Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Swift Couriers / Ruthbridge - Warning & advice needed!


DanP1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Around 3 weeks ago I got a letter from Swift Couriers stating they had tried to deliver a parcel but no one had been home so could I call to arrange a more convenient time. As I was waiting for a couple of things from Ebay it didn’t seem too strange so I did so. Arranged a time and also left them my mobile number just in case they had any further problems.

 

When the guys didn't turn up I got a bit suspicious and didn't call back. Then, a few days ago, I get a call from a very serious sound woman Marie / Mary Peters from Ruthbridge re a 10 yr old debt from an old MBNA card I haven't even used for at least 6 yrs, stating they had sent me 5 letters and that they hadn't had any contact. I requested that all communication be done in writing and that they should actually try to send me a letter outlining the alleged debt and I would get back to them.

 

Anyway letter arrives on Sat and guess what? Ruthbridge and Swift Couriers are both based out of 43-45 Broad St. TW11 8QZ.

 

I’m not all that worried about this as its statue barred, so I’m just gonna go ahead and CCA they them.

 

However should I report either Swift / Ruthbridge cos Swift has obviously passed on my details to them?

 

When I write to them with a CCA should I remind them that the alleged debt would be statute barred by now anyway?

 

Any advice on the content of the letter and whether I should report these guys to the ICO, OFT, TS etc would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't received a parcel from Swift since then, write to them saying

that you are expecting a valuable package and you are getting concerned

that they have made no further attempt to deliver it. Ask when you can

expect delivery.

 

Next, get copies of your credit files from the three credit agencies to confirm

there has been no action on that account. There is a letter to send

Ruthbridge that the debt is out of date, but if there is nothing on your

credit files, they can't do much as the debt will be statute barred.

 

Wait till Swift come back to you about the parcel they have lost before

starting with Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice as usual! LOL! Will love to see what Swift come back with.....

 

I got my credit reports last week and nothing was showing for these guys. Should I then tell them it SB (via letter) or just send them the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it appears to be out of date so they cannot take you to Court-or even

pursue you at all, I would be inclined to let them write to you again if they

want. It's all ammo to hand over to TS when Swift reply.

 

Wouldn't waste time with the CCA-send them the out of date one-but not till

Swift can be seen to be involved.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

Just did a Data Processing Search on both Ruthbridge and Swift and turns out that Swift dont have a licence at all. Ruthbridge do but for an address in Putney not Twickenham.

 

Should I also report Swift to the ICO? And do Ruthbridge need to have the licence from their 43-45 Broad Street address rather than the Putney one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at that too.

The position is that a company should register using their registered address,

which is not necessarily the address they work out of. But even if they

have not used the correct address, the ICO takes the view that at least they have notified them which is what the Act requires. [it isn't, the Act requires

them to notify the ICO using their registered address ].

 

As far as Swift is concerned, they may not need to register with the ICO

normally. Perhaps how [if] they reply to your query, will help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr XXXXXX

XXXX Road.

Etc

Swift Deliveries

43-45 Broad Street

TW11 8QZ

0870 1611118

Your Ref: XXXXXXX

19th February 2007

Dear Carol Adams,

As you will see from the enclosed letter I was contacted by you on the 2nd of Feb 2007 to inform me that you had a “2 kg package” that you had attempted to deliver on the previous Tuesday.

I am urgently expecting a valuable delivery and so I called and left my number to call back. Steve then returned my call and informed me it would be delivered the following Monday (5th of Feb) between 6pm and 7pm.

This delivery was never made and I’m concerned that no further attempts have been made to deliver it and that the parcel may now have been lost.

Please inform me of your misplaced parcel procedures and customer guarantees on this matter.

Yours sincerely

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the below piece, Swift is the tracing 'brand' for Ruthbridge - can't see how the letters have been OK'd by OFT as surely posing as a delivery company to solicit information is covered by the OFT section regarding communicating with debtors in a misleading fashion?

 

 

 

 

 

Not A [problem] - Review of Ruthbridge Ltd, Broad Street, London

 

Swift is in deed the trace side of Ruthbridge Ltd and express delivery letters to the Occupier are from the debt collection side, but these are only sent if the company is unaware of the current occupiers details, this is not a [problem] as there will always be a delivery of some form of correspondence for somebody who probably lived at the address some time before.

The reason you may get these types of letters is because the company deals in very old debt and therefore their clients will prob have supplied old information.

The tel number quoted for Express Delivery is not a premium line number.

Both types of letter have been ok'd by the office of fair trading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note this was posted by "an ex employee"...... Sounds like a current one to me.

 

Ive also found a Swift Deliveries based in Doncaster. Odds on they have no connection. I will be giving them a call and making sure they understand that a disreputable DCA is using their name as a front for such activities.

 

Keep you posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

We received the same letter only the other day. My husband phoned them questioning the delivery, as we too were expecting a delivery, the bloke he spoke said that he was unable to access the information but if we give him our phone number he would get back to us. My husband told them that he would get back to them (our number is ex directory and we only give it out to people we know). My husband rang them back only to be told expect delivery the following day

 

I took no notice of the letter but when our 2kg package failed to arrive I looked at the letter and noted that no name was on the letter just the address then alarm bells started to ring. Reading on here I was right.

 

Is this normal practice to send out only to the address as this has alarmed me as I have no reason for these sort of people (if you can call them that) should be chasing me.

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got another one through this time from "Express Deliveries" (how stupid are these people?) so called them (withheld my number) and refused to give him the ref number until he gave me some more info.

 

I said "Why would I want to give you any information. You could be anyone? And having looked up your address you’re on the same site as Ruthbridge, a DCA. How does that work?"

 

"They’re our parent company"

 

"So your warehouse is shared with a DCA's offices?"

 

"Yes"

 

(In the background I then hear a bloke going through his Ruthbridge intimidation spiel)

 

"And from the sounds of it you share the same call centre as well.

 

Is it Express Deliveries, as you answered the phone, Express Delivery, as on this letter, or Swift Deliveries, who also share your address? And are you registered at companies house"

 

"Look mate. If you give me the reference then I'll give you some more information."

 

"Why should I do that? I don’t know who you are! And why is this letter addressed to The Occupier?"

 

"Cos we don’t know your name"

 

"But you’ve got a parcel for me haven’t you?"

 

"Yes"

 

"Well how many times to you get parcels sent to you with no name on them? Does anyone send you parcels, not letters, but parcels without knowing your name"

 

"I don’t know I’m eeerrr…..just a driver"

 

"The drivers answer the phones in the call centre"

"Sir. I'll see if a manager is available"

 

Waits for 5 mins. I think they thought I'd go away. Then another bloke comes on.

 

"Sir can I have your reference?"

"No. Can you tell me why you’re pretending to be 2 different deliver companies, when you are in fact a DCA? And if you are a delivery company why are you passing on private information without a Data Processing Licence"

 

"We'll still find out you know"

 

"What?"

 

"We're still gonna find out who you are and take you to court"

 

"So you’re not a Deliver Company then?"

 

Phone put down. Waited 5 mins. Called them back, the "Driver" answers, reminded him of our conversation and told him that I was in fact an Investigative Journalist for the BBC Watchdog show and would he or his seniors like to comment on the conversation we'd just had?"

 

Said "s**t" put me on hold.... I gave up after 5mins cos there was no way he was going to pick me up again.

 

Hope I’ve really f**ked up his weekend!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...