Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • how did you pay them? dx  
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • An update - Still receiving emails and letters - but have been getting text messages too. nothing aggressive just asking me to get in touch.    the text makes it look like it from the bank on first glance - it reads -   'the banks name' would like to dicuss our recent communication...etc... then lists IDR phone number and email FYI - reporting them as spam
    • Hello, After seeing all of the posts about BMW on here I really wish I hadn't even considered them! I bought a used car from them over the weekend, one specifically which had a reversing camera and cruise control in the advert. I was foolish at the time of purchase and didn't check to see these functions work on the test drive (totally my fault). Now that the car is home I've checked and checked and neither of these functions are available. I even checked on Parkers and it seems that no Skoda Kamiq '21 models come with any parking cameras at all. When buying the car, I was told all that was needed was 'Four signatures and £500' to secure it. I was never shown any of the documents, and instead the sales rep opened a box on his iPad and asked me to sign. He had been complaining about the length of time some customers take these days all throughout my time with him. (Again) foolishly I signed. In my email inbox I now have four attachments from BMW, one of which is my signature under a letter which says that the cars don't need to match the advertisements online, or have any of the features that a sales rep talks about. I realise that I've made mistakes in not doing my due diligence here, but thought I might as well ask the experts here if I have any rights left to claim that the car was miss-advertised, or if I unknowingly signed them away? Thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rightfullymine v Nationwide


rightfullymine
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

h ok so i do the other one ok!!

 

but you know when you get the last sheet with your statements that lists unpaid cheqs & dds and unauth overdrafts ?? they list interest seperately do i list that too?? its only a matter of pence each time?? so is it worth doing the complex one or can i forget it ?? not sure whats best :? :? :?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i have done the simple spreadsheet but i am a bit unsure if i am doing the right thing !!!

my claim is for 1205.00 thats not including the 8% !! (thats for direct debits & cheques fees only)

my uncertainty is i also have been charged 101.03 for unauthorised overdraft fees. i looked at the spreadsheet and notes to cover the overdraft fees and it put me off a bit, i have also read on here that its easier to not claim for the overdraft and interest :confused: .

 

i think its not worth it but then why should they get away with my money??

does anyone have any words of wisdom that could help me decide once and for all.

i am no great mathmatician and all the working out of interest scares me :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

i have been reading a few other threads and they say they have added interest but no mention of unauth overdrafts?? very confused now!!!!!!!

please help me :oops:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

my uncertainty is i also have been charged 101.03 for unauthorised overdraft fees.

Is this figure for unauthorised overdraft fees or is it overdraft interest.

 

You can claim unauthorised overdraft fees, but these are normally round figures.

 

You can claim overdraft interest, but only that which relates to interest charged on your penalties, but it's tricky to separate out from the general overdraft interest figure.

 

Vampiress has a spreadsheet, (the advanced one), in the bank templates library, which attempts to calculate this

 

It's quite complex and unless your claim is large may not amount to that much, so for simplicity's sake, some people don't bother

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks michael,

i checked throught them again and found another one !

then overall total not including interest is 115.00.

not sure if this is substantial enough to persue if interest is difficult. shame i just cant claim for the amount they have taken from me!! or can i?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rightfullymine.

 

Participating as you requested. The interest (not the 8%) was the monthly overdraft interest Nationwide charged me over the years from 2001, as calculated by the 'complex' spreadsheet.

 

I work with figures all day so it's easy for me! Were you charged interest, i.e. were you ever overdrawn on the account you are claiming the return of charges from? It is important to get this bit right before you send your schedules. I am willing to help if you like :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly thank you pitters for answering me so promptly :)

 

i am this morning still having a major delemma... thank you for your offer of help, in figures i am only talking 115.00 that has been taken from me in unauth overd. fees (no interest).

 

i suppose i would be better to stick to the simple and claim back 1205.00 of which i can be more confident.. i could just mention in the letter (not including 115.00 of unauthorised overdraft charges) then maybe they will give that back to me out of the kindness of their heart !!

 

i will give it a thought for an hour.

 

thanks again pitters

:lol: have a good day

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi emmap21

when you first send off the SAR to request your information you must send a cheque for £10. the letter is in the templates thread so you can get the wording correct. the £10 is the one and only charge you need to pay to get all the relevant info you need for the past 6 years. if you ask for the information without a SAR letter the will try to charge £5 a statement!

check out the barclaycard thread and you will see how others are progressing.

remember to post useing recorded delivery, so then you can go onto royal mail website and see who and when took delivery of your letter.. then its 40 days waiting. i recieved mine in 3 weeks by recorded delivery.

good luck in getting back whats rightfully yours !!

 

if i have been of any help please add to my reputation by clicking the middle icon bottom left.. thank you

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive done my simple spreadsheet... and just about to print the 2nd letter.. can anyone confirm what address i send this letter too..

the SAR i sent to nationwide house pipers way swindon.. but the package i recieved was addressed kings park road, moulton park northampton... should i send it back to there to henry geidt, or pipers way again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi pitters

thanks for your help, ok i will send to pipers way again.. so i have decided to go the simple route as i dont think the figures are worth the worry!!

how do you think i should add the unauth over fees just an add on in the letter. or put at the bottom of the spreadsheet??

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...