Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car breakdown in France Bluechip Warranty


techie09
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

 

I was traveling to France with my family and unfortunatly the car broke down, with a bit of luck it was just as we got to the hotel and was covered by Green Flag breakdown.It was found that the water pump failed and was leaking coolent, so was towed to the nearest local garage.

The total repair bill was 773 Euros + 20% VAT total cost 927.60 Euros. My question is can i claim back the VAT as the car was returned to the UK the next day ?

 

The car was also still in its 6 month warranty period with Bluechip Warranty, but they are only offering to pay £243.00 of the cost of repair, saying their T&C only cover cheaper car parts and just 3 hours labour, when the labour was 4.8 hours.

 

Any advice on the above would be much appreciated as at the present i would be nearly £600 out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the car yours or on finance like hp?

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No warranty is ever worth the paper it is written on.

 

the item has failed within 6mts so under your consumer laws you could sue, but youd have to prove the fault was present at purchase, very diff for a water pump.

 

dont know about the vat sorry 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, they seem to try and get away with paying bare minimum by all those T&C's, probably will just bite the bullet and take the £243. On the VAT side i will take a look at this

https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/guide-vat-refund-visitors-eu_en

 

 but looks over complicated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

VAT 'tax free' schemes only apply to goods, not Services.

 

Unlike goods that can be physically exported, services are provided in the country concerned and once provided are done.

VAT paid should be part of any claim you can make to the Warranty company or breakdown insurer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got it, so even though i have paid VAT on the car parts (goods) used for the repair, once they are fitted into the car as part of the service they no longer count as being physically exported into the UK. The warranty company are paying for a small percentage of the bill only as their T&C :(

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, that's the principle. 

A supplier of goods does not have to charge VAT  if HE mails goods abroad (or to outside the EU, if he is in the EU).

VAT charged to you for services (not necessarily car servicing but 'doing something') is not reclaimable. 

 

Tax Free Personal Export Shopping schemes (now defunct in UK) can apply for goods personally exported by non-residents (or non-EU residents if purchased in EU) but this ceases to apply if the item is incorporated into something else - which it has been by being fitted to your car.

Also, the item would have to have been produced and verified by the EU customs at the point of departure from EU - which in this case has already happened.

 

Read the T&Cs closely. It might be that VAT is recoverable in full by the insurer (warranty company) as their Input Tax and therefore not part of the 'loss'  that has the limit. I believe that is how claims were often dealt with within UK by UK insurers.

Much as I would like it for you, I'm not hopeful. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...