Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's solved Laura.  It's in the paragraph I've highlighted here in the attachment from the IAS. Plus look at page 28 of the PDF of Bank's WS.  There is written - 157 IPS 29/04/2022 12:52 29/04/2022 14:52 YE60PZA 158 IPS 29/04/2022 12:51 29/04/2022 14:51 YE60PZA - there are the two payments. One is for the elderly woman's car. One is for your son's, but with the wrong registration. When I get a second this evening I'll add the exhibits to the WS and it will be finished. IAS adjudicator's report.pdf
    • Speeding "tickets" are not like parking tickets. They cannot be appealed.  No you won't get one of them cancelled. They were two days apart and so will be treated as separate offences. If your speed was 53mph or below you will be offered a course for one of them (cost of about £100 but no points). For the other you will be offered a fixed penalty (£100 and three points). If you want to decline either of those offers the alternative is prosecution in court, where the financial penalty will be considerably higher. Make sure you respond to the "requests for driver's details" within the 28 days allowed. Failure to do so will see you commit a more serious offence which carries a hefty fine, six points, and an endorsement code which will see your insurance premiums double. Also make sure you submit your driving licence details if you accept a fixed penalty.
    • So if I've understood correctly, you had a meeting with a company who employ PPM to manage their car park, but PPM gave you a ticket and the company refuse to get it cancelled.  Eh???!!! You are being somewhat secretive with the details and it would help us to give correct advice if you would be crystal clear about the story.  Who did you have the meeting with?  What is their address?  Why do you think it was them who called in PPM?  Were you informed about the matter of the permit by this company?  Etc.
    • What a disgraceful shirking of responsibility.  Par for the course though I'm afraid with Iceland. You could get nasty and send them a version of the below (you know the local area so change what needs to be changed). Unfortunately the people who are replying are having to comply with the company policy which is being foisted on them - which is not to cancel tickets. But you might as well send the mail and try.   Dear Cissy, thank you for today's mail. Of course you are "able" to cancel the charge, you simply contact Excel and tell them to cancel the charge. I will wait for exactly 24 hours and then contact the local newspaper XXXXX and the local radio station XXXXX about Iceland's disgraceful disability discrimination.  Nothing much happens in Gravesend so I'm sure both will be happy to do a piece which will generate terrible publicity for your store and drive away customers, which is exactly what you deserve. Yours, XXXXX 
    • You are absolutely right to be cautious. It would be helpful if you will be prepared to send me a private message containing details of the outlet and the address et cetera. It might help me to get things more into perspective. So I understand that you had a business selling your husband's photographs. You were unable to continue your direct involvement and so you made an arrangement with a manager who you trusted to carry on the business for you while you were recovering elsewhere in the country. Is this correct? This manager has possession of all the files of your husband's photographs. Is this correct? Do you have any copies of the files? You made a reference to having a Co-op. Does that mean that you are running a Co-op supermarket or groceries outlet? I don't quite understand here. In terms of the possibility of continuing the arrangement with this manager – my own view is that you need to bring the arrangement to an end and I don't see how you could trust them. As far as I can see you are asking about two issues. Making sure that the files in the manager's position are destroyed so that you regain control of the photographs. Obtaining some damages for the loss of revenue. How many photographs do you believe are in his possession? What you estimate is your loss of revenue so far – probably calculated on your average revenue over, say, the five years before you stopped your involvement in the business? You are talking here not only about a breach of contract. You are talking also about breach of copyright and frankly you're also talking about deliberate copyright infringement – which is a criminal offence. Also fraud. Additionally, if you begin the dispute with this person, I would say that they will probably leave immediately. Have you got somebody else to run the business or would that be the moment that the whole thing collapses? If it is the latter, then this is something else that you need to prepare – somebody to take over as seamlessly as possible   Also, do you know the address of this person – and do they own their own home or any other assets?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I also have got a faulty car from yew tree cars


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I also have got a car from yew tree cars and  I live in Devon and they delivered my car

but it wasn’t the car I picked

 

it’s a death trap and still in garage and will cost over £1200 to get it road worth .

no v5

no mot

no warranty

 

I paid over £5000 for it

 

I need help to get my money back

 

we need to stop them from doing it to others

 

I have all texted from the with all empty promises 

 

On the 25th nov 2020 I saw an advert online for discovery three

I went on their website and phoned the number after having a conversation with a gentleman and him sending me some photographs.

I paid a deposit after about 4045 text messages talking about the car and having more photographs , I was happy then to pay the remainder plus delivery charge.

after being let down on delivery on five occasions a car eventually came.

the car was the car on the outside as photographs but not the inside of the photographs
I had no V5 no warranty as promised . No sunroof as promised . No factory fitted floor mats as promised . No towbars as promise.

I’ve phoned him up to ask about C5 et cetera he says delivery was more until I paid it I wasn’t getting the V5 .

Lloyd driver left we looked over the car it had no MOT it was unroadworthy.
Got a garage to pick it up as couldn’t drive it it’s going to cost us £1200 to put it right which I haven’t got he has received my TEXT my emails .

we sent a recorded delivery letter to the address he gave which wasn’t correct.

Edited 41 minutes ago by BankFodder (see edit history)
Only staff can see this message

Link to post
Share on other sites

No air any suspension rear and front

windscreen wipers split

where we slept are split in the metal the back door

both front tyres

awful brake pads and brake discs

non-existent suspension fault no

 

no warranty

no V5

and wasn’t the car that was in the pictures or on the website

still was a discovery three but a different one

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should say right now that there is no evidence that this new dealer is the same person who appeared in the daily mail story.

There is no evidence to link them and although I've asked @Dude1 several times to explain why they think it's the same person, I haven't had any response.

I'm afraid that I would work on the assumption that there is no connection and that you are dealing with a new dealer

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, senbell1 said:

Citizens advice they passed it on to trading standards ... hes since been calling me free talking to get me to remove my post which i have refused he said he would pay for a new steering colum and pay half labour fees , I said if he does that I shall edit my post and say he came good and done the right thing ... I don't believe a single word nor should you if he calls you  . *** He is reading everything we post on here ***

Good Iam glad he’s reading this cause he will pay again if he comes good I will tell people but I think we can dream on 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. It's a terrible story and I'm very sorry.

How much did you actually pay for this vehicle please? Also, have you got any screenshots of the advertisement?

As you already seen on this forum, it's an extremely difficult situation because nobody really seems to know who this person is.

I was very interested to see that you originally posted that this was the same dealer who featured in the daily mail story last year.

Do you still think that? And what makes you think that?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid £5343 plus a extra £50 for a mot which I didn’t get

I paid money into yewtrees bank details and the name is the same and the address he gave is the same

 

I spoke to delivery company told me that they never had the car till the day before they brought it to me.

I have around 45-50 texts from him and all the empty promises  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

Which is the delivery company?

And as I said, earlier on you suggested that this dealer was the same as the one which appeared in the daily mail last year. Do you still think that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fine. But we need to know what makes you think that. It's very important if you want us to help you and the others

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dude1 said:

Urban vehicle logistics ltd

I'm afraid that you will need to explain this. We are doing our best to understand – but you will have to help us please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel it’s the same person as I was giving the same address the same empty promises and stories are so similar 

 

Urban vehicle logistics ltd was the company that delivered my car on yew tree behave 

 

I can send you all the texts bank transfer I have it all printed out trading standards and action fraud have a copy of them to the pics of all faults of the car to I can get garage report aswell 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...