Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LLoyds have just offered £750 refund vice £3500


minnienee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

People need to stop panicking when this happens to them! This is exactly what they are trying to achieve with this tactic.

 

The way I see it there are 2 situations here. Firstly you have send them a prelim and/or LBA but have not yet filed for the charges, Secondly you have filed a claim for the money.

 

The first situation I would say you will have to accept the monty, and if it isnt the full amount owed, proceed to file for the rest. However, you cannot then claim 8% statutory interest on this £750! You can claim 8% on the amount you are claiming for only. If you are claiming contractual interest that is a different matter as it is added before the claim is filed. In that situation I would personally just subtract the £750 from the current debt rather than dividing the amount between the sumber of charges then subtracting the result from each, the reason being that even though they have refunded the money, they have still had use of it and so still owe the interest on it.

 

The second situation, where you have filed a claim at court, I would just reject the whole amount. Remember, you have not agreed to accept the £750. You have not signed anything to that effect. Firstly I would recommend you dont spend it! Then the steps I would take (and remember this is just my personal opinion, I am not a lawyer) in this situation are:

 

1. If they have written to tell you this is a refund of charges, I would write to Lloyds/SC&M with something like the following:

 

 

Dear XXX

 

Thank you for your letter dated xxx

 

Unfortunately I am unable to accept your offer of settlement in relation to the claim number XXXXX as it is not for the full amount owed.

 

The full amount currently owed as of the date of this letter is £XXX.XX. For a breakdown of this amount I would refer you to the enclosed current schedule of charges. Should you wish to reconsider and offer the full amount, please do not hesitate to make contact.

 

Yours XX

 

 

Mindzai

 

 

Or if they have not written anything but have just refunded the money, I would write something like

 

 

Dear XXX

 

Thank you for the recent credit of £750 to my account.

 

I have not recieved any correspondance from yourself explaining why this credit has taken place, so in case it is the result of a mistake on your part I have not yet drawn on the amount.

 

i would be grateful if you would write to inform me why this amount has been credited.

 

Yours XX

 

 

 

Mindzai

 

Then if they reply saying it is a refund of charges, send the first letter.

 

The bottom line is, if you have started the claim already, I would not accept the money as part settlement, and I would not spend any of it. Just carry on as normal after sending them a rejection letter.

 

Again pleas ebear in mind this is just what I would do. However if none of the above helps, just remember not to panick if this happens! there are so many threads about this being posted at the moment which shows Lloyds' tactic is working. Remain calm, take your time and in keep control at all times and you will be fine.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hi jack the thread for a mo. Hi mindzai :) - my problem is that they put the money into my husbands bank......... and told us after the event.

We had spent some of it without originally knowing it was there, as it was put into the very overdrawn account. It was also well after the 14 day deadline I gave them. My husband had recieved the letter before I served the papers and he had spoken to them on the phone to confirm the money was there, unfortunately, when you both work all the hours God sends etc etc you do miss out on conversations, or think you have told someone something, when you havn't.

 

The next day, I went to the court and filed the papers...and at this point we had had the money for a couple of days, and some of it had been spent. After we got hte letter we wrote to the LTSB the standard rejection letter saying ta, but only in part payment etc etc.

 

SOOOOO.......the papers we filed were a bit incorrect! And I am sure this is a tactic used by LTSB to put a spanner in the works to put off and confuse the customers.

 

Should I wait for an acknowledgement of service from them, with obviously a disputed amount on it. Or should I ammend the ammount now (and how?)The papers were sent to the LTSB on the 15th and will be deemed to have been served on 17th

Hope you can help - anyone??? I have sucessfully "done" the Halifax and and still in shock that that worked! BUt LTSB are little B*gg*rs arn't they?

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have spent the money and written to them accepting it I dont see that you really have any choice but to ammend your claim. The court can give you the form to do this, and there is a non-reclaimable charge for this.

 

Unless anyone else has another suggestion, but I dont know of any other options.

 

And I am sure this is a tactic used by LTSB to put a spanner in the works to put off and confuse the customers.

 

Damn right it is! Amongst other things this is certainly designed to confuse.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to LLoyds (Rejection of settlement figure of £750 -using CAG template) accepting figure as part of full settlement (£3,500) giving them until 12 jan to reply. Nothing so far from them, I assume this is normal?:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't wait for their replies, just carry on as normal on your own schedule.

Mindzai & Lucid vs Lloyds TSB

 

Mindzai's Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

Joint Account - Partial settlement offer rejected

_________________________

Spreadsheet for compound contractual interest and statutory (s69) interest:

Download v1.9 [Tested with Excel 97-2007 and OpenOffice 2]

PLEASE NOTE: You should fully research contractual interest before you use that functionality of this spreadsheet. If in any doubt please use it to calculate 8% interest under s69 County Courts Act 1984.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well people, I did not get offered £750 but Lloyds actually paid £750 into my account. I have replied, Thank You but I will accept in part payment. In Mondays post, the N1 and account claim including interest less £750 goes to the local county court.

I will wait with baited breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're slightly ahead of you old chap (we have received lloyds defence today and it is pretty unremarkable) - keep ploughing onwards, we've all got a way to go yet i think!

Regards, Seesaw :)

 

04Nov06 Registered with CAG, completed S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

06Dec06 Statements received.

08Dec06 Sent pre-lim letter requesting repayment of £1615 with schedule of charges

23Dec06 Received initial rejection response from recovery centre.

30Dec06 LBA sent with schedule of charges

12Jan07 £750 partial settlement offer received

14Jan07 Rejection settlement letter sent

19Jan07 N1 Claim filed at county court

09Feb07 Acknowledgement of service from Lloyds

19Feb07 Notice that defence has been filed & AQ provided

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for message. My N1 came back today from the court, the interest claimed was not correct after I took that £750 off the gross total. They also said that I should include a claim for interest up to 'date of judgement' at 'a daily rate of interest what ever that it.

Dont we learn a lot.

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for message. My N1 came back today from the court, the interest claimed was not correct after I took that £750 off the gross total. They also said that I should include a claim for interest up to 'date of judgement' at 'a daily rate of interest what ever that it.

Dont we learn a lot.

Regards.

R U STILL ONLINE
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...