Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marriage Separation - I've bought him out ***Resolved***


Fringer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband and I have recently separated

During our 16yr marriage, his parents unfortunately passed away and after his mum died, I was given the option to choose a piece of her Swarovski crystal which I have had in my possession for the last 4 years

Now the marriage has broken down and I have bought my husband out of of home and paid him a sum of money for the contents

He is now telling me I am not able to keep this item or crystal as it was his mothers. We have a shed full of all of her other collection which we inherited which I have said he can have it all - I would just like the one piece I chose

Is he right? The item is still in my house of which he still has a key until the weekend when he removes his clothes etc

Am I within my right to remove it from my house before he gets there tomorrow to collect his things as I know he will take it 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this gift mentioned in MiL's will.. for example, did it say that you would be able to choose an item?  If this was the case, then I believe you would be entitled to keep this.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with citizenB.

 

Sometimes the Will states a specific piece of jewellery/valuables is bequeathed to someone. Then the Executors must give it to you. And then it's yours, end of. 

 

Sometimes a Will might say it's up to the executors  who gets the jewellery. But once that decision has been made  and the Swarokski piece has been given to you then it is yours. They can't change their minds later and take it back.

 

So yes, take it out of your house immediately and keep it safe with you asap.

 

The legal theory is all very well in cases like this, but who has possession of the piece is much more important in practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When she died us 3 wives of her sons were offered to choose a piece from her vast collection. 

I chose this piece.

When I told my husband I wanted out, I asked if I could keep the piece and he said no. 
He still has a key to my house and I did say he could come whilst I am out to collect his things but I may just rethink that! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean that under the Will the Swarovski collection passed to the 3 sons and they allowed their wives to choose a piece each?

 

Apart from it sounding remarkably patronising of them I'd say that the sons became the owners of the Swaovski collection but your husband gave you one of the items as a gift. It's no different to any other gift he gave you, it became yours when he gave it to you. So unless he gave it to you conditionally ("this gift is conditional on us contiuing to be married and living together") he is not entitled to it back. That's just my opinion though, I'm not a lawyer or an expert.

 

Whether at this stage in your marriage it matters enough for you to have the argument only you can judge.

 

And although this isn't your question, in your position I'd see a solicitor specialisng in divorce and family law and get some advice generally about your situation. Separation doesn't necessarily lead to divorce but it's as well to get some preliminary advcie about your position now. Apologies if I'm saying something you are already doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Marriage Separation - I've bought him out ***Resolved***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...