Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Broadband misery :o(


wemfish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6311 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Just moved house last month (20th) and have not had broadband since. . .

 

I was with Supanet, but they made such a mess of moving over to the new line that I told them to get lost. .

 

I asked Supanet for a MAC code but they refused and only finally agreed that they would provide one for £50, this was before the new rules came in on the 14th of February, I of course refused to pay.

 

I phoned BT and asked if I could have broadband from them, they agreed, but as Supanet had an account they had to wait for Supanet’s order to disconnect their BB in preparation for a new order to be made.

 

On the 12th of Feb. the Supanet’s order to disconnect went through and BT accepted the order for BB from me.

 

Yesterday the line was supposed to go live, the equipment arrived and I plugged it in, eagerly awaiting a decent connection for the first time in a month. . . but no, nothing. . The letter from BT said if nothing, wait till 8pm and plug in the equipment and wait an hour for the connection to stabilise. This I did, but still nothing, I messed about for another hour trying different cables and filters to try and get it working, but still nothing. I called the phone number on the paperwork only to be told that the office was closed! Do they do this on purpose? Get you to wait until it’s too late to do anything about it until Monday morning if it does not work?

 

The only info I got first of all was that the BB had not been switched on because the order had been cancelled! Well it was not me that cancelled it and further investigation revealed that it was something to do with another company’s marker on the line.

 

So after all this, I am stuck all weekend with no BB and the prospect of having to place yet another order for BB and wait yet another week or more before I can get sorted!

 

I said to the manager at the BT Broadband centre that if I was a big company like ICI etc they would sort it out immediately, but he still insisted that nothing could be done. I said that there are BT vans running about all the time, surly they could get on to pop in to the exchange and sort it out manually but they refused, even under the threat that I would cancel all my services with BT and go with another provider if nothing was done.

 

I will have to accept that for the moment, even if I give BT the push and go with another provider.

 

But I do have one question;

 

Does anyone have a phone number for someone high up in BT that has the power to over rule all their petty rules and sort something out immediately?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, you are pretty much stuck. I learned a long time ago that BT basically have no complaints department, and will not entertain complaints, regarding the time taken to activate broadband. This is because it is dependant on a "business to business" subsidiary of BT, BT Wholesale, who will not speak to you directly. And the ISP's themselves will not complain on your behalf, as they know BTW will not do anything.

 

That said, I am PMing you a name... :)

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

BT's hands are tied. If there's a marker left on the line, BT's system cannot do a thing until it is clear - one of the problems of having all this 'competition'. You need to expedite the removal of the flag by SupaNet, or appeal to the regulator for an enforced removal if they're playing silly sods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not got the BB sorted yet but it should be in a few days. . . .

 

I have got a couple of phone numbers here for anyone interested,

 

BT Wholesale, who can deal with tag removal etc (they are the real broadband provider) who were quite helpfull, and informed me that BT were messing me about and there was no marker on the line, just BT's incompetance here, and BT fobbing me off with excuses!!

0800 169 0934

 

And BT's head office, who have now helped speed things along for me, once I pointed out that the BB department had been messing me about;

0207 356 5000

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

WF, I am curious - did you actually manage to speak to someone at BT Wholesale, who would actually speak to you??? I tried that one for days!!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that BTW number is specifically for people with Marker issues on their line once you call it should be off the line within 10 days (sometimes sooner).

 

It's nothing to do with competition etc its just to do with the way that BT have set up ADSL systems in the UK if they wanted to they could sort it so the markers could be removed far quicker but why should they as BTW DONT have any competition so they dont need to worry about anything theyre in control.

 

Keep checking the BT wholesale line checker each day and as soon as it stops showing the ISDN/ADSL message at the bottom then your line should be clear and you can order however you're going to get saddled with the £50 activation fee well unless you sign up to a 12 month contract so the ISP pays it for you then recoups it but I would advise otherwise in case you have problems.

 

As for MACs well you cant use a MAC when you move house its for migrations on the same phone line only if you move house you get stuffed for activation fees even if the line already has been connected to a DSLAM which is ridiculous

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a phone call today from the manager of the complaints department at BT's head office, apologising for the problem's and promising to have me connected within 2 days . . . result!! :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and in less than 24 hours the broad band was on :)

 

so it goes to prove that they can turn on broadband as fast as they like, and the "it takes 5 days and cannot be done any faster, even if you talk to head office" is a load of b######'s"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...