Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that is the first final notice you have received you can probably expect two or thee more to follow. This to test your resolve. They are hoping that these frightening 😃 letters will scare you into paying. After the third or fourth final demand they then have to decide  whether to actually proceed with a court claim or forget about you for a while. You were not the driver, their PCN is non compliant .No biggy.Slam dunk win for you.
    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop - *** Successful Claim ****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 690 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please could you post up any documents in PDF format. I'm afraid that JPEG are difficult to deal with and causes problems for people especially those with small screens.
PDFs please. Single file multipage.

You say that you have already been reading around this forum and so you understand the stories and the steps involved in making a claim against Hermes. You also understand that you will inevitably end up having to go to court.

Please could you set out what has happened in a brief chronological timeline. Try and skip the narrative.

If you done a letter of claim then can you please put it up in type format – not a JPEG – or in PDF format.

I understand that you are claiming for a laptop computer which was sold for £1500.

Was this all properly declared?

Did you take out insurance?

Have you made your formal complaint against Hermes or P2G and have they declined your claim – and on what grounds.

As you originally contracted with P2G and because they are based in the UK – unlike Packlink who are based in Spain, you have the option of suing either one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BankFodder said:



Please could you set out what has happened in a brief chronological timeline. Try and skip the narrative.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, alanwicker555 said:

 

 

 

Letter of Claim - Tracking number: xxxxxxxxx

 

Dear Sir, Madam, 

 

On 26/02/2021 I used your service to send a parcel under the above reference number.

 

The parcel did not arrive at the destination and after several exchanges with your customer service staff, I was told that the item was lost. I was also told that I would not be entitled to make any compensation claim because I had not purchased an additional compensation cover.

 

I am preparing to take you to court. If you force this to a court hearing – you can be certain that I shall be producing evidence from many different sources to show that you and your subcontractor Hermes, systematically lose parcels and decline liability on spurious grounds which are unfair and unenforceable.

 

The contents of my parcel were valued at £1,625.00  plus the delivery fee of £11.88.

 

If I do not have reimbursement in full within 14 days then I shall issue a claim in the County Court to recover this money from you plus interest and without any further notice.

 

 

Yours sincerely, 
xxx

 

 

This is all you need in your particulars of claim.

Send it off now – and then register with moneyclaim online and start preparing your claim.

Post your proposed particulars of claim here for us to see before you click it off.

You clearly do understand the arguments in respect of their so-called insurance requirement.

As long as the contents of the parcel were properly declared and as long as the value was properly declared – then our view is that you are satisfied all the requirements.

As you know, it is really for the courier company to protect themselves against negligence or criminality of their own employees. Not for you.

Please make sure that you read all the steps involved in taking a small claim to the County Court so that you are confident about what you're doing. It's straightforward but it is worth making sure that you are in control.

Very likely your claim go to mediation – look at the mediation stories here. There are several excellent summaries of people's mediation experience which will be helpful to you.

Let me do point out, that based on the value of what you are claiming here, there is a possibility that they may decide to stick their heels on the mediation and to force it to a court hearing. After that, it is extremely likely that they will put their hands up just before the court hearing because in fact they will be testing your resolve.

However, if it does go to a court hearing then it would be if an opportunity for their insurance requirement to be tested against the unfair terms provisions in the consumer rights act 2015. That would be very interesting to us and of course we would expect a judge to declare that the insurance requirement is unfair.

That would be very serious blow for the courier industry.

Please keep us updated. You may well get some kind of response from P2G but stick to your timeline. You would have given them 14 days – wait until day 15 and then click off the claim.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I made an amendment in red – and if that all fits in then I think the invitation to the court to examine the entire contract for fairness and unenforceability may up the ante a little. It would certainly be quite exciting if it actually got to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I'm not going back through the thread at the moment – but as long as the laptop was correctly declared and the values correctly declared – then you know what we have to say about insurance requirements et cetera.

As soon as your letter of claim deadline expires then click off the claim.

One thing that occurs to me – and you might like to find out – is that having declared that it was a laptop of that particular value, would it then allow you to go on to get insurance?

That would be quite amusing to find that it was apparently on their prohibited items list – and yet they would still sell you insurance. If you found that out, we could store it away and use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Okay. Same old story.

I've written lots of commentaries on the arguments to use in respect of the various defences. Please make sure you understand what we are saying in terms of the fairness of unfairness of the requirement that it is you who insures against the negligence of the company or the criminality of their employees. It is the company which should be taking out insurance not their own customers.

Imagine going into a restaurant and you get food poisoning and then the restaurant says that they don't have third party insurance. It is the customers job.

Make sure you are thoroughly familiar with all the various principles and also the mediation journey. Lots of good summaries here about the mediation experience.

Let us know when you get the DQ. And small claims track. Agree to mediation – because they probably will have indicated that they want it.

Keep us updated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

No I don't think that's helpful. You aren't suing Hermes and the action is in contract anyway.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Please can you post up the witness statement or skeleton arguement that you have filed

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop

Thanks very much indeed for updating us and also thank you very much for this very helpful message.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Parcel Hero + EVRi = Lost laptop - *** Successful Claim ****
  • 2 weeks later...

The transcript has been ordered and it should be available in the next couple of weeks or so.

 

 

Once we have it then you can be certain that we will give you access to it .

 

Have you located the other judgement which we have supplied .

I think it is posted up on that thread somewhere.

 

You should start planning your court bundle and also your witness statement/skeleton arguement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...