Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Direct tiles Warehouse - Faulty Tiles - Claim Issued


kammx4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes...but would look more professional with headers......Claimant v Defendant ...Court Name....and intro.....

 

In response to the DJ XXXXXX General Order dated xxxxx   please find attached statement of costs particularised.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No claim number and how do you intend to sign the SoT on a email ? You could email it to the court but I would also follow it with a posted hard copy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay.....

 

Can you not prepare a separate document without all the Networkrail gunf...and attach it to your email....its your claim and you have put all the effort in so far...why risk your claim being struck out for the sake of putting some effort into the presentation?

 

And does your court accept electronic submission

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be preferable...no short cuts in litigation and using an IPad is as useful as a bucket with a hole in it in litigation :biggrin1:

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Had this from the court today with a form to fill with my contact details. Ignore the 1st paragraph as they've made a mistake and have received all relevant paperwork. Is this the actual hearing do you think??. Thanks.

28.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the Order of the 30th Jan 2021 they state you have not complied with ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Directions hearing.....you need to follow the instructions by date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i missed the back page which i've attached.

 

It mentions that reasons to NOT want a remote hearing. As a lot of my case is physical evidence would i be better asking to go to court for the judge to view the evidence first hand?. Thanks.

 

 

today 2.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say that it is "physical evidence" – what do you mean? You mean that people are going to be there in person? Videos?

If you are simply referring to documents then you will certainly have to disclose all of your documents in advance but that probably wouldn't mean that you would need face-to-face hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual seeing in person of the damaged tiles under eyeglass inspection how a good tile should look and how it would be impossible to spot the issues under normal inspection. Would it be better for me for the judge to see in person these issues?. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that a judge would want this assessed by somebody in the business – possibly an expert.

If you could get a couple of competent very experienced – independent people to examine the tiles and to give their written reports then that would probably be very helpful. I don't think a judge would be prepared to look and to give his/her opinion because the judge very properly would say that they are not an expert and they are not qualified to do this

Link to post
Share on other sites

And have they reported specifically on the tiles and the fact that it wouldn't be immediately visible – in the way you have said?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks like a pretty competent report. If you have a second one of the same quality then I certainly don't think that you need to worry about having a remote hearing.

I'm trying to think whether tactically it would be a good idea to give the other side advance notice of this report so they can comment.

Anyway, as I've said, the judge won't agree to carry out their own inspection of the tiles because they will consider that they're not qualified and they will want to rely on expert testimony.

Just accept a remote hearing.

Don't forget that you will have do disclose all the documents that you intend to rely upon 21 days before the date of the hearing. You should be looking at the advice we give on organising your court bundle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its to set directions on how the claim will proceed.....if you still have concerns for the main hearing possibly inform the judge that the main hearing may require attendance and face to face....due to the nature of the claim.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i'll follow your advice and tell the judge on the day my concerns and but ive pictorial and reported evidence to view. Thanks and have a good bank holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's certainly unhelpful that you don't follow the instructions contained in an order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...