Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asbo v Abbey


Asbo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6287 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I sent my SAR on 20 Feb using the template on this forum and received a letter from Pam Speed (Business Manager) this morning (03.03). I've not done this sort of thing before and it's all a bit daunting to me, so advice would be most welcome!!!

 

I *think* I've got the letter (delaying tactic?) telling me they can't supply all of the data but at the bottom of the letter it states:

 

Any previous transactions have been archived onto microfiche and its not possible to provide you with a computer print out of this information. However, we have made arrangements to send you a list of archived transactions between 2001 and 2005, under separate cover.

 

Does this mean they are complying with my request or should I send another letter stating that they have 40 days to comply from date of my first letter? (as I've read on here).

 

Many thanks

Asbo

 

p.s They are saying that not all manual interventions are recorded and cannot help with that request??? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Niklowe

Hi Asbo,

 

This is just a standard letter from Abbey. The bit at the bottom of the letter has been added on, as their bluff was called by the OIC last year about their microfiche arguement. The're slow in sending the data, but you should receive it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, their arranging for archived records to be sent on, so should be a OK.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flippin eck , just recieved 12 separate envelopes all containing a monthly statement. Bet my postman loves me.(thats what our bank charges pay for) just waiting for the microfiche printout now then I'll unleash hell:) :) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My friend is claiming from a LloydsTSB business account and received 65 A4 envelopes (count them, 65) each containing a months worth of statements.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right , I've got my approach for repayment letter and a schedule of charges all ready to send off. Should i have included the interest charged while overdrawn in the schedule or attatch it on a separate schedule or leave it off altogether

All help appreciated, thanks Asbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

The interest charged whilst o/d is tricky.

 

They can charge you o/d interst, the trick is deducting the charges accrued from your o/d and seeing what the difference is. If the difference puts you in a positive balance, then claim the full interest charge for that month.

 

If you are still o/d after deducting you charges, then I tried to work it out as a percentage and then slightly undervalue it (not by much though) and deduct that from the actual interst charge. There is a spreadsheet in the templates section, but I found it too confusing.

 

Havn't explained it too well but I hope you get the gist of it. I am sure you will get more acurate ways of doing it, but it worked for me.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Louis

 

It is way too confusing, I think I'll not be greedy and leave it off. Charges alone come to over 3k so that will do for me

Asbo

 

P.S. scales clicked, Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Thanks mate,

 

I think in a way, not being greedy and getting the 3 grand back will still be a great result, and don't forget the satisfaction of knowing you got one over the Shabby, priceless in my book,

 

Best of luck mate

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Karnevil

But "advanced, Exel and spreadsheet " in the same sentance doesnt do it for me, I'm having trouble with the basics:confused: :)

Asbo

 

Oh, just remembered, should i send my shedule to the address i first used or to the address i got in my reply from Pam Speed in Bradford?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...