Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SJPN - Phone went flat - didn't realise i had not paid for train fare when challenged. - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 510 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, I’m back! 
 

i hope you all had a lovely Christmas and all best for the new year. 
 

i have a dilemma and speaking on behalf of my girlfriend.

 

She received a penalty from an inspector but was never issued a penalty fare (£20) and was given a prosecution one instead.


She expected the £20 fare which she was happy to pay for but just today she reviewed a SJPN ordering her to pay £135!!! She received no reply regarding her reasoning of not paying. 
 

I have copied and pasted what she sent to them which she had received on the 28th December and was received late due to Royal Mail Strikes:

 

In response to the notice I would like to firstly apologise for the error on my part and I take full responsibility for this. 

 

Secondly before I begin I would like to highlight that the delay in my response is due to the fact that I received this notice on the 28th December 2022 - 17 days after the date it was issued. The letter states I needed to respond within 14 days making it late by 3 days already. 


I believe this was due to the numerous royal mail strikes that have occurred during this month, however for this reason I hope the lateness of my response will not implicate me further. 

 

I constantly travel through Thameslink to commute to work in London  and have never failed to pay for my fare, apart from this one occasion I did make a genuine mistake that I’ am taking full responsibility for. 


On this particular day I was rushing for my train whilst trying to purchase my parking and train ticket, I had a low percentage battery already so I was trying to buy these as quickly as possible before it dying completely. 


After paying for my parking I honestly thought I managed to get past to the point of payment as I had used my Apple pay to purchase my ticket through the Trainline app ( as I always do). Once managed to run on the train my battery was completely dead and I did not think much else of it. 


At St Albans a staff member came on asking for tickets and I was honest with the gentleman explaining that I had no physical ticket to show and that mine was on my phone. 

 

I understand now after he explained to me that  this is a common excuse train jumpers use to get out of paying for their tickets but this was a genuine mistake on my part.


Once I got to work and managed to charge my phone I checked my app to realise I hadn’t actually purchased it and I was mortified. I immediately jumped onto the website the train staff had given me and wrote down a brief explanation of the situation. 


I have no reason to not paying for my fares, I have a railcard and rail travel vouchers to use towards tickets, I use the train services every week to travel to work and have never failed to pay for my ticket. 

 

I apologise greatly for my poor/lack of judgement on that particular day, moving forward I plan on purchasing physical tickets at the station to avoid this ever happening again.

 

She received the letter late and went past the 14 days which probably explains why she had received the extortionate court fine.

 

is anyone able to assist with this or give advice?

 

Would really appreciate it!

 

many thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to SJPN - Phone went flat - didn't realise i had not paid for train fare when challenged. - help

she has not received the SJPN 'because' she missed any initial appeals window due to their time limits it doesn't , by default, operate like that. She has not received a fine of £135, it is a proposed figure, should this not be resolved before the court date.

 

it will be down to her reply not containing actual evidence which they require to corroborate her reply and explanation toward how this happened.

 

appeal again to the email address on the (TfL?) initial letter, apologising for the error, offering to pay all out of court expenses in order to settle this before court, to avoid a criminal record, because of XYZ reasons. include any evidence of attempts to pay, phone records, and proof of existence of the previous/existing tickets like a railcard and rail travel vouchers etc to show it was a one off mistake, not a purposeful attempt to avoid the fare.

 

it might cost her £135, but it won't result in a criminal record if settled OOC.

 

what date is the SJPN hearing date?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply 👍

 

oh right okay.. may be that isn’t the case then. 

The thing I want to mainly raise with them is that the letter she received to respond back to and give her explanation of events was received past the respond by date. She didn’t have 14 days to respond to. Once she received the letter it had already been 3 days past the date which has given her no chance for them to even consider. I understand based on technicalities yes, she didn’t have a ticket in the end but she wasn’t given a fair chance to explain herself and when she did a decision had already been made.

 
Who knows the person looking into her reasoning may have accepted it so we can’t really judge it at all.
 

Had it not been for RM strikes she would have had her response sent before the 14 days.
 

there isn’t a hearing date as yet but she has to respond with a not guilty or guilty plea. I’ll send over the letter later when I get the chance

 

thank yoh again!

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hakawaka92 said:

Thank you for the reply 👍

 

oh right okay.. may be that isn’t the case then. 

The thing I want to mainly raise with them is that the letter she received to respond back to and give her explanation of events was received past the respond by date. She didn’t have 14 days to respond to. Once she received the letter it had already been 3 days past the date which has given her no chance for them to even consider. - does not matter

 

 

I understand based on technicalities yes, she didn’t have a ticket in the end but she wasn’t given a fair chance to explain herself and when she did a decision had already been made. - no no  decision has been made.

 

Who knows the person looking into her reasoning may have accepted it so we can’t really judge it at all.
 

Had it not been for RM strikes she would have had her response sent before the 14 days.
 

there isn’t a hearing date as yet but she has to respond with a not guilty or guilty plea. I’ll send over the letter later when I get the chance

 

thank yoh again!

.

 

there are 10's of threads here in this forum get reading a good few

send a new pleading letter with evidence. she will not get a criminal record for a human mistake.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...