Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that nuanced response Bazza. I was hoping to argue that I did turn left into the road and what happens on the road I turned into is a moot point. Best, Chris
    • Hi mitm are you able to DM me? Need some advice and rather just take off here for now. Won’t let me DM you as a new user. 
    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abbey taking the P.


madmedic112
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I emailed abbey last week and got a reply telling me to call them to make sure i did send the email! i called and they said they will deal with my request within 7 to 14 days! However they said that under the "DPA" they only have to go back 5 years! i'll settle for that! WATCH THIS SPACE!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might also be worth telling you all about the time they charged me £330 in charges in one day! i called them and explained that i have just split from my fiancee and that the situation had become acrimonious! they gave me £140 back as "a good will thingy", see they aint all bad!!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have requested my "fines" from abbey via email 41 days ago, i called them today to find out what the delay is, i was told that the abbey "do not give that sort of infomation on its own", however they can send a statement covering the last 5!!! years and will take a further 28 days! something is better than nothing! whach this space, the other problem is the indian call center not understanding english law, they get told what to say and stick to it by hook or crook!

Fingers crossed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to the IC at the very least.

 

They already have too much disregard for the laws of this country.

 

http://www.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/cms/documentUploads/DPA%20Complaint%20Form%20.pdf

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.

 

I don't see why we should give them an inch - they certainly wouldn't if (and when) the shoe is/was on the other foot.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forum clean up - your claim threads have been merged. Please try to keep all posts about your claim to a single thread only. Thanks :)

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Guess what?! I called the shabbey today to chase up my request for statments going back 6 years as we are now only 3 days off of the 40 days allowed, I was told that it was only a "SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST" that must be answered within 40 days!!!!!!:mad::confused::shock:

I really really hate the shabbey!!!!!!

Oh well, good things come and all that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what?! I called the shabbey today to chase up my request for statments going back 6 years as we are now only 3 days off of the 40 days allowed, I was told that it was only a "SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST" that must be answered within 40 days!!!!!!:mad::confused::shock:

I really really hate the shabbey!!!!!!

Oh well, good things come and all that!

 

Did you send them a Subject Access Request using the template in the library or something similar and did you send the £10 statutory fee? If not please read the FAQs as you will need to start the process again. It is really important that you have an understanding of the process before you embark on making a claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right iv been nice and i have tried not to get nasty! but sod it! i have waited 60 days and ..... nothing! Subject access request sent today! and I have also just seen the APR calculator! Fantastic! a £35 cost in June 2004 is now worth £40.29! Result! A Profit of £5.29!!!

Thanks again for your help and support one and all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Right, time to update you all, iv not been on for a while (life being what it is!), Subject Acess Request sent for both my Shabby accounts, with my £20 fee, (£10 for each acc) 4 days later i got my, "sorry your not happy, we are dealing with your request" letter, Statements recived about 7 days after that!

After a rough look at them they owe about £1,750!!!!!!

:D

Am I right in saying that I can, LEGALLY,:o charge 8% from the date of the penalty charge???:confused: for each and every charge?:oops:

Thanks

Madmedic112.

P.S.

I would just like to say a big THANK YOU to all at the bank action group! for all your help and all the downloadable forms! Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok now that you have the statements you need to go into the Templates Library found in my signature on the bottom and you need to do a spreadsheet calculation for all the charges you have. Yes you can claim back 8% on each transaction but ONLY when you reach the court stages which will probably happen but you cannot send in asking for 8% before court. If you need any other help then just let me know. You need to now send in the Preliminary Approach for Repayment letter followed by the LBA letter either 14days later or whenever they reply, whichever is sooner.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Got back from my holiday today to find that they have paid £575 into my account as a GOGW! Now if they will cough up the rest i will be very happy indeed! A thank you and refusel letter going out tomorrow. Watch this space!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all, tell me, I have 2 account with the shAbbey, one is a joint and one is a single account. The single account is fine and not a problem, the joint account is the one I am making the £1536 claim againts, I came back from holiday to find (As sited above) that £575 had been paid into my personal account as a GOGW, HOWEVER £2072 had been taken out of my personal account by the shAbbey!!! This is the total amount outstanding from the jonit account. (including a £1000 Autherised O/D) Is this unlawfull? PLEASE HELP!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont think so sorry! they can take money out of any account that has your name on the top, ( unless it is a truestee of a childs accountas they assume that is not your money) it is naughty but not illegal. id still give them hell over doing it without your permission or any prior warning tho. have you got a parachute account set up? id move everythign away form grabbey and await the outcome of the corurt case, they will try and faff you abotu but dont take it. it is all a dance and they are leading at the moment but you are choosing the tune!

me against the abbey Paid in full (donation made)

me against the woolwich Paid in full(donation made)

me against HSBC Paid in full(donation made)

 

 

beware the scrapbooker, for she has a long memory and sharp knives :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello all, long time no post! just to let you all know that today (30-12-06) a friend of mine has just recived a letter from Nat West to offer full settlement of £1450! good news for him!

As for me? well today i recived 2 letters, one from the abbey saying that I have not given them any details of the claim! (them have lost the paperwork!) and one from the court saying the are going to defend ALL of the claim! just my luck!!!

Should I send them the list of charges for the THIRD time? or just wait for my day in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a letter from Abbey today saying they are going to fight me in cort! HA! cant wait, they have also asked for details of how I have come to my figure of £1575, even though i have already sent the details twice!! Shoul i send it again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1919 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...