Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PCN for stopping on zigzag school markings


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 506 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi 

here for a bit of advice...

 

I dropped my wife off at the school one lunchtime stopping for a few seconds on the zigzag lines outside. I thought that the zigzags were only operational in the morning and afternoon for drop-off and pickup but got a PCN from Waltham Forest showing my car stopping and a sign with the times (8am-4pm).

 

There were no signs on the road as I approached the school, nor any directly outside the school and as I turned right into another road to do a u-turn I didn't pass the sign that is shown on the PCN.

 

I have appealed the PCN as there were no signs displaying the times when the markings were operational other than the one further up the road which I didn't pass (there were also no signs saying that CCTV is being used but I believe that this is ok for school markings).

 

Just wondering what my chances of winning the appeal would be and also if I should fight it further should Waltham Forest turn down my appeal.

 

Thanks for reading and any advice welcomed! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are NO time limits or any signs that can ever apply to school zone zigzag lines. they are operational 24/7?

 

WWW.DRIVING.CO.UK

Yellow zig-zag lines on the road are most often seen outside schools, yet many motorists are still unsure as to what they mean.

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply @dx100uk. Most school zigzags that I have seen all have a sign with the operational times. The ones outside the school that I received a PCN for are 8am-4pm so they're not 24 hours.

 

From what I've read white zigzags are 24 hour, yellow ones need to have a accompanying sign indicating the operating hours to be enforceable:

https://www.drivingtesttips.biz/yellow-zig-zag-lines.html?amp

 

My issue is that there should be sufficient signage to show the operating hours so that cars approaching from any direction are aware of the operational times.

 

I think that this is a just reason for appealing the fine but wanted to get the opinion of others with more experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The yellow zigzag line marks the area of the road where parking is prohibited, as it is reserved for another purpose. Therefore, we often see these markings at bus stops or loading and unloading areas. In other words, it is forbidden to park with any vehicle.
 
White zigzags are commonly found either side of pedestrian crossings. They are designed to indicate that parking and overtaking in these zones is strictly prohibited.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anybody know for certain whether the website linked to by @Another Rob is correct?

 

It says:  

  • YELLOW ZIG ZAG LINES WITHOUT SIGNS
  • Yellow zig zag lines without signs to accompany them do not have a Traffic Regulation Order giving the local council powers to issue PCN fines. Therefor [sic] it is technically legal to park on yellow zig zag lines without signs at any time.

However, these zig zag road markings are placed there to advise motorists not to wait or park on these lines for the safety of children and although the local council do not have the powers to enforce penalties, police frequently issue tickets in such cases.

 

Tickets are issued on the grounds of causing an obstruction to either other motorists or pedestrians and not for parking on the yellow zig zag lines directly.  Yellow Zig Zag Lines (drivingtesttips.biz)   (Bits underlined and in bold my emphasis)

 

I'm surprised it seems to be saying that local councils can't issue parking tickets but the police can for obstruction etc.  I'd have thought school zig zags were no parking 24/7.

 

Did @Another Rob get a police ticket?

 

(Nb - As they can't even spell "therefore" I suppose the rest of the site might be rubbish too... )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Manxman in exile no it wasn't a police ticket - it was a council one using cctv. It may well be that the site I quoted above is talking rubbish(!) but I've found a few that seem to say the same thing:

 

WWW.THESUN.CO.UK

WE all want to avoid the frustration and costly expense of a parking ticket - but the problem is, sometimes it’s hard to know what the rules are whe

 

WWW.MANCHESTEREVENINGNEWS.CO.UK

This is what the law says about parking near a school entrance and on yellow lines

 

WWW.ETA.CO.UK

What can be done to tackle parking outside schools that is inconsiderate and and downright dangerous?

 

but I have no idea if they are correct or not.

 

The point I'm trying to raise with the council is that the particular zigzag line that I stopped on was not 24 hours and had operating times (8am-4pm), however there is insufficient signage to advise drivers of the fact - there's a single sign further up a dead-end road that most people including me would not see until a PCN arrives with a photo of it on there. 

 

To be honest I can pay the fine, but I see it as another case of a local authority trying to trick drivers into supplementing their coffers. If this was really about protecting school children crossing then they would have signs further down the road (before the zigzag lines) to advise drivers not to stop.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...