Companies without postal address

[BazzaS]

Apparently the claim is too complicated to explain to the simple minded members of CAG (who reply, free of charge, giving up their spare time voluntarily!).

 

Good luck explaining it in a small claims track claim, then!

 

So, this leaves the OP with the fast-track or multi-track : if they then want to spend their time arguing with CAG advice they’d be better off paying for formal legal advice.

 

Perhaps they’d be a bit more cooperative if they were paying for the privilege of asking for advice but denying the advisers relevant details …….

 

It is a self-help site, but some posters don’t seem to want to help CAG’ers help them.

[BazzaS]

Agree with @UB.

 

Since the likely track any claim would be allocated to (and the costs therein) relates not only to the value of the claim but also its complexity, this IS relevant information, even if @today seeks to disregard it being relevant.

 

Wether this then falls on deaf ears (because it doesn’t meet @today’s apparent requirements!) is another matter.

Edited January 13, 2022 by BazzaS

[BazzaS]

if @today wants to disregard the advice that the details matter, and just wants a simplistic answer : they’ve been given it already.

 

(It matters not then that it is potentially wrong, given the detail being ignored might make it poor advice, as that is @today’s choice!)

 

Answer : tracing company.

Good luck, and don’t come back bleating if you waste your time and money : you had fair warning.

[BazzaS]

Great! You can pay and then post the results to help all those others, then.

 

(Unless you are saying you don’t want to go to the trouble and cost, but are happy for others to do so for YOUR benefit).

[BazzaS]

So,’ because you didn’t know what people might find, you somehow don’t know what you knew’. What tosh!.

 

You could have said what you knew, but you chose not to. Simples.

[BazzaS]

@today : what a charmer!

[BazzaS]

I now provide shorter answers than the OP.