Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's your intent, or interest? I can't see that you have any cause of action regarding bills issued by one third party to another third party. Is the idea to use this as a lever "I'll denounce you to HMRC unless you do blah blah .." That might in fact have no teeth anyway, HMRC will aware of the company's turnover via their other tax affairs.  As a matter of fact a company buying VAT rated supplies and selling to VAT registered customers is actually worse off if not VAT registered themselves. Has your court case reached it's conclusion yet?
    • Hello, welcome to CAG.  I expect people will be along to advise later. We aren't here to mock, this is a serious forum. If you feel you're being picked on  report the relevant post to the site team.  Best, HB
    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CEL /DCBL ANPR PCN CCJ as i moved!! - Butterfly Walk Car Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RW - anything i can do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks, so the below alone would be fine for now?

 

Dear DCB Legal,

 

Thank you for the rather laughable Letter Before Claim I have received from you, regarding the above speculative invoice sent out without consideration to the current codes of practice laid out by UK Law and your client’s own governing bodies.

 

There is absolutely no intention of contributing to what must almost certainly be your healthy income by paying the sum mentioned to your client, Civil Enforcement Limited. It’s fairly ridiculous that you believe people will fall for your nonsense and pay you their hard earned cash.

 

I can assure you I will certainly not be doing so, as I am fully aware your claim has no basis in law. You now have two options, the first of which is to drop this hopeless case, or continue to go to court where I will embarrass you and go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g).

Link to post
Share on other sites

A snotty letter has to tread a fine line between showing you have something and would be big trouble for them in court, and playing your cards too early.

 

Your second version is much better.  if you want, after "I am fully aware your claim has no basis in law" stick in "Go and look up "de minimis" thickos".  This hints that you know their case is carp but doesn't let on why.

 

Write at the bottom COPIED TO CIVIL ENFORCEMENT LTD.  It's important that you send a copy to CEL too as DCBL would love their clients to start a hopeless court case, after all it's £££££ in for them.  Let CEL too know that you are bad news who would make a large hole in their wallet in court.

 

If none of the other regulars have comments, in about a fortnight's time invest in two 2nd class stamps and get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all, I’ve heard back from Civil Enforcement Ltd following sending my ‘snotty letter’ detailed above.

 

Please see attached their letter. Nothing from DCBL yet.

 

any guidance on what to do next (if anything) please?

 

thanks 

IMG_7185.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

But, but, but if you didn't pay they were definitely going to take you to court.

 

Instead they are ... forcing you to open an envelope.

 

Yours is not the next move.  Ignore the letter. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all, thanks for reopening this thread.

 

After sending snotty letters to both DCB legal and CEL, and receiving acknowledgements from both (saying the debt was still owed), I didn’t hear anything further until now.

 

A slight spanner in the works is that I moved house at the end of September last year (however had a redirection in place with Royal Mail until 21 December 2022). My old flatmate picked up some post today and inside it was a letter entitled ‘county court judgment’ from DCB legal.
 

The letter states that a CCJ has been entered against me on 12/12/22. It’s important to note here that I have not received any notice of this, the latest I’d heard is the responses to my snotty letter, until this letter I opened today. Given I moved house, it’s possible a letter got lost in the redirection.

 

The letter I received today (which was actually sent on 28/12/22)  is attached here. The 30 days I had to pay the money has expired (yesterday, ironically), so I’m now not sure how to proceed. Worth noting here that I think the original PCN is invalid as I wasn’t sent the notice within 14 days, so I assume if this got to court they wouldn’t win anyway..

 

Is this an official CCJ? It doesn’t note any court details so I’m not sure, and not sure how to proceed from here. Thanks in advance!

7C0524BE-74AD-472E-B403-C235420E5E49.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CEL /DCBL ANPR PCN CCJ as i moved!! - Butterfly Walk Car Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RW - anything i can do?

i would expect there is a judgement

go check your credit file.

 

sadly as with most court documents they clearly state on the envelope do not redirect. so they never are.

 

not a lot you can do sadly, its far cheaper to ring them up and pay the sum.

the judgement was issued 12/12  if you ask the claimant nicely they might remove the ccj themselves, though its worthy to note courts are closed for ONE DAY over the xmas/newyear period, so you could get away with this.

 

set aside costs £275 with no guarantee of success.

 

i hope you told anyone else that is on your credit file or that owns a debt you last paid or used in say 7yrs of your new address? and ofcourse dvla re your car v5c and your driving licence (they are separate entities) 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply @dx100uk

 

Have definitely let DVLA know about license but not sure about v5c so will need to check that :classic_sad:

 

In terms of contacting the claimant to remove the CCJ - not entirely sure what you mean by that? As in because the courts were closed I could still argue it’s within 30 days? or my argument would be I never received the CCJ? 
 

Regards paying it, do I have to do that all through DCB Legal, given I haven’t got any details of the court etc?

 

Very frustrating given the PCN they issued in the first place was not valid!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact it was faulty is now out the window. the judgement trumps that.

 

you've suffered the classic scenario these firms dream for, you moved and did not inform them in writing you had.

they wrote

you did not reply.

they quite legally served a claim against you old address 

they got a default judgement through the backdoor via the robocourt where no human see or checks anything.

 

had you replied they most probably would not have issued the claim.

 

i'll say again. the courts were closed for one day, that gives you one cal month to settle the judgement + poss 1 day extra.

 

any payment has to be made to the claimant , the court might except it was paid in time, or they could reject it. the claimant could be nice and decide to remove it themselves if the court does not.

you are in somewhat grey territory im afraid.

 

arguing you didnt receive anything is only ever good if you are going to set aside.

but as that reason is of your own doing ....me thinks the judge will not swallow it.. wasted £275 and you'd still have to pay the ccj.

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx has summed everything up.

 

This is a crying shame as your case was eminently winnable.  Surely you saw on other threads that when someone moves they must inform anyone they are in legal dispute with of the new address in writing.

 

Whatever you do will be unpalatable.

 

1.  Pay it.  As in this evening.  The bad side is £290 down the drain, the good side is that your credit file is saved ...

 

... possibly.  You may have missed the deadline and end up paying and still having a knackered credit file for six years.  As dx says, you are so near the deadline it's a grey area.

 

2.  Apply for set aside.  The bad side is that i costs £275 that you would never see again.  Good side?  Who knows.  The judge might allow set aide and "turn the clock back" till September.  Or the set aside might be rejected and you'd be stuck with the knackered credit file for six years plus goodbye to £275.

 

3.  Defy the court and not pay.  Good side - no money spent.  Bad side - being punished for six years by having a knackered credit file.

 

Your unpalatable choice. 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...