Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

capquest cca CitiCard non compliance please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

i sent to capquest for my cca on 8/1/07 for a debt they purchased from citicard

 

 

i received a reply from them on 12/1/07 saying account would be placed on hold for 28 days whilst they obtain the required information,

 

 

i received a further letter today 10/2/07 stating they have requested this info directly from citicard and are awaiting a response,

and will contact me within 28days, as they have purchased the debt from citicard

(confimed by letter and s.a.r and the letter sent from them states DEBT PURCHASED FROM: CITICARD)

 

 

they are now the creditiors so should they not have bought the cca and rights of assignment from citicard

when the debt was sold to them and not need to contact citi as the debt is no longer citis problem?

 

please anybody help

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is pretty typical that these companies buy the debt without a copy of the

original agreement. However they will have a deed of assignment-it's just

that it is not part of a CCA requirement.

 

As it stands, Capquest are already in default as they should have sent the documents by the 26th January. They will have committed a criminal offence if they still haven't delivered by the 27th February.

 

So just keep quiet and let them commit the offence. Once that's done, they require a Court Order to reinstate the debt. they will be unlikely to do that

since they first face being charged with the offence and a large fine [probably more than your debt].

 

So just keep quiet, retain all correspondence and hope they do not produce

the required items by the end of this month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My Wife Has Received A Threatening Phone Call From Ruthbridge Over A Citicard Debt That Was Purchased First By Dlc And Now Ruthbridge, Sent Dlc Cca Request On 16th Jan No Reply So Obviously Didnt Have It And They Have Then Sold The Debt On To Ruthbridge What Can You Do About It? Do I Have To Resend Cca Request To These Arrogant Horrible People

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My Wife Has Received A Threatening Phone Call From Ruthbridge Over A Citicard Debt That Was Purchased First By Dlc And Now Ruthbridge, Sent Dlc Cca Request On 16th Jan No Reply So Obviously Didnt Have It And They Have Then Sold The Debt On To Ruthbridge What Can You Do About It? Do I Have To Resend Cca Request To These Arrogant Horrible People

 

Yes - are you caliming back charges on this?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we havent claimed back charges,

 

I would suggest that you send off an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to Citi and work out how much these are, and start the reclaiming process, but be aware that Citi make it a long old slog to reclaim from them - see here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/citicards/

 

but in the majority of the cases the charges have been approx 75% of the debt.

 

should i make ruth bridge aware of the fact dlc failed to supply cca request? and can DCAs not just keep passing these debts around once they receive a cca request to avoid complying

thanks

 

Up to you really - but they do keep on passing the info on to other DCA's. I would ask the creditor direct for the agreement - if they don't have it then no one can collect the debt!

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wrote to capquest informing them of their non compliance (12 + 30 days) got a letter this morning saying

 

CAPQUEST DEBT RECOVERY

ACCOUNT NO *****************

DEBT PURCHASED FROM CITICARD

 

WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CORRESPONDENCE.

 

PLEASE FIND RETURNED YOUR £1.00 FEE FOR A COPY OF AGREEMENT REQUEST WHICH WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN FROM CITICARD.

 

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ABOVE ACCOUNT IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING RETURNED TO CITICARD

 

as they have purchased the debt which this clearly states and also states the same on my citi statements when i got my SAR it surely no longer has anything to do with citi. Also my experian file states capquest issued a default on the account is this legal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm having the same problem with other DCAs.

 

it seems to be that when confronted they use this excuse of sending back to the creditor to get out of it.

 

i don't think banks sell the debts for pennies and then buy them back if the DCA wants it, that is a no-win situation for the DCA and risky for the bank.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

keep us updated!

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You must not stand for the default being registered with credit reference agencies.

 

Write Capquest a LBA demanding they remove the illegal default notice within 14 days. When they don't comply (and they won't ) you have a number of options 1) written complaint to Information Commisioner 2) Court Action- file an N1 stating default is unsubstantiated and claim compensation for distress. If they do not have CCA which they don't, they haven't a leg to stand on....You could also write to Experian but in my experience this is the least effective option.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...