Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the scrappage scheme is nothing to do with the agreement ...sorry. it's an enticement to purchase a replacement vehicle. just the same as shop signs that say 50% off or whatever.  its a done and dusted deal done before you enter into the agreement for the remaining £sum. 
    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • This is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lending Stream Claim - Refund Offered...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon,

A few weeks ago i sent a complaint to Lending Stream regarding my view that they have acted irresponsibly when providing a number of consecutive loans to me over the past 18 months.  In total there are 9no loans dating back from March 2019 to July 2020.

 

My Complaint

My complaint is based on my belief that i should not have been given the loans in the first instance.  When entering my application i was asked to enter my outgoings as you would generally expect, however, i was not given the option to enter the actual amount of outgoings, just simply select from a drop down list.  

 

The problem i have with this is that the drop down list only went up in £50 increments up to £500, then the last option to select was >£500.  As my rent alone was £1200, i could obviously only enter >£500.  My issue is that i cannot see how Lending Stream could have assessed my affordability correctly when they do not have the correct info in the first instance.  Had they known the actual amount of my outgoings, then i'd like to think they would not have offered the loan.

 

As the loans were always paid on time (therefore no adverse marks on my credit file), it may seem that the loans were affordable.... however this was only affordable at the time as i kept topping up the loan or get a new payday loan to pay off another.

 

Recently i applied for yet another loan from Lending Stream (to consolidate my current loan with them and leave me with extra funds over the Xmas period) but noticed they have changed their application process to now include Consents Online Limited, which i understand links to the bank account and checks the actual income and outgoing to determine affordability.  My recent application (using Consents Online process) was declined.  I can only assume that had this process been in place for my first loan, then i would not have been approved and wouldn't be in the mess i'm in right now!

 

Lending Stream Response

Just before Xmas i received a letter attached to an email confirming they have looked into my complaint and confirmed they believe loans 1-6 were affordable and so do not agree to my complaint.  They have also confirmed they believe loans 7-9 to also have been affordable based upon the information provided BUT they do agree that they should have considered the number of loans being taken and the short space of time between loans and so they partially agree to my complaint.

 

Lending Stream have offered to refund the interest paid on loans 7-9, including 8% simple interest and remove any adverse marks on the credit file for these loans.  The total refund comes to £891.03.  They have provided a weblink to enter my account details so the refund can be sent to me.

 

My Query

I believe I have a case to go to the Ombudsman with and would like to think i could also achieve a refund of the interest from loans 1-7 as when considering my finances at the time, these were even less affordable than loans 7-9 of which Lending Stream agree to my complaint. However, i could really do with the money at the moment, so i am tempted to click on the link they provided and enter my banking details.  

 

My couple of queries are,

do you think i have a case to go to the Ombudsman with?  

And also, would i be able to enter my details and take the refund now, then pursue the rest through the ombudsman?

 Or by taking this refund would that close the complaint?

 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

 

Matt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless their reply or the webpage you insert your payment details into, states that the refund is in full and final settlement of ALL loans, then you are safe to accept the partial refund and continue to the FOS for the rest.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx

 

This is the last couple of paragraphs of the letter....

 

What you need to do

 

If you're happy with the decision and would like us to refund you, please click on this link to tell us where to send the money.

We'll make any changes that are needed to your credit file.It may take up to 45 days for the changes to show in any reports your look at.

 

Our final response

 

This is our final response to your complaint. Please consider the settlement offer provided here as full & final.

You have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge - but must do so within six months of the date of this email.

If this complaint is not referred in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider this complaint and will only be able to do so in very

limited circumstances, for example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was as a result of exceptional circumstances.

 

 

What do you reckon?  Safe to take the refund and continue to pursue?  I do think i have a case to send to the ombudsman and hopefully if they agree, take a lager refund of all loans.  But as mentioned, i could really do with the extra money right now!!!

 

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, M4tttaylor said:

Please consider the settlement offer provided here as full & final.

 

aha the usual word 'consider' - they are assuming you DO....

 

well you don't !!....consider it as a F&F settlement to ALL your complaint,

 

simply write or email back stating thus and that you will now be forwarding the remaining unresolved issues in your complaint to the FOS. thank them for their kind partial offer which you gladly accept as a partial seeltement of some issues.

 

little tip send the FOS everything!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...