NCP/BW PCN PAPLOC now claimform - New Gatwick Drop Off Zone - I thought I had paid for both visits? ***Claim Dismissed***

[dx100uk]

2 hours ago, MoaningCrusader said:

I have yet to receive any other advice to my sticky that filled out?

there is absolutely no rush or real need for you to do anything. the process has a long way to go , bar the threat of more fake monetary sums being added for unicorn food tax and fake DCA fees, that scare people...on it's going up.

 

also your point about byelaws is extremely relevant , no PPC can enforce byelaws , only the airport authority can and they cant pass that authority on. it is not ever wise to do anything yet where byelaws are involved. 

 

pers i'd sit on your hands, doing nothing at this stage can never harm you and as with all speculative invoices, until or unless you ever get a letter of claim, there is most def no need too.

 

there is soo much drivel on this thread im not wasting my time looking, but have you checked your online banks A/C to see if the payments were processed, not that it really matters.

[dx100uk]

just type no need to keep hitting quote.

[dx100uk]

NCP HAVE to abide by the pre action protocol and sent a letter of claim 1st, they normally do (IF IF IF) , they don't normally jump straight to getting northants bulk court to issue a court claim, which comes in a large a4 windowed brown envelope directly from the court.

 

6 minutes ago, MoaningCrusader said:

Or is it advisable for me to write a letter from the registered keeper informing them I will not be paying and give the grounds on which why I will not be paying and then ignore all subsequent correspondence from them?

you do this ONLY if you get a letter of claim, and you find/use one of our snotty letters already on many threads, BUT you post it here 1st for checking!!

 

dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

The very best idea is to look here yourself then you are not influenced by anyone.

 

type ncp in our search top right

[dx100uk]

BW are solicitors not a DCA .

 

You send them a snotty letter.

 

Use our search top right type in ....

BW+snotty+letter

[dx100uk]

Well yes you have read the thread to see the letter in one of its posts. 

 

We know what the loc looks like so don't need anything bar page 1. If at all 

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

Doesn't really mean anything, but you must reply by day 30.

 

Pop your ideas up here 1st 

 

 

[dx100uk]

Well don't play your cards upon how you might defend if it ever did get in court.

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

where are you admitting you were the driver in your snotty letter?

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

yes posts were merged and so were unnecessary quotes of previous posts whereby you also state whom you are replying too, just type, we know what we've said.

 

you are not defending anything at this stage, there is no court claim to defend, and anyway, even if you did defend it later , you most certainly will never be advised to file anything that even remotely points to you being the driver 

[dx100uk]

Just send cpr no need for any adaptation.

Not sure where you get this unreasonable costs stuff from?

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

Not really, they must disclose everything in their ws.

Would have been nice but if you weren't capable of clicking sar, adding 2 addresses, then so bit it.

 

Your defence is the generic bland one further down in the above sticky you already  filled out.

 

DX

[dx100uk]

ive sorted that expand issue no need for it to be there at all.

i would not use bank statements ever

CTAX bill

or Util Bill

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

Use ctax ...doesn't hurt OH is on though you can block her out.

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

dont get confused with this 28 days....

 

it not a hard stop date, and with the delays in courts, we've seen N180's filed months after any 'deadline'

 

its an autostay , its not reported on mcol either when a claim IS autostayed.

 

the letter you have is a std one , its in 100's of BW claimform threads here already.

 

i know we keep saying it but you must make it a habit to read pcn claimform threads in down times, not await the next wheel poking .

by keeping up poss everyday reading threads you will eventually understand the whole process, how it works, whats to come, how to respond and whats next after that, and all the little tricks the fleecers pull along the way.

 

 

[dx100uk]

You respond as any other pcn claimform thread to the DQ n180.

 

Is the DQ showing as being send out on mcol status?

 

And I'm not sure where you think a magistrate or criminal court is anything to do with a civil court claim?

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

 

 

 

3 copies

yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket)

1 wit you

Suitability for determination without a hearing? no

the rest is obv

1 to the court

1 to sols (omit phone/sig/email)

1 for your file

 

dx

[dx100uk]

you have nothing to mediate over, you dont want to pay a reduced sum, the claim is speculative.

 

as for witnesses, pers i would involve nor is there a need to involve, other people, 

[dx100uk]

Should read would not 

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

Urm..

is there really worth here in using 2 statements backing up the 'look i paid' claim, at the expense of a paperwork only hearing? I doubt it pers.

 

It screams of im lying and i need backup.

its not really a very important point anyway.

 

Dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

The n180 info is generic to all claimform threads, of which as andyorch points out, are mostly credit claims, which are better not signed on their copy 

 

Might create an additional one for PPC claims.

 

As for routinely signing things back to the fleecers or their dogs , like a snotty letter, you should simply PC type your name. IMHO. They are not court related.

 

Dx

[dx100uk]

they always make that mistake, they think it means OTHER witnesses not their rep.

 

dx

 

[dx100uk]

std rubbish they send to intimidate and harass

doesnt mean they will move fwd to direction questionnaire stage. 

[dx100uk]

It will be encrypted. It must be by law .think about it.  ..

 

You should get a sep letter or email with details upon how to access it soon .

 

Dx

 

 

[dx100uk]

The Driver breached their imaginary contract (which must be detailed on a sep sign, along with it's full  T&C's) when they drove the car onto private property whereby the landowner has signed a contract with them to manage it's parking.