Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide playing Hardball???


campino
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6284 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just a question regarding Nationwides policy at the moment

I am in the process of claiming back charges from banks and credit cards (managed to get back about £1250 so far J and still have more to claim!)

Anyhow, whilst I have been doing this, my current bank, Nationwide, who up until now I had no issues with, have hit me with 3 x £30 charges for refused Direct Debits & Standing Orders. I have had no previous charges with them as nowadays I am a lot more organised with my money. (The charges were the result of a cock-up – partly my fault, partly third-party company trying to take money out when they shouldn’t have.)

Obviously, as I am quite well versed regarding the whole claiming back charges issue, I firstly rang them up to try and persuade them politely to refund them.

Interestingly, polite as they were, they are saying now that Nationwide is point blank refusing to refund any charges (unless it is an error by Nationwide) they apparently have adopted this policy since Oct 05 (although I am sure they have paid out to people since that date) and they haven’t even altered their charges down to £12. I made several phonecalls at different times and spoke to both customer service bods and supervisors but they all seem to be singing from the same song sheet.

I imagine its all bulls**t and that Nationwide will pay out like the rest, but I thought I best check that nothing has changed that I don’t know about. They are my current bank and its only £90. As (apart from this) I like banking with them, I may let it go (charges are over 2 months span) as I have plenty of bigger fish to fry so to speak.

As a precaution though, I am also in process of opening parachute account.

What do you folks think?

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi campino

 

I noticed that you mentioned that it was partly third party (company). Are you aware of your direct debit guarantee. If the company takes money out of your account without your permission then YOUR BANK (not company are obliged to issue a full and IMMEDIATE refund hence you wouldn't have incurred charges. If a company changes a date they must give you at least 14 days notice.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont let them fob you off they know it is them not the company that have to refund you. Let me know how you get on. I wonder if anybody has ever used the Direct debit guaranee to get their money back I haven't but I saw a program about it a few months ago.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct Debit - Your rights

 

look at this just found it. Arm yourself before you dive in

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If any payment is made in error, you should contact your bank or building society who are responsible for giving you a full and immediate refund - even if the original error was made by the organisation collecting the payment.

 

Taken from link in #5.

 

Nationwide have let money go from your account without your permission. If as they were obliged to they gave you an IMMEDIATE refund you would not have gone overdrawn. I would go to your local branch and it is down to them.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q. Who actually controls Direct Debit payments?

 

A. The bank or building society that holds your account is responsible for all aspects of the running of that account. They are therefore answerable for all payments, including those made by Direct Debit.

 

I think we can safely conclude that the charge was incurred simply because of Nationwides error.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There argument seems to be that the actual amount taken would have been covered, but as the DD was refused, i never 'lost' this amount as i never paid it in first place (due to DD being refused)

 

The actual charge seems to lie outside of their responsibility - they claim that I can obviously claim the charge back from the third party company as its that companies fault that the DD charge was incurred.

 

Nationwide seem to be saying that they are only responsible for the actual money itself - so if they had paid that out in error, they would have to refund it etc. But the charge is not their (or mine) fault but the third-party company

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If any payment is made in error, you should contact your bank or building society who are responsible for giving you a full and immediate refund - even if the original error was made by the organisation collecting the payment.

 

Q. Who actually controls Direct Debit payments?

 

A. The bank or building society that holds your account is responsible for all aspects of the running of that account. They are therefore answerable for all payments, including those made by Direct Debit.

 

These quotes are from link in #5.

I knew they would say something like that. Under the D/D guarantee they should not have even paid the D/D.

 

So let me get this straight they are charging you for an unpaid D/D which they did not have your permission to pay in the first palce. I think you should remind them of the T's & C's. I think you will be better off going into branch.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going into the Branch might be better!

 

The crux of their argument seems to be that I only cancelled the DD with the Third Party company - because I didnt specifically ring them, they seem to be taking the view that 'how are they supposed to know'

 

The other issue is that their insurance means they can claim back monires wrognly claimed by DD's from the third party company, but I guess the actual charges are excluded from this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The crux of their argument seems to be that I only cancelled the DD with the Third Party company - because I didnt specifically ring them, they seem to be taking the view that 'how are they supposed to know'

Hate to be the bearer of bad news but I think If you have failed to inform bank to cancel D/D If the company attempted to collect a fixed amount on the same day then the direct debit guarantee MIGHT not cover. I might be wrong here but not too sure.

 

The other issue is that their insurance means they can claim back monires wrognly claimed by DD's from the third party company, but I guess the actual charges are excluded from this.

If it is their error then I would demand the charge back. Their error they sort it.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ignore that last post about bad news it is their problem

If any payment is made in error, you should contact your bank or building society who are responsible for giving you a full and immediate refund - even if the original error was made by the organisation collecting the payment.

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True

 

But the DD page says

 

"You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time and the process is very straightforward.

 

Simply contact your bank or building society, if this is by phone or internet, written confirmation may be required. We also recommend you notify the organisation concerned.

Your bank or building society can make the cancellation up to and including the due date, but try not to leave it until the last minute or you run the risk of a payment being made. Remember that cancelling the Direct Debit simply stops paying the organisation. If you carry on receiving the goods or service then you will have to organise an alternative payment method."

 

 

 

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask yourself a few questions

 

1) If they changed the date or amount without informing you then the bank must rectify it. So If they collected an amount different from what you agreed with them (£0.00 -cancelled) without informing you is that not the same in principal.

 

2) You do not have to inform the bank if the date or amount changes so why inform them if the amount changes to £0. Your argument to the bank(if you needed it) could be that you only cancelled it with the company and not the bank because it was only a temporary cancellation with a view to resetting it with the company the following month or so.

 

Remember

If any payment is made in error, you should contact your bank or building society who are responsible for giving you a full and immediate refund - even if the original error was made by the organisation collecting the payment.
  • Haha 1

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i genuinely was intending to restart DD at a later date with company! (although in the end it was easier to cancel and then start new policy at later date - although Bank dont need to know this!)

 

Cheers for advice - i will ring them again this evening and see if i get any joy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you

BTW thanks for reputation remark like a little birthday present to me:D hence don't be surprised if I am not on here tomorrow might have a bit of an headache from my birthday drink(turned into a long weekend):lol:

Knowledge is Power

Go get em!

Have I been of any help to you? if so please click my scales to the left to enhance my reputation. Thank you. If not PM me.

 

Nationwide - won claim 

Advice & opinions of mahharg are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello campino!

There are certain DD's that can only be cancelled by the recipient, not by yourself...am not quite sure which though?!

I've never had one of those type myself,

...I would imagine that it all depends on the Original Agreement that U signed with the recipient of the DD?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had similar problem with the Nationwide in the fact that I had a DD returned unpaid once before, but then paid the company (ie Sky) along with the next payment by card. Sky told me that they wouldn't take the next payment out but they did and I got charged for it by Nationwide because of no funds in the account at the time. Sky decided to claim both charges seperately and therefore I got charged twice by the Nationwide for this £30.00 x 2 plus en extra £20.00 for going overdrawn because of it. I told Sky that they were out of order but they couldn't give a brass monkey about it. I mentioned this to Nationwide who said that they would look into the matter. I got a letter from them, telling that "since I was a valued bank account holder" they sympathised, "you are not getting anything from us". Two faced liars they are (Nationwide).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...