Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council Tax


tiglet
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just been reading an article about a man who has claimed £2,600 back from the council because his house had been placed in the wrong tax band - apparently, very few houses were actually surveyed in 1991 and estate agents working for the ocuncil just guessed.

 

When I bought my house, it was fairly decrepit and needed lots of work doing to it, unlike most of the houses around here, and I was wondering whether anyone had looked into this previously, and if so, had any advice?

 

God this websites great - I'm try to get back money from everyone now!

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not every house is surveyed, only a representative number of house types but dilapidation means nothing in assessing the charge as it is based on a 'typical' house of similar size, bedrooms and garden. You can check online or view the valuation roll to see what Band similar houses in the same street are, and this will give you a good indication as to what band you should be in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it Martins Money Saving site? heres the link:Council Tax Cashback: Get £1000s rebated by forcing a rebanding | MoneySavingExpert: Consumer Revenge, Credit Cards, Shopping, Bank Charges, Cheap Flights and more, there was a programme on tonight but I missed it...ITV1's Tonight Friday 26 Jan, 8pm on this Council Tax Cashback system..perhaps anyone who watched could enlighten us further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it Martins Money Saving site? heres the link:Council Tax Cashback: Get £1000s rebated by forcing a rebanding | MoneySavingExpert: Consumer Revenge, Credit Cards, Shopping, Bank Charges, Cheap Flights and more, there was a programme on tonight but I missed it...ITV1's Tonight Friday 26 Jan, 8pm on this Council Tax Cashback system..perhaps anyone who watched could enlighten us further.

 

Not unless they're Crusher and his time machine, methinks!!! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn - have gone through all of that and it looks like I'm in the right band afterall - nevermind!

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good question, and one that occurred to me too...

 

I had a quick (relatively speaking) browse this morning, and it looks as I have been paying band D council tax for the last nearly 11 yrs since we bought our house, when from what I could see before the VOA site died on me, most of the houses are band C and according to the calculations, I should be band C... Ooooh....

Now because I am end of terrace and 4 beds instead of mid and 3, would that justify being one whole band higher? This is what I need to find out... More research beckons... With the 27.3% increase we had a couple of years ago, and no improvement whatsoever in the services, far from it, I would absolutely looove to go after Croydon Council....:mad:

 

I wonder if SOLA 1980 would apply? eg 6 yrs limit? Then again, would council tax come under contract law? Oh, so many questions... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it Martins Money Saving site? heres the link:Council Tax Cashback: Get £1000s rebated by forcing a rebanding | MoneySavingExpert: Consumer Revenge, Credit Cards, Shopping, Bank Charges, Cheap Flights and more, there was a programme on tonight but I missed it...ITV1's Tonight Friday 26 Jan, 8pm on this Council Tax Cashback system..perhaps anyone who watched could enlighten us further.

 

 

Just finished watching actually. he showed how the origianl valutions were arrived at

 

the estate agent were given 300 houses a week to look at in addition to their normal work, weren't allowed to enter the houses so just drove down the streets going d, d, e, d, etc etc!!!!

 

he then just showed ppl what to do to check their band and other ppls, value of house and stuff and refered to his website with the link above u should b able to do it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BW,

 

thing is, the actual council wont get a say, if the valuation officer says its a valid re band then they have to go along with that.

 

Or thats what I'm hoping cos' I reckon I'm owed about £1.5k (minimum!) by North Somerset Council, the gits.

 

:-x

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very exciting. I live in a terraced street of identical houses and 1 neighbour out of the 5 I've checked so far is in a band lower. The question is should I challenge it?

 

 

I'm in a similar position. I live in a large Victorian House that's been split into 4 flats and have found out that we are all in the same band except for one flat, who is in a lower band. It looks like the owner challenged the original band back in the early 90's and won, which is great! I moved 5 months ago so still within my 6 months of complaining.

 

I have decided to challenge this. As back-up evidence, I've send the VOA property ad's for similar properties in my area as well as letting them know that one flat in the house is on a lower band and this flat is actually smaller than my flat. I await to hear their response.

 

Also, I'm looking into back-dating on a former property (tiny studio with just a shower - no bath) I lived in for 3 years. I was actually paying band c rates but judging from old records for property prices in or near my road, I reckon I should have been in band a. I will be challenging this too.

 

The thing is is that you need to be armoured before you state your claim. Send them as much info. and documents on why you should be banded differently. Good luck! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar position. I live in a large Victorian House that's been split into 4 flats and have found out that we are all in the same band except for one flat, who is in a lower band. It looks like the owner challenged the original band back in the early 90's and won, which is great! I moved 5 months ago so still within my 6 months of complaining.

 

I have decided to challenge this. As back-up evidence, I've send the VOA property ad's for similar properties in my area as well as letting them know that one flat in the house is on a lower band and this flat is actually smaller than my flat. I await to hear their response.

 

Also, I'm looking into back-dating on a former property (tiny studio with just a shower - no bath) I lived in for 3 years. I was actually paying band c rates but judging from old records for property prices in or near my road, I reckon I should have been in band a. I will be challenging this too.

 

The thing is is that you need to be armoured before you state your claim. Send them as much info. and documents on why you should be banded differently. Good luck! :)

 

 

Just found out in order to claim from a former property, I would have to approach the new occupiers to challenge the band then if they win, then I can get a rebate too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've just taken the plunge and phoned them for an investigation. Just hope it don't backfire!

 

3 houses out of the 30 on my side of the street are in Band B, whereas mine and all the others are in Band C. The 3 that are B are identical (if not actually bigger with extensions) to mine. Some houses have an extra bedroom but you wouldn't be able to tell from the outside.

 

They said it would take up to 6 weeks to investigate. Not sure if this is like a proper reassesment or jus tthem working out why there's discrepencies between identical houses.

"Be reasonable, demand the impossible"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this at the beginning of Jan and checked mine.

All of our street except 3 houses are Band B

1 house with very large extension is band D

1 4 bed with integral garage is Band C

and us a 3 bed end of terrace with small extention (all other houses have larger extention) is Band C

 

Ours was changed in 1993 I assume due to a sale but I lodged an appeal.

Spoke to the local VOA office aaand although we have been here 6 years they say they will consider it and give me their decision in 28 days (which is up next week). The lady I spoke to said if they agree I will be re-banded and refunded but if they don't agree then I cannot take it to tribunal as I am outside of the 6month time limit.

 

So I am just waiting to here from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this at the beginning of Jan and checked mine.

All of our street except 3 houses are Band B

1 house with very large extension is band D

1 4 bed with integral garage is Band C

and us a 3 bed end of terrace with small extention (all other houses have larger extention) is Band C

 

Ours was changed in 1993 I assume due to a sale but I lodged an appeal.

Spoke to the local VOA office aaand although we have been here 6 years they say they will consider it and give me their decision in 28 days (which is up next week). The lady I spoke to said if they agree I will be re-banded and refunded but if they don't agree then I cannot take it to tribunal as I am outside of the 6month time limit.

 

So I am just waiting to here from them.

 

On Martin's website, many peole have challenged the VOA's decision. despite being outside the 6 month limit There was even a man who got a rejection on THREE separate occasions then in the end they reduced his band. He kept challenging every rejection and they probably got fed up!!!! Mind you, he did provide great a watertight case as to the reason why he felt he should be downgraded.

Good luck! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wondered if anyone knew where I stand with querying incorrect council tax banding on a house I rent out?

 

I lived in the property for 5 years and since then I have rented it out. I believe the banding has been incorrect the whole time so I should be inline to recieve some money back but I don't know if I can query it because although I am the owner I no longer pay the council tax bills

 

Help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wondered if anyone knew where I stand with querying incorrect council tax banding on a house I rent out?

 

I lived in the property for 5 years and since then I have rented it out. I believe the banding has been incorrect the whole time so I should be inline to recieve some money back but I don't know if I can query it because although I am the owner I no longer pay the council tax bills

 

Help please?

 

We have never met our landlord, as we rent through an agency. If however we are renting YOUR place, we can share the rebate if you buy the beers for the barbie in the summer :)

 

EDIT: Just realised our house was only build 3 years ago.... sorry it's not us then, but you can still buy the beers!

Lloyds TSB (C.Acc) **WON - Fully Settled**

NatWest - £1367.96 - N1 Filed - AQ Compl

Lloyds TSB - Select Loan PPI - £4629.52 - N1 Filed - Settlement rejected

Lloyds TSB Credit Card - £373.48 - N1 Filed

MBNA Credit Card - £791.52 - N1 Filed

Capital One - £746.67 - N1 Filed -** Settlement awaited **

Halifax Credit Card - £836.12 - N1 Filed

Paragon Personal Finance - S.A.R 15/12/2006

Littlewoods - £834.43 - N1 Filed

Barclaycard - £1145.00 - N1 Filed

My Wife:

Natwest Current Account - £1197.98 - N1 Filed at Court

Capital One - £1150.94 - N1 Filed - **Settlement offer rejected **

Littlewoods - £1405.48 - N1 Filed

8-) PROUD TO BE DEALING WITH MY DEBTS! 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying you lived there for 5 years but no longer live there so the council payments are in someone else's name?

 

Well whoever is paying the council payments on your property will have to query the banding with the VOA and if successful then not only will the present council tax payer get a rebate and reduced monthly bill but you will also be able to claim back on the money you paid in whilst you were living there too.

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...