Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Has anyone been "sold" a loan by the Coop to cover unlawful charges (overdraft) and then been successful in getting their money back?


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Phatram,

 

As the account is in dispute, and the Co-Op are aware of such, then they should not have even involved Fredrickson, nor shared any of your personal data with them.

 

You should perhaps seek some guidance from your solicitor, and ask them about your rights in such circumstances.

 

I had a similar situation myself recently with regards a dispute with a utility company.

I sent their debt collectors the following letter, and haven't heard anything more from them since (mind you it has only been 2 weeks, so we'll se just how effective it has actually been soon).

 

Perhaps firstly just check with your solicitor if such a letter would be appropriate to send in your case ?

 

(PS: With thanks to Martin3030 who helped me compose this):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

 

With regards the above accounts/reference numbers; 
Your client (COMPANY NAME) have been aware since early (DATE) that these accounts were in dispute.

Despite clear written notification of such, your clients have shown a total disregard to both Consumer legislation and also matters under the Data Protection Act 1980 by its instructions to yourselves to further pursue collection whilst a dispute remains. 



 

I now put you on written notice to the fact that this matter has now been handed over to my solicitors to deal with.

 

Therefore, you must now immediately cease sending any further collection correspondence to myself, refrain from any further attempts at collecting any payment with regards these accounts, and also immediately cease processing my personal data in respect of any alleged arrears or debt.

 

Should your collection activity continue following being made aware of this:

 

1/ I shall immediately seek directions from the Court with a view to obtaining an injunction against your company, preventing your continued harassment.

 

2/ I shall also file formal complaints with the FSA, the OFT and also my local Trading Standards office, with a view to urging a review of your suitability to retain your CCA74 & other regulatory licenses.

 

3/ All correspondence from yourselves will continue to be retained by myself, and may later be used as evidence in a future claim for damages.

 

The FSA has recently issued stern warnings to those individuals and organisations who have initiated hostile actions (threats and secondary actions, addition of collection charges, and the sharing, passing or processing of personal data with third parties) whilst customers are seeking to enforce their Statutory and legal rights, and I strongly suggest you familiarise yourselves to these warnings.

 

Since this is a formal complaint you are also required to send me a copy of your complaints procedure, as per guidance from the Financial Services Association, and also the Financial Ombudsman, who act on their behalf.

 

I look forward to receiving a copy of these, together with your written undertaking that your own attempts at further recoveries will now be suspended.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

YOUR NAME

 

 

(always best to avoid actually signing such documents, in order to avoid any possibility that they may "lift" your signature).

  • Haha 1

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any update Phatram ?

 

Did you seek guidance from your solicitor and/or send the letter ?

 

Do the trick ?

 

What's current status of your issues ?

 

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still getting hassle ?

 

Did you post a letter to them regards ceasing doing so ?

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was getting hassled from a DCA regards a disputed account when I sent my above letter.

 

They not only immediately stopped... but they actually DID send me a copy of their dispute procedures !!

 

Obviously a bit panicked about any threat at all to their CCA licence that may arise by their not complying with procedures properly.

 

PM

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

With regards the above accounts/reference numbers; Your client THE COOPERATIVE BANK have been aware since early 2009 that this account was in dispute, and being investigated by FOS.

 

 

 

In your letter of the 23 November 2009, you enclosed copies of 6 statements of our current account with The Co-Operative bank. This data has been illegally processed by yourselves and the Bank as the account was closed on 16 June 2009 with a nil balance. We are in the process of taking action against yourselves and the Co-Operative bank concerning this matter.

Despite clear written notification of such, your clients have shown a total disregard to both Consumer legislation and also matters under the Data Protection Act 1980 by its instructions to yourselves to further pursue collection whilst a dispute remains. I now put you on written notice to the fact that this matter has now been handed over to my solicitors to deal with.

Therefore, you must now immediately cease sending any further collection correspondence to myself, refrain from any further attempts at collecting any payment with regards these accounts, and also immediately cease processing my personal data in respect of any alleged arrears or debt.

Should your collection activity continue following being made aware of this:

1/ I shall immediately seek directions from the Court with a view to obtaining an injunction against your company, preventing your continued harassment.

2/ I shall also file formal complaints with the FSA, the OFT and also my local Trading Standards office, with a view to urging a review of your suitability to retain your CCA74 & other regulatory licenses.

3/ All correspondence from yourselves will continue to be retained by myself, and may later be used as evidence in a future claim for damages.

The FSA has recently issued stern warnings to those individuals and organisations who have initiated hostile actions (threats and secondary actions, addition of collection charges, and the sharing, passing or processing of personal data with third parties) whilst customers are seeking to enforce their Statutory and legal rights, and I strongly suggest you familiarise yourselves to these warnings.

Since this is a formal complaint you are also required to send me a copy of your complaints procedure, as per guidance from the Financial Services Association, and also the Financial Ombudsman, who act on their behalf.

I look forward to receiving a copy of these, together with your written undertaking that your own attempts at further recoveries will now be suspended.

Yours Faithfully

Edited by phatram
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Fredricson International calling 4 times a day now. I've handed this over to a solicitor. Should I let them know when they write to me?

 

This calling is excessive. Tell them you don't have to accept phone calls or visits and that you will do everything in writing or in your case then pass them to your solicitor. But do threaten them that if they do persist in this tactic that you will report them to the proper Authority under the "Harrassment Act 1997" which says excessive phone calls leading to distress is a criminal offence and can carry a fine of £5000 and/or imprisonment. In the Act they are not to ring up more than the prescribed amount of times under law (twice).

 

This does have an effect if you be forceful in your tone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 month later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Has anyone been "sold" a loan by the Coop to cover unlawful charges (overdraft) and then been successful in getting their money back?
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...