Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Björn Ulvaeus appeared on stage in East Yorkshire at a conference held at the Bridlington Spa.View the full article
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

foaf26907 vs Halifax (& Natwest)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all I have been impressed by the number of cases and I am determined to put mine through. I've recieved back from them a print out of charges from local branch over the last 6 years totalinbg £1301.

I have some questions though.

 

1. I am concerned because I do not have an agreed overdraft on my account as I opened the account just before I was made redundant at work and went immediately on to Benefits the Halifax refused to upgrade it to a full checking account with OD facilities as I no longer had a salary coming in. Can I still apply for refund of charges? I know one of teh letters dose state "refund for all charges" but is this OK for me?

 

2. As I sent my DPA request to my local branch St Albans and they replied am I better of sticking with them or should I go directly to the Head office & just enclose a copy of the reply with my next letter ?

 

Thanks Foaf

P.S Has anyone out there had a refund from St Albans branch ?

I'm also waiting a respone to my DPA request from Natwest as well.

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

All the answers to your questions are on the forum, Honest!

 

Please read the FAQ's and everything else 1st beforehand.

 

It doesn't matter if you have an OD or not, infact alot of people dont have one.

 

If you had a response from the branch then stick with that, they have an intenal mail system in any case!

 

Hope this helps,

 

Lou

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks I did try doing a "search" to get answers but couldn't find answers but thank you for your quick reply.

 

DPA Halifax 13/04/06

Reply List of charges 18/04/06

 

 

DPA Natwest 13/04/06

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Just out of interest id halifax end all your statements? Im just checking the amount is accurte as some bank have been known to accidently "miss" charges off !!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually I got a list a charges excerpt of letter recieved from Nikki Rice St albans

 

 

Data Protection Act disclosure request.

Turning to your request for an exhaustive list of charges. Whilst I acknowledge it is your legal right to apply formally under the Data Protection Act for all the records we hold on you, your request is very specific. There is normally a £10 charge for a formal request, however in the interests of customer service I have provided a list of your bank charges for the last six years, free of charge. As well as the charges on the list there was a charge that debited on the 19th April for the sum of £39 and a charge pending to debit on the 31st May for the sum of £28. if you still want to pursue a formal request please let me know.

I understand that you would like to receive information about our manual intervention on specific transactions. We are under no statutory obligation to record the information you require and thus are unable to comply with your request.

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Ok that seems fine, just thought Id warn you as its happened before to a couple of people!

 

Lou x

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read a very informative thread on Halifax's refusal to discolse MI. I also got the same letter but didn't think to follow it up. I saw in the other thread the way to go about it is to request an appointment to view the info at the bank. Does this have to be done ? there was some reference to the bank possibly using it in court ? I have already sent my 2nd letter as they sent me a print out of all charges. SHould I wait for a response and request an appointment to view MI at the branch?

thanks

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read a very informative thread on Halifax's refusal to discolse MI. I also got the same letter but didn't think to follow it up. I saw in the other thread the way to go about it is to request an appointment to view the info at the bank. Does this have to be done ? there was some reference to the bank possibly using it in court ? I have already sent my 2nd letter as they sent me a print out of all charges. SHould I wait for a response and request an appointment to view MI at the branch?

thanks

 

I wouldn't worry too much about that, you can show you have asked for the information and you were refused, should it get to court (which is doubtful!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

progress receieved letter today in response to my LPA. Offer of £245 usual splurge about my responsibitly to make sure funds are available yada, yada, yada.

 

I will decline & request full payment within 14 days and start preparing by court docs.

 

Do I need to send another LPA or is a letter of refusal enough.

 

BTW contact details

 

Louise Curran

Customer Realtions Manager

Core Business Team

Customer Relations

PO Box 548 Leeds LS1 1WU

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way; the following passage from the DPA should be informative regarding their refusal to disclose manual intervention data:

 

7. - (1) Subject to the following provisions of this section and to sections 8 and 9, an individual is entitled-

 

© to have communicated to him in an intelligible form-

 

(i) the information constituting any personal data of which that individual is the data subject, and

 

(ii) any information available to the data controller as to the source of those data, and

(d) where the processing by automatic means of personal data of which that individual is the data subject for the purpose of evaluating matters relating to him such as, for example, his performance at work, his creditworthiness, his reliability or his conduct, has constituted or is likely to constitute the sole basis for any decision significantly affecting him, to be informed by the data controller of the logic involved in that decision-taking.

So - basically if they are making decisions significantly affecting you, then they ARE REQUIRED to produce evidence of their logic for each and every decision. i.e. they must provide you with details of every manual intervention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Filed claim online. Is it OK that I rejected the offer they made and said they had to refund me in full ? i.e that I didn't accept the offer as partial payment.

 

Total claim now up to £1800.00

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filed claim online. Is it OK that I rejected the offer they made and said they had to refund me in full ?

 

Of course it is. It's your money, go for the full amount.

 

Good luck.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

To quote Dora the Explorer " Hey we did it"

Full refund with standard letter saying no admission of liablity blah, blah, blah

 

Thank so much for all your help.

Now on to Natwest

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

gladly completed survey, made donation and booking family holiday

 

may get some more holiday spending money off Natwest :)

 

Thanks every1 for all your help & advice

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Thanks Foaf26907

Claim filed 30/01/07

2nd Request £1500 nov 06

Prelim Request £1500 16/10

Lloyds Data Protection Act 07/08

------------------------------------

Abbey Credit card settled £266 11/06

NatWest paid in full £3770 04/08/06

Hurray Halifax Paid in full £1820.00 28/05/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...