Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road after coming off the motor way, i noticed my car felt a little "weird" i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intolerant on date night, we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i haven't received anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. Should i query the ticket as i don't want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep quiet. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the beginning of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, however he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt received any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her mail until last week. She received a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehicle and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she responds by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hermes - my parcel was eaten by rats - **SETTLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

*advice sought on next steps please!*

 

In March, the parcel I sent via Hermes was initially "lost" for two weeks, and then delivered. The box and contents had been eaten by rats and was covered in rat urine. The recipients then had to dispose of the hazardous remnants of the parcel.

 

The recipients were family, and we are all absolutely disgusted by Hermes' failings. I have since been trying to claim compensation for the contents, postage, and negligence by Hermes. I can't even get a postage refund.

 

Hermes cannot even bring themselves to apologise, or acknowledge any wrong doing via their claims processes.

 

The list of Hermes's wrong doings are as follows:

 

1. Hermes cannot say where my "lost" parcel was for a 12 day period

2.My parcel took 14 days to be delivered. (the website said it should have taken up to 7 days to the location I required, but this information seems to have since been taken down)

3. All of the goods within the parcel were damaged by rats

4. The delivery man did not log a picture of the damaged goods as proof of delivery (only a blank sheet of paper is uploaded, supposedly not to incriminate themselves regrading the condition of the parcel)

5. The delivery man did not ring the doorbell, or speak to the recipient, and physically ran away from the property once the parcel was dumped and actively avoided communication with the recipients

6. Hermes would not honour my claim for compensation because the parcel contained (in their opinion) "perishable food". But they cannot offer a definition of "perishable" and do not accept the fact that if the parcel did not encounter rats, then the parcel items would have lasted weeks or even months within the box.

7. Hermes have refused to discuss my case any further and have ceased communications.

 

What I have done:

 

1.Tried to claim via Hermes and failed.

2. Contacted Citizens Advice (who contacted Trading Standards)

3.Completed a chargeback claim via my bank (for the postage) which was declined. I complained at the decision, and it was rejected again.

 

Evidence I have:

 

1. Photos of the parcel before and after delivery

2.All correspondance with Hermes

3.Correspondance with Citizens Advice and my bank

 

Aside from the health aspects of recieving a parcel covered in rat urine, I feel compelled enough to take this further on principle. It is not reasonable to pay for a courier service that destroys parcels, and they should not be immune to providing compensation for the above.

 

Any advice on this particular situation is welcome, in particular, what are my next steps?

 

I am sure I have protection under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

 

Thanks very much!

 

hedge_err

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't told us what was in the parcel, what the value was.

Also, where the contents properly declared and was the value properly declared. Did you pay any of their so-called compensation insurance? (Not that it is particularly relevant).

Please could you post up the message which you have received from Hermes declining any responsibility

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for your reply. The parcel was a mix of (mostly food-related) things I bought and made-up myself to send to family. The complete list is: tinned food items (15 tins); dried pasta items; coffee; packaged fruit cakes; dried apricots; dried seeds and one over-the-counter medical item. The value is £43.50.

 

I declared the contents as "Dry food" when purchasing the postage on the Hermes website. I also submitted a "proof of value" note to Hermes with itemised contents and values as part of my claim.

 

I had free cover up to £20. The postage cost £12.04.

 

Please find the final correspondance message I recieved from Hermes attached. Final_Hermes_Response.pdf

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I think if it wasn't for the fact that this is very low value, Hermes might consider giving you a run for your money on this one.

However, they seem to be declining liability because of the tinned foods – and not for anything else.

If you want to pursue this then of course we will help you. Start reading around the Hermes threads on the sub- forum and also read up on this forum about the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court.

Draft a letter of claim and then post it here and will have a look and take you through the next step.

However, if you read through a dozen or so of the Hermes stories, you will understand all the steps and nothing will feel particularly new to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to persue this further and I really appreciate the support of this forum.

 

I've done some reading and now attempted draft 1 of the letter of claim.

 

I've attached it as a PDF here:Letter Before Claim v1.pdf

 

Any feedback would be gratefully recieved.

 

I've looked at the Money Claims .gov page and I note they have a new online system. I trust this doesn't change anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit to wordy

you dont sent evidence either with an LOC either

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

poc is when you launch a court claim.

but no you dont...

submitting evidence only happens once/when/if the claim ever gets to the witness statement stage before it goes to a hearing with the judge

 

get reading up

 

100's of hermes threads here use our enhanced google search bar.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for the update.

Very unusual to get a result before you have to issue the claim. Well done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Hermes - my parcel was eaten by rats - **SETTLED**

well done everyone.

 

please don't forget to donate if you can to keep us here

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...