Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Open + Direct & Wescot debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am looking for advice for my husband and I over a matter that resulted from a mistake on my part regarding the full payment owed to Open + Direct under a "buy now, pay in a year" scheme started on 28th December 2002. As the household typist, I deal with all correspondence even if my name is not on it, so my husband as debtor signed all of the letters we sent to them, usually without reading them, as for 35 years I had never got it wrong so he trusted my accountancy and correspondence skills. There is always a first time…..

I sent a cheque to Open + Direct for £1000 “in full and final settlement” on 12th December 2003 by Special Delivery post, to arrive by 6th January 2004, the “cut-off date before the credit agreement kicked in, not realising that I had picked up an agreement from the previous year with the same company, which was for £1000 (and which had been paid already). I should have sent them £1300 to clear the current outstanding amount.

When my husband telephoned them just before Christmas 2003, Open + Direct stated that they had received our cheque and the account was cleared.

On 30th December 2003 my husband telephoned Open + Direct to enquire when he could expect to receive their letter confirming the clearance of the agreement, and was told that no cheque had been received. I had checked and knew that the Special Delivery letter had been received by Open + Direct on 14th December 2003.

However, not wanting charges to kick in, I sent another cheque for £1000 Recorded Delivery, and confirmed that it was received on 2nd January 2004. So they had two cheque totalling £2000 for a £1300 debt, and we expected £700 back, less, no doubt, a small administration charge for their inconvenience (whether justified or not).

My husband telephoned them on 2nd January and they confirmed receipt of the second £1000 cheque “in full and final settlement” of the debt.

I cancelled the Direct Debit in late January 2004, signed at the time of the original agreement, as the debt had been paid in full as far as we were concerned.

On 9th February 2004 my husband received a letter from Open + Direct stating that they had added £25 to our account for doing this. What account? We checked the agreement and discovered my mistake, but they had received two cheques totalling £2000 so where was the problem. Apparently they had now “lost” one so the credit agreement began for the outstanding £300.

I wrote to them on 11th February 2004 stating that we thought them disingenuous for stating on two separate occasions that they had received the cheques and then “losing” one, putting us in debt. It was clear from both my letters that we believed the £1000 to be the amount owed “in full and final settlement”. They could have at least alerted my husband just after Christmas 2003 when he spoke with them on the telephone that £1000 would not clear the debt, so that at least the second cheque could have been made out for the correct amount. We were so disgusted that we sent them £355.69 to pay for a ‘fridge taken out on a similar agreement the previous September, which still had six months to run. We could have paid the full amount of £1300 and can prove this financially

I sent a Recorded Delivery letter to Open + Direct on 21st May 2004, demanding some response from them, as we had heard nothing from them since the original agreement was taken out, other than their letter regarding the cancelled direct debit.

They responded on 27th May 2004 saying that if we paid them £1913.39 (for the outstanding £300) they would accept it as a special offer, because the £1000 just stopped our account from going into arrears. We actually owed them £3105.96. What!!!

On 9th July 2004 my husband dictated a letter stating that is must be obvious to them that it had been a genuine mistake on my part, and asking what had happened to the second £1000? He also asked them to spell his name correctly, something they seemed incapable of doing. No response from them whatsoever was received..

On28th May 2005 we received a letter dated 12th May 2005 from Open + Direct saying that we were £1020.24 in debt. My husband telephoned them on 30th May 2005 and spoke to a gentleman who, having been given the story, promised to put the account into suspension whilst investigations took place, send us letters from them that we were missing, apparently and get a member of staff to telephone us within a few days.

We received another letter from Open + Direct on 10th June 2005 saying that we owed £1030.26 together with £25 for sending this letter to us, with no mention of any investigation taking place.

My husband sent e-mails to Open + Direct on 10th, 20th, 21st June, 22nd and finally 29th July 2005 asking for the promised missing documentation that we had “apparently” been sent previously, and asking why no member of staff had telephoned us as promised. We have heard nothing from Open + Direct since.

Meanwhile I had been busy on the internet trying to find out who the regulatory body was that covered transactions such as ours. Open + Direct’s website did not list the information, so I wrote to the FSA on 29th August 2005, explaining the situation and enclosing full documentation.

They telephoned me to say that it was not in their remit and suggested I write to Trading Standards, which I did on 7th November 2005. They said it was not in their remit either, as Open + Direct are based in Belfast.

We received a letter from Wescot Credit Services on 28th December 2005 (dated 19th December 2005) stating that they had been assigned the debt by Open + Direct and that they wanted £3630.96 to clear the account.

I wrote to Wescot Credit Services on 29th December 2005, enclosing all documentation and explaining why we felt this was all wrong.

We received a reply on 2nd January 2006 stating that Wescot Credit Services would make enquiries and meanwhile the account would be frozen.

We heard nothing more until 12th June 2006 when we received a red Final Demand from Wescot Credit Services for £3830.96, including £200 legal charges(?).

I rang them and said that we were still awaiting the results of their investigations, and asked what was happening. They said we should write to Open + Direct and ask for the documentation that we are missing (purportedly) to be sent to us, which we did, but predictably there was no response.

On 27th June 2006 Wescot Credit Services send us a letter threatening court action, and the possibility of forcing us to sell our house to pay the debt!

I wrote back to them on 29th June enclosing paperwork and asking why they were threatening court action when we were still waiting to hear about their investigations, and pointing out that at the time the unsecured loan was taken out by my husband he was not on the title deeds of the house so the fact that he is now joint owner could have had no bearing on the granting of the loan, as they claimed.

On 5th July 2006 Wescot Credit Services wrote to say that they were still investigating, but on 6th July 2006 we received a two page legal rebuttal saying that they had the right to put a charge over our property if we did not pay, but that they would contact Open + Direct to see where the missing paperwork was.

On 11th January we received a notice of court action from Wescot Credit Services, the first communication since 5th July 2006. They are claiming £3630.96 now, and the case is to be heard in Kingston-upon-Hull.

I think that we should respond in that we are admitting part of the debt and offering to pay the £300 in full, together with reasonable interest since 6th January 2004. We also want the case heard at our local court not 300 miles away. Our defence is that we do not know the truth about what happened to the 2 x £1000 that Open + Direct received, and believe that they did not tell my husband that we were in error in stating that the cheques were “in full and final settlement” because they wanted us to become committed to a credit repayment whereas clearly if we paid in full they made nothing out of us. The lack of communication when promised, ignoring our letters and not sending copies of theirs that they purportedly sent to us will also be raised.

We do not want to go to court, but believe that attention should be drawn to the ridiculous amounts of money being made from outrageous interest rates, more so when we can show that the company had the money and yet somehow lost part of it. Any advice will be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really feel for you Rosepetal. You must feel like you have tried everything to work this problem out and yet it has just escalated to a ridiculous extent. If it is any comfort to you, the fact that you have gone to such lengths to try and sort this out reasonably will work very much in your favour should this get to court.

 

Firstly, Westcot cannot place a charge on your house without obtaining a CCJ against you first. Are you aware that they have? I would be very interested to see how they worded this part of their letter because it sounds very much like they are misepresenting the legal position.

 

In the meantime, you will need to send a SAR request (template in the library) to Open + Direct asking them to provide all of the information which they hold on you. You will need to send a £10 postal order to cover the fee for this. I am presuming that the Data Protection legislation covers Northern Ireland but, no doubt someone will correct me if I am wrong.

 

You also need to send a CCA request and an SAR request to Westcot. If they can't come up a true copy of your signed Agreement then, they cannot enforce the debt. I am sure that they will have it easily to hand if they are intending to take you to court ;) and they certainly should not have to return to the original creditor to get it - please let me know if you need any help with the wording but, it would be helpful to know a bit more about their letter threatening to make you sell the house before we write it.

 

Hope this helps

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is awful, I have had dealings with Wescot and they are not the most understanding of people all they care about is getting the money. I would get confirmation from your bank that the 2 £1000 cheques were banked by open + direct and go to court and prove that you have paid!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am also having problems with these idiots.

Some help info read the Credit Service Association member code of practice.

available to download in PDF format, good to refer to.

 

Wescot break them all the time, point out which one they break and submit a complaint on CSA website, has to be printed and posted.

Example below

 

 

www.csa-uk.com/index.htm

 

Very worth while, I am in the process already with another company but will do same for Wescot.

 

Also visit the Office of Fair Trading website -

 

www.oft.gov.uk/Business/licence/default.htm

 

They will have a consumer credit license to operate under

 

and read debt collection guidance they also will be worth seeing which ones if not all of those guidelines they infringe and let Andy Lowther know full details on there website.

 

Also sent the OFT a copy of your complaint to the CSA.

 

Mr. Andy Lowther

Office of Fair Trading

1C/015

FREEPOST

London

EC4B 4AH

 

[email protected]

 

Direct Line (020) 7211 8765

Fax (020) 7211 8877

 

Don’t let these idiots win and complain like hell!

 

Good luck

 

By the way started that many legal fights, I won 2 so far, yes I OWE this helpful site site some donations which will gladly follow shortly. Just preparing to cases that are certainly going to court not mentioning any name but check Lowell Financial Limited’s section.

 

Will update info and donations shortly.................

 

Total number of records: 273 Matching records: 4

 

 

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

PO Box 137

Dunedin House

45 Percy Street

Hull

HU2 8HF

 

Telephone: 01482 590 590

Facsimile: 01482 590 591

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website:

Region: NE

Services: ACFGLT

Areas Covered: UK

Type of Membership Full

Contact Person: Mr N Conway

 

 

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

Midland House

64 Oswald Street

 

Glasgow

G1 4PL

 

Telephone: 0141 300 5300

Facsimile: 0141 300 5301

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website:

Region: SC

Services: ACFGLT

Areas Covered:

Type of Membership Branch-Location

Contact Person: Mr N Conway

 

 

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

Kyleshill House

1 Glencairn Street

 

Saltcoats

KA21 5JT

 

Telephone: 0141 300 5300

Facsimile: 0141 300 5301

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website:

Region:

Services: ABCKLOQTU

Areas Covered: UK

Type of Membership Branch-Location

Contact Person: Mr N Conway

 

 

Wescot Credit Services Ltd

Jarratt House

The Maltings

Jarratt Street

Hull

HU1 3HA

 

Telephone: 01482 590 590

Facsimile: 01482 590 501

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website:

Region:

Services: ABCKLOQTU

Areas Covered: UK

Type of Membership Branch-Location

Contact Person: Mr N Conway

 

SECTION TAKE FROM CSA COMPLAINT FORM>>>>>>>

 

 

In what way do you think the member has violated our Code of Practice?

 

s1 d & (vii) – XXXXX have failed to comply with ALL my requests for information as well as s7 of The Data Protection Act, Subject Access Request.

 

s3 (b) – XXXXX have continuously harassed and intimidated me into agreeing to a payment plan after threatening Court action for a alleged debt they have failed to prove is outstanding or they have the right to pursue.

 

s3 (e) – XXXX have sent numerous correspondence to chase this alleged debt and at one point a received nine letters over a period of four days.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal (trading style XXXXX) advising that County Court action will now commence and adding Court fees £XXX, Solicitors Cost £XXX and Interest of £XXX.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal advising legal proceedings are now being prepared for Court and failure to pay within 3 days a CCJ could be registered against me.

 

s3 (l) - XXXXX have failed to take ANY steps to show or verify that this alleged debt is legally due.

 

s3 (q) – failed to take into consideration any of the information supplied or respond promptly and accurately with information requested.

 

s3 ® – XXXX have failed to supply and of the information requested since XXXXX

 

 

 

What did you ask the CSA Member to do to put it right?

 

I have continuously denied this debt since XXXXX and also asked XXXXXX to supply further information on numerous occasions without reply.

 

CREDIT SERVICE ASSOCIATION CONTACT

 

 

Credit Services Association

Wingrove House

Ponteland Road

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE5 3DP

 

 

Telephone:

00 44 (0)191 286 5656

Fax:

00 44 (0)191 286 0900

Email:Complaints [email protected]

 

 

Claire Aynsley

Code & Complaince Executive

CSA code of practice.pdf

OFT Debt collection guidelines.pdf

OFT Complaint form.doc

CSA Complaint Form.pdf

CSA complaint procedure.pdf

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

thanks for the info

 

Barclaycard Student credit card £400 partial refund received, S.A.R -

Open & Direct Finance- extortionate, cca to Rockwell debt collection they ran away, now with Bryan Carter, no cca 17/03/08 sent back to Open

Pugsley v Littlwoods, have not received the signed credit agreement only quoting reg of 1983

Pugsley v Fashion World JD williams, 17/03 2008 Debt Managers returning file to JD williams as they could not supply the credit agreement

Capital one MCOL Settled in full

Smile lba settled in full

advice is given informally and without liability and without prejudice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...