Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Statute Barred Debts & Capquest - Help/Advice Required


Teer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 936 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I had some credit card debts a number of years ago & I was hounded no end from a number of different debt collection agencies from then on as well as their legal & solicitor letters.

 

I sought advice from here & other places at the time & as instructed did not respond, contact or acknowledge any of them or nor gave them any information. Over the years, a regular stream of letters & contacts from various DCA's became the norm.

 

Much time has now passed & the debts must have become Statue Barred about 2 - 3 years ago & for the last few years I heard nothing from any of the DCA's.

 

However, a few months ago, I began to get emails & telephone messages from Capquest asking me to call to discuss "My Account"  or via emails stating that:  "You have a new document available on your Capquest account 01052xxxxxPlease click the below link to login to view your document - Click Here."

 

The email account on which they contact me is not one that I ever shared with any financial institution but was tied to my ebay account so I can only assume they must have been doing searches for me as my previous email address proved unsuccessful for them. I also had a change of telephone number but somehow they must have found my new number - both of which I find disturbing.

 

I am surprised that they would contact me 2 - 3 years after the Statute Barred Period of 6 years - none of the very many other DCA's have - only CapQuest?

 

In view of these recent regular email & telephone message contacts to me by Capquest (none of which to I have ever responded to), I would like to ask if they might have genuine grounds to now chase me after all this time & what they might be up to?

 

How should I proceed from here & what actions should I take to ensure they can make no claims against me nor affect my credit rating etc? I do not want to inadvertently fall into any traps they might set up or tactics they might employ to then reinstate the debt etc.

 

Thank You

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no law to say they cant chase. After all its not your fault they brought a dud. 

 

I would wait until you get something in the post from them. That way you can respond in writing. 

 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the CONC rules if you put them on notice that the debts that they are chasing our statute barred and that they should desist from any further enforcement process, then they are not allowed to pursue you any further.

Send them a letter, telling them that alleged debts are statute barred. Refer them to CONC and tell them that if you hear anything more from them on this matter that you will make a complaint to the financial ombudsman service and that when you get the decision not only will you get sum in compensation but also you will then forward information relating to their behaviour and also the financial ombudsman's decision to the FCA.

 

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tho we all know that just because a company Should do something does not mean they should. 

Past experience has taught me this. 

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st things 1st

once debt has gone from your file it cant comeback. You cant unbar a debt, not even a judge can do that.

 

you should never ignore old debts, any dca/debt buyer could quite legally file a court claim against your old address, even if the debt is sb'd. As no human checks or sees anything.

 

you need to send all your debt owners our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of our library.

 

never run from debt!! Protect yourself against backdoor ccj's

  • I agree 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...