Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot and Barclaycard debt


Candice
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I too am having terrible trouble getting Cabot to give me a statement. In their last letter to me they said it was my sole responsiblity to prove payments made.

 

In the legal blurb asking for a copy of the credit agreement etc, it does say "your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account"

What does this mean exactly? Does it mean they have to provide a statement of payments etc or some other kind of statement?

 

Cheers,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot are under a legal obligation to provide a statement of account but I can't quote the Act. I am not sure if this is the same section of the Consumer Credit Act as the one requiring a copy agreement. However, the DPA can be used to get this information.

 

In addition, if you have correspondence from them after a general (ie non DPA) request from you for a statement, then I would send copies of your letter(s) and their response(s) to your local Trading Standards immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yeah I did the CCA 1974 request for the original credit agreement and a statement of account. I wrote them and within the week I had a reply from the Operations Manager saying my letter was being investigated, and telling me the name of my contact and the date I would receive my full response.

 

Considering the number of standardised responses I get from them, this letter was quite different and had actually been hand signed. I think it may have just worked :D

 

Will keep you updated as to exactly what I get back (but I don't know if you know much about me, I am pursuing claims against *26* DCA's and they can't all have the original credit agreement ;D)

Link to post
Share on other sites

26? my god - you have had a colourful life! I'd be quite interested in following your progress because I have had a lot of dealings with DCA's in my business which I don't want to publically announce because I am reasonably well known in the industry, but I have not only done business with them I too have had alot of trouble on the end of their antics through personal misdemenours, some I would gladly put out of business if I could.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi folks,

 

That information is very helpful - thanks :) I'm sent a CCA to Cabot who responded to me with, under their defition of "statement of account", is just a chronological list of all activity on my account, from the date the debt was purchased to the letters and telephone calls they made right up to my CCA request.

 

They make no note of the initial amount of the debt, how much they paid for it, what it currently stands at or anything other information relating to charges applied on it. I feel that there are lots of things missed off my request.

 

Also it advises me that Cabot are chasing the original creditor (Barclaycard) for the original agreement and this process may take 2 to 8 weeks and they "request my patience".

 

So does this means that, 12 days after my CCA request, and the fact they have yet to provide me with all the information including the original agreement, that they have broken the law? I'm unsure as to what to do now, but am happily your pawn if you want to use me to experiment. I'm up for a fight so if you suggest things for me to try out I'm more than willing.

 

Cheers for any advice and suggestions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

That information is very helpful - thanks :) I'm sent a CCA to Cabot who responded to me with, under their defition of "statement of account", is just a chronological list of all activity on my account, from the date the debt was purchased to the letters and telephone calls they made right up to my CCA request.

 

They make no note of the initial amount of the debt, how much they paid for it, what it currently stands at or anything other information relating to charges applied on it. I feel that there are lots of things missed off my request.

 

Also it advises me that Cabot are chasing the original creditor (Barclaycard) for the original agreement and this process may take 2 to 8 weeks and they "request my patience".

 

So does this means that, 12 days after my CCA request, and the fact they have yet to provide me with all the information including the original agreement, that they have broken the law? I'm unsure as to what to do now, but am happily your pawn if you want to use me to experiment. I'm up for a fight so if you suggest things for me to try out I'm more than willing.

 

Cheers for any advice and suggestions

 

Cabot seem to have a very real problem in providing financial information. A cynic might suggest that this is because once you start paying them they have you and you are going to carry on paying for a very long time no matter what the size of the debt is. An even bigger cynic would say that this financial fog allows them to add interest and all sorts of other charges onto the debt unlawfully and they're making it as difficult as possible to get to the bottom of it.

 

Have you made a DPA request. If not I would do so and make it clear that you want a statement of account as part of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...