Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Arrow/Shoosmiths claim form - old MBNA card debt NI


Weejon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1647 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

dx100uk yes that is correct...N125

 

Sorry I didn't specify...It's with the court costs added that brings it to over £3000.

 

I did receive a claim pack..I was late on opening it.

With it being a Saturday I lodged my dispute online with the generic statue barred comments and phoned the court on the Monday..

thankfully they have took my dispute as priority as shoosmiths had not lodged a default decree yet.

 

Court says keep a better eye on your post and look out for your court date.

This is what I am looking to get prepared with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 yes that is correct...N125

 

Sorry I didn't specify...It's with the court costs added that brings it to over £3000.

 


So is it Small Claims or a Civil Bill  what have they expressed ?

 

Small claims

In general a small claim is one where the value to be claimed is not more than £3,000 and which does not relate to personal injuries, road traffic accidents, libel or slander, title to land, legacy or annuity or any property of a marriage.

If the total sum at issue between the same parties exceeds £3,000, the claimant must either:

  • proceed by abandoning any amount due over £3,000 (this will be expressly noted)
  • issue a civil bill in the County Court for a full hearing (up to £30,000)

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely small claims.

 

I have printed off CCA request and DSAR and will be posting a CCA and DSAR to arrow and a DSAR to MBNA first thing tommorrow.

 

I can't see the DSAR being returned by the court date tho as I believe it all moves quite fast over here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have issues about sending any DCA your signature

however in this case as its statute barred it does really matter

if you click SAR

and read all the posts there

I would include a CTAX copy

you only have to prove who/where you are today 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never actually sign anything. No legal reason why you must or should, its just a convention. No point giving them any ammo to fire back at you.

 You could put some XXXXs if you like, it wouldn't make a scrap of difference. 🤣

 

I just end a letter:

 

yours, blah.

 

 

noomill060

 

(Note gap where you would sign a letter normally)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

So I received my court date. Any evidence from both sides needs to be sent to the courts and opposing sides 10 days before the court date.

 No defense to file so this is where things differ from the rest of the UK.

Would bank statements be enough evidence to prove my statue barred case?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would but you'd have to do so much redacting as no way should you even show those to a claimant. Gives away far too much other data.

 

for want of clarification..it's for the claimant to prove a debt is not statute barred..not for a defendant to prove its not.

 

i have had one scottish claim like this.

i refused to let the fleecers in court see the statements and told the sheriff i was more than happy for him to view them privately.

 

he agreed and got may complete folder of every statement from 1982 till that date (2015) some 600 pages.

 

after a short recess!!..he ask me one further question..did i have any other ways of funding that i might of used..i said yes..he said what types..i said 2 other banks accounts of which both were joint and that i was not comfortable with disclosing the other party 's personal spending ..but had them and would disclose the statements if requested.

 

He asked was the paperwork as comprehensive as the one currently with him..i said yes..he said that will not be required you are under oath i take your word with a smile..

 

absolvitor issued..

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a very valid point.

This is the only instruction on the letter.

If I don't send proof of no payment to them then surely I could not use that as evidence in court.

Also any ideas how a bundle of evidence should be presented?

 

20191212_223833.jpg

Edited by Weejon
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 30th April 2012 the respondent defaulted on the terms of the credit card at which stage there was an outstanding balance of 3400.

 

On 21st Jun 2012 this debt was assigned to arrow global Guernsey Ltd.

 

Notice of the above assignment was issued to the respondent at the relevant time.

 

As a result of the above assignment any balance that remains due by the respondent arising out of the above mentioned credit card is now properly due to the applicant.

 

Following post default credits this balance has been reduced to 2900.

 

Please note that the customer last made a payment of 1.00 on 12th Dec 2014.

 

……..

 

30/03/12 balance £3400

20/10/19 balance £2900

                                ---------

                                  £500

so an exact round £500...strange that

 

even stranger that before 12/12/2014 ''post default credits' reduced the balance by exactly £499 ...note they do not use the word payments.

but they do when referring to the £1 

 

what date is the hearing?

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

look at the timeline in the poc carefully.

the a/c was defaulted 30th april

the A/C was not sold till 21st june, some 2mts later

 

I would suggest the £499 was refund of interest or charges or WHY from the OC, hence the different wording

to the phantom £1 payment some further 6mts later they claim by you.

 

the MBNA SAR will most probably clarify the 1st part and should be arriving well in time for your bundle exchange

 

at that time 2012 -14 were you ever aware of what questioning a debt was all about ?? or were involved in any other debt whereby you used a CCA request etc or were in any kind of debt management etc etc.. we don't have old thread history to guess your background.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They claim £1 payment was paid in 2014. I have bank statements going back to December 2012. They show no payments to the debt. Or even for any payments of £1. This is the only account I have held.

 

I have never used a cca request before and this is my first dealing with this type of thing. Never went into a debt management plan. 

 

I went onto the electoral register at my new address and then a shoosmiths letter arrived about a month later regarding this.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff.

await the CCA/SAR returns

sit on yours hands for now, but continue your research here on CAG.

 

there are 100's of either 

arrows card claimform.

or shoos or shoosmith claimform

 

threads here

 

use our custom google search box which comes up after hitting the top squares logo for above

wont hurt to read as many as you can.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...