500 for the 5 and a half years?

 

I feel I should go all the way and claim the lot for 6 years!!

 

I have drafted a response,

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

ACCOUNT NUMBER: *********

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated 31st January 2007. The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges.

 

You have provided statements for the following period:

 

September 18th 2001 – February 20th 2007 inclusive

 

You have not provided statements for the following period:

 

February 2001 – September 17th 2001 inclusive.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation for this period. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

As I have already paid my £10 DPA fee with my initial request I shall expect you to provide this information as part of that request.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Would this be OK to send and should I put a timescale on it?

 

Anyone advise.

 

Thanks

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good to me...they haven't complied fully with the SAR so give them what's left of the 40 days since you sent the letter. If 40 days are already up, give them 7 days to comply, or you will commence county court action.

 

You can also give them a quick call...sometimes if they know they've made a boo-boo, they send out the remaining statements super-duper quick.

Crash

 

 

 

 

DAY 1: 12/09 - S A R to British Gas

DAY 45: 27/10 - Data Non-Compliance sent off

DAY 67: 18/11 - N1 Deemed served

DAY 114: 03/01 - Judgment served £60 cheque rec'd; Prelim sent for overpayment refund of £393.06

24 Days: E2Save Settled in full £70

59 Days: Barclaycard claim Settled in full £134.39

162 Days: Halifax Settled in full £1543.80

179 Days: Barclays1 Settled in full £2450.45 + £447.02 in costs

254 Days: Barclays 2 Settled in full £1450.91

 

Advice & opinions offered are personal, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Corsicanpine,

 

It would be better if you stick to posting on one thread. This keeps a complete history of your claim in one area, and makes it easier for people to help and advise.

 

regards,

 

Pondfish :)

LloydsTSB - Current Account claim £5,554 settled unconditionally 25.4.2007 :D

If the Pondfish has helped click his scales! ;-)

 

Please donate to this site if you can! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Corsicanpine,

 

I too had not used a forum before i looked at this site, and was "a fish out of water too! :D ". No problem, it's quite easy really.

 

This is your thread! each time you type a message it is called a "Post". a thread is a series of posts linked together. When you replied to my message your reply was listed below my message. This post will then be added below that and so on..... The way this helps is people can look at the entire history of your claim in order to see the best way to help.

 

If you start a new thread for each question or update you have it is more difficult to discover what has gone on up to date.

 

So to stick with this thread, all you need to do is find it and type a message in the "Quick Reply box" after the the post in the thread.

 

Another useful thing to know is that you have a "Control Panel". If scroll up to the top of the page there is a small Grey-blue ish bar. It looks like this:-

 

User CP FAQ Calender New Posts Search Quick Links CAG Chat Room Classified Log out

 

Click on User CP, and you should see a list of "subcribed threads". All the threads you start, and anyone else's thread you have posted a message on should be listed here.

 

This is very useful as you dont have to go looking for your thread. Simply click on the thread you want to look at and it will take you directly there!

This will also alert you to any new posts on any of the threads you have subcribed to.

After i log on to CAG I always click on User CP first to see if anything has been added to my subcribed threads.

 

Hope this helps you get a little more help - and enjoyment - out of your time on CAG.

 

regards,

 

Ponfish

LloydsTSB - Current Account claim £5,554 settled unconditionally 25.4.2007 :D

If the Pondfish has helped click his scales! ;-)

 

Please donate to this site if you can! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I sent the letter requesting the remaining 6 months statements with no response as of yet. Should I take this up with the Data Commissioner or whoever?

 

I have decided to send in my claim for the 5 and a half years anyway, and reclaim the rest when I receive the statements.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

still no response to first 6 months of SAR. Although have gone ahead with prelim on what data I have at the moment, will follow up the rest!!

 

I have just recieved a letter stating that the charges are not charges for default on the account and that these charges are being looked at by some dept????????

 

MCOL, although the 14 days isn't up yet! Anyone advise??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Have you sent the LBA yet? You need to send that before you start the Court claim.

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html I WON!!!!:D :D

If I have helped, please click my scales:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...