Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Birmingham council Blue Badge fraud use - now magistrates date. **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The £1,000 is the maximum for the misuse of a Blue Badge, not necessarily what you would get fined.  Magistrates take into account your ability to pay when deciding the fine. 

 

Sorry to add to the things you need to worry about but as you are a teacher the court will report you to your school or local council if you are convicted and the school could start internal disciplinary proceedings against you.  Check the school's internal staff handbook or similar for when you must disclose any prosecutions against you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the council told you misuse of a Blue Badge is fraud so I'm afraid the council could well decide to prosecute you in a Magistrates court and that would give you a criminal record if convicted.

 

Right now though there's nothing you can do until you hear from council or the police. When you do, come back and update us and we''ll do what we can to advise you (but we are not lawyers and cannot replace advice from a solicitor).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Birmingham council Blue Badge fraud use - now magistrates date.Display Fraud

I'm not an expert on this so let's see what others say.

 

If you agree with the BB Inspector's statement, and from what you have posted on here, I think that a Guilty plea is the only thing you can do. 

 

You aren't being asked to make any statement at this time, just say how you intend to plead, Guilty or Not Guilty. The reason they ask you that now is to help them with scheduling when the hearing will take place. Usually if you plead Guilty it will all be dealt with on the day stated in the Summons, but if you plead Not Guilty the hearing will be rearranged to a later date. You don't enter your formal Guilty/Not Guilty plea until the hearing itself, the request on the Summons is to help with court administration. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a lawyer and I recommend that you see a lawyer for advice on this before saying how you intend to plead. They will be able to tell you if have any grounds for pleading Not Guilty.

 

As things stand if you plead Guilty or are found Guilty by the Magistrates yes you would have a criminal conviction and a criminal record for fraud under the Fraud Act 2006. I believe you said you are a teacher so the conviction would probably be notified to your employer, which could have serious employment consequences for you. Your school could dismiss you and you could end up being barred from teaching. 

 

I put it that bluntly because when the consequences could be that serious for you then you need professional legal advice from a solicitor specialising in criminal law. People who post on here are not legally qualified to give you that advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luckz666 said:

Thank you for that, it is much appreciated! I’m going to lose my job and career unfortunately as a result of this. I’m absolutely gutted…. Been in the education profession since I’ve been 21 and I’m 37 now 😢

 

It's not automatic so please don't assume that wil definitely happen. I'm a school governor and I have been on school disciplinary panels several times over the years dealing with staff who have received a criminal conviction for an offence of dishonesty. Only on one occasion was the staff member dismissed. Every case is dealt with on its individual circumstances.

 

Get advice from your union so that they can advise you on disclosure and represent you at any school internal disciplinary proceedings.

  • Like 2
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Luckz666 are you in a union? Most teachers are.

 

You need to talk to your union about this. Call the union regional office asap.

 

They will know what your contract requires you to disclose.  And they can advise you how the school is likely to react.  And how they will support you if the school.takes action under its internal staff disciplinary policy.

 

Your union can do all those things better than we can on here.

 

But please don't assume you will automatically lose your job. It is possible you will, there is no hiding from that. But it is not inevitable.

 

It will be better for you if you tell your headteacher as soon as possible. If you tell them nothing and they find out from the court the headteacher is more likely to dismiss you.

 

Earlier you said you are an "assistant teacher". Are you a qualified teacher? Or are you working as a TA (Teaching Assistant)?

 

Even if you get a Conditional Discharge it is still a conviction, so you will have a criminal record and it will appear on your DBS. There's no getting around that.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Well your union will know the way your particular school/academy trust has dealt with cases like this in the past better than we do but nevertheless dismissal cannot be automatic. The school will have to follow its staff disciplinary policy, so there must be a formal hearing at which you will be able to put forward mitigating circumstances and explain why you think you should not be dismissed. 

 

There's a vital role for your union at the hearing. A union representative, preferably from the regional office, should accompany you and put your case to the school. They should know what is most likely to persuade the school not to dismiss you. But as I said earlier in the thread dismissal may well be the outcome but is not inevitable. A primary headteacher friend of mine read this thread and commented that being a TA may make it marginally more likely that you keep your job than if you were a qualified teacher (because there are codes of professional conduct - the Teacher Standards - that apply to teachers but not TAs)

 

Even if you are not dismissed I'm afraid your plans to do a PGCE and qualify as a teacher almost certainly won't be possible. PGCE training institutions usually won't take on a student with a fraud conviction.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afarid it will. A fraud conviction will have to be disclosed and will affect whether motor insurers are willing to insure you and on what basis. And, before you ask, I don't know exactly what that will mean in practice.

 

Sorry, I feel like I'm being a constant bearer of bad news to you today, it will also have to be disclosed to your home insurer and is likely to affect that as well.

 

You might need to see a specialist insurance broker.

 

But let's see what what the court decides first. The sentence will indicate how serious a fraud they think it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If no duty solicitor can be found tell the Usher when they come to collect you for the hearing that you've asked to see the duty solicitor for advice  but the solicitor still hasn't seen you.

 

Re-read Post #35 by Man in the middle explaining why you are entitled to see the DS and be prepared to explain that to the Usher and the court.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@Blackcat13 here's where to start your reseach, the government Legal Aid page on gov.uk

 

WWW.GOV.UK

Legal aid helps pay for legal advice, mediation or representation in court - see if you can claim

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor has confirmed the advice given here earlier re criminal record, job, car insurance and that you have been charged with fraud, so no surprises there. What does the solicitor recommend you do now? 

 

Do you qualify for legal aid? The solicitor should be able to tell you if you do.

 

Will the solicitor represent you and speak for you in court when the hearing is resumed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been round this discussion several times @Blackcat13

 

No he does not have to dismiss you. There's no law that says you cannot work in a school if you have a conviction for fraud. But he is entitled to dismiss you if he chooses to..

 

As various people have said it is, sadly for you, likely that you will be dismissed. But it is not inevitable. Ultimately the governors (if you work in a Local Authority school) or the Academy Trustees (if you work in an academy) will decide.

 

Which is why I have been consistently advising you that it's important to get advice from your union  and to have them accompany you and speak for you at the disciplinary hearing that will inevitably have to take place. They are experienced in putting forward special reasons why you should not be dismissed. I wouldn't expect the disciplinary hearing to take place until after magistrates have decided your case.

 

It is possible he could suspend you until the disciplinary hearing is arranged. The head has the power to do that. In my opinion that would be unreasonable in your situation and if it happens get union help immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under your Staff Disciplinary Policy you probably are not entitled to have your union rep with you because it's not a formal disciplinary meeting.  But if I were in your position I'd ask my union rep to come with me on the grounds that I know it inevitably will lead to a formal discioplnary process later so I'd like my rep there from the start.

 

Head could refuse though. Make sure head knows in advance if union rep is accompanying you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

BC13 re cancelling insurance policy at renewal. You do NOT have to explain to any insurer why you are not renewing the policy. They cannot insist on a reason why you are not renewing so do not offer them one. 

 

But some will try to renew automatically unless you tell them not to so when renewal time comes make sure you contact them and say you do not want to renew.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...