Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds 10yrs old CCj now sold to cabot **WRITTEN OFF**


Recommended Posts

I have an old CCJ against me for £10k original creditor LLoyds

I never heard anything off them after the forthwith CCj was issued in 2009,

 

Late last year I got a letter to my home address from Cabot I knew what it was about, but thought they might not know about the CCJ so I sent statute barred letters and eventually got a reply with all of the CCJ info on it

 

I know it will be difficult for them to take it back to court,

The CCJ was raised  at my old home address and I still rent the property out and so have always received mail from it and it is also linked to my new address both of which have been on the CRA sites and electoral roll as lniked adresses so I have always been available.

 

Should I simply ignore the reply to the statute barred letter (there are no threats about going back to court on it) if not ignore I am unsure of how to reply 

Any assistance very much appreciated

 

Onlymeagain

Link to post
Share on other sites

It came off my credit file nearly 4 years ago so I've no worries there,I will ignore and take it as it comes these things dont stress me out any more. 

Just a thought doesnt the original creditor on the CCJ  have t be the one to try to enforce and Crapbots are not the original creditor

 

Thanks again peeps

onlymeagain

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Just a thought, I am now 65 and diagnosed with prostrate cancer -(no need to worry  very early very treatable).

thinking of my mortality and dying I wonder if it might crop up after my death (hopefully in many years to come)

Can they make a claim on my estate (mainly substantial insurenace poilicies), my wife and 10 YO daughter wouldnt be able to sort it out like me

Should I offer them £10 as full and final and to stop writing letters to me or tell them I am not going to pay fullstop.

 

At this time I am ignoring as there is no threat that  they are trying to come after me and with it now being 11years since ccj issued very unlikley they can come at me in any meaningful way

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk

It is the 1% that I am thinking about and my wife's ability to sort things out.

I realise it is likely to be difficult to enforce but I don't want to leave any problems behind and so i was thinking of trying to get them to back off even though my current tactic is to ignore as I can handle the issues as they come along whilst I am alive!

 

@Andyorchno It is not secured in any way and all I am getting is please pay us letters  no threats CCJ is now 11 years old

 

 

@Ethel Street

I hope the situation isn't going to arise any time soon!  Me too!!

 

When someone dies, their debts become a liability on their estate. The executor of the estate, or the administrator if no Will has been left, is responsible for paying any outstanding debts from the estate. If you owe a debt when you die your death does not extinguish the debt. It is still a debt of your estate. (The reverse is also true, if someone owes you money when you die they are still required to pay it to your Estate).

 

But Cabot/Lloyds have no more right to enforce the CCJ against your Estate after your death than they did before you died. They would still have to go to court and get permission to enforce it and all the advice given so far on this thread is that they would find that very hard to do. So they could not easily get the money from your Estate.

 

What I don't know though is where this would leave the Executors. In principle Executors are required to pay all debts of the estate before distributing what remains to beneficiaries. If they don't a creditor could proceed against the Executors personally. But are they required to pay a debt that they believe is unenforceable? I don't know, I've never seen any legal discussion of that situation.  This is the bit that is interesting  and possibly problematical for my recently deceased family and something I want to avoid now rather than risc it when I am gone

 

As £10k is quite a large sum of money it might be worth you spending a bit of it to get a legal opinion from a specialist Probate solicitor on what your Executors should do if this situation arose (from the solicitor who drew up your Will?).

  Good Idea but most solicitors will tell me the same that you have highlighted that the execuotrs have a duty to reapy all debts before Beneficiaries This could have potential problems for many on this site Would this same situation apply to old non ccj unenforcable debts that we have ll "Won or believe to be SB" Our legal experts on here will have a better insight to  the situation and what our goals and pitfalls are possibly even experience of a similar situation where a member of this site has died

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Andyorch said:

Given that its 11 years old and the judgment claimant has failed to do anything......no I wouldn't. With regards to other debts...not sure what you mean by " in probate " but if there is no estate then there is no pay...

I am likely to have a substantial estate .

Since the last recession and I lost everythiing to the banks I have built myself up again I aslo have several large insurance policies that will come into my estate.

The point I was trying to make is that if an old ccj could be clawed back by a credit cardot DCA then surely old SB debts would fall into the same category and executors would need to satisfy those too as technically they are still owed by many of us that have unenforcable CC Debts

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I continue to receive chase letters very other month from Cabot and have to date ignored them

 

This months letter states they will ask a company called resolve call to call at my home and "make contact with me"

what should my reply / action be in this situation

 

There was a template around at one time telling DC that you do not give them authority to call but I cant seem to find it

Only me again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I have recently made a will and would like to understand how to deal with an very old ccj bought by a DCA so that they dont try to claim on my estate when I die.

Pointers to other threads or advice welcomed

 

Onlymeagain

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to LLoyds 10yrs old CCj now sold to cabot - DCA Assigned debt and probate?

Things change

Ive got health issues  Ive been writing my will and learning about probate,

I could probably handle it if it was for someone else but my family couldn't

I am trying to tidy my issues up and dont want to leave this as a mess for my kids.

I want it out of the way and dont want to pay a scummy DCA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Consumer debts Do not "die with you" if the estate has enough value to cover them 

 

The onus is on the exectors to pay any outtanding debts prior to benficiaries, It may not be enforcable but it is still a debt and by ignoring it the executors could be liable by acknoweldgning it the DCA will gain 100% of the £12k ccj that they paid pennies for

 

During my lifetime I can ignore it but if they continue to send letters after my death then the executors my wife and child have a legal duty to sort it out/ pay it  and I dont want thm to be left with the hassle or the costs of doing so.

What is the best way to stop the letters now while I am alive

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Lloyds 10yrs old CCj now sold to cabot - DCA Assigned debt and probate?
  • 1 month later...

I took the bull by the horns as I didnt want any issues when I die and my beneficiaries unable to handle it

Result :Cabot have Closed their account

Letter states I Believe that you remain responsible for this account However due to the age of this and the time that has passed I have made the decision to close the account.

You will not be contacted by us or our agents again regarding this matter

Onlyme again

My letter to Cabot;

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS OR ANY OTHER DEBT OR ALLEGED DEBT TO YOU
I WILL NOT PAY ANY MONIES TO YOU FOR THIS OR ANY DEBT OR ALLEGED DEBT
In previous correspondence you state that the alleged debt is in relation to a County Court judgement in favour of Blackhorse/ Lloyds
You have shown no evidence of this or of transfer by The Court of any debt, CCJ or alleged debt to your company.
Should you believe that you have authority for this alleged debt please supply copies of all documents showing your entitlement
The original alleged debt is statute barred preventing you from you taking any action, I insist that you stop all contact with me in accordance with the limitations act 1980

The alleged CCJ being 13 years old cannot be enforced without an order from a court in favour the original creditor
The alleged CCJ cannot be enforced by you without the order from the court in your name
A court will not allow any changes to a CCJ without a further order
I will Not pay any debt to you alleged or otherwise without the order of a court in your favour
Should you continue to pursue me for this alleged debt I shall raise a complaint to the Financial Conduct Authority asking for their intervention
The consumer credit handbook states:
CONC 7.15.8R01/04/2014RP
firm must not continue to demand payment from a customer after the customer has stated that he will not be paying the debt because it is statute barred.

I am classified a vulnerable person due my various health issues, I insist that you stop any further letters or action
I ask that you confirm in writing that you have no further interest in this or any other alleged debt

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...