VCS CCTV PCN - No Stopping - Outside entrance to southend airport SS2 6YF (Lay Rep too) ***Claim Dismissed***

[brassnecked]

You ignore letters from a DCA, they are not bailiffs are powerless and they won't send anyone to knock on the door A letter is full of if but and maybe  with no defini=te Will statement.

[brassnecked]

If you fill in their pack they think you are going to pay up.

 

You must rewspond to it and its best with a snotty letter.

 

[brassnecked]

He is clutching at straws with Airport cases, and has asked for Leave to Appeal in one case, so keep all evidence safe in case he is silly.

[brassnecked]

He has up to six years to bring a case

[brassnecked]

That letter is now standard VCS procedure, thereaten the extra £220 costs if you don't cave and agree to their "offer" to settle that cannot be granted in Small Claims Track, its an overt frightener, and will be useful in your Witness Statement, think they have beed pulled up on that one before.

[brassnecked]

No best ignore it and put the letter as exhibit in a Witness Statement, for the false costs.

[brassnecked]

If what Lookedinforinfo is correct, VCS are on a very sticky wicket so definitely  put in WS that you were stopped on land outside the control/jurisdiction of VCS.

[brassnecked]

So if you post up your revision so we can look, then we have something to work from when VCS send you their cut and paste masterpiece(NOT)  that Ambreen or Wali has concocted.

[brassnecked]

The Unicorn feed tax is an easy way to get at them, and as FTMDave says their WS is likely to be essentially same as every other airport no stopping WS they knock out.

[brassnecked]

Hmm a 2002 wheel clamping case  Vine v Waltham Forest LBC they are clutching at straws there

 

Point 24 is a word salad VCS v Idle/Ward

Whether there was a contract with  motorists who stopped their vehicles in whereby it was not prohibited"

 

The other's will be along later  but they are scraping bottom using wheel clamping cases to justify their position.

[brassnecked]

Yes VCS try to go behind the Bylaws and push them as an  irrelevance this now seems to be their standard MO in No Stopping cases.  In reality VCS can  present foprward all the cases in Contract they like but they can't trump By laws unless they can bamboozle the judge on the day.

[brassnecked]

WQe need to see the whol;e sorry misive from beginning to end, then it will be clear which points need extra emphasis in your WS, that non existent sign is one such point, as if they have submitted it as being on the site when it is somewhere else its a nice one to include.

[brassnecked]

"The two black and white signs in the images above, do not show them in situ, so I don't think they can rely on them anyway. otherwise they could just produce any old sign and claim it was in situ."

 

That is exactly what the solicitor they send might imply, that the sign as illustrated is at the location, the one provided is to show what's on it or some other bollox.

[brassnecked]

Best to prepare a crib sheet for hearing addressing what Simon's lot have put related to OP WS points to fire at opposition then.

[brassnecked]

Well done great result. Don't know where the judge got that idea as lack of Planning Permission is a criminal offence.