Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Smart Meters A discussion


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 752 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks ploddertom

 

So EON, despite all the assurances on changed tactics, are still at the very least misleading customers (IMO) into a view that they have no choice but to have a SMART meter.

NO indication whatsoever that there is a choice.

No wonder EON declined to show us.

 

 

What have you told them ploddertom - if you don't mind telling us that is?

(That seems near as damn it to the one I received ages ago, where the telephone op also tried to tell me it was compulsory - so what changes have been made? Wonder if I still have it - Ill look this weekend)

 

 

 

Also strange that since declining the SMART meter, this 'important replacement of the meter has simply gone quiet.

 

I call Deceitful Bull Poop from EON

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello tobyjugg2 and I was talking primarily about changes to many of the letters we send about smart meters.

 

As above, these include statutory meter exchanges, updates about the roll-out of SMETS2 and upgrades to SMETS1 (posts #10 and #24 - 20 and 21 Nov).

 

 

We've changed the wording to make it clear smart meters are optional and customers can decline our offers to have them fitted.

My underlining and bold - malcs words

 

In light of silverfoxs' post above and simple 'accuracy, Care to clarify or correct your statement there Malc?

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought they would have had Wi-Fi enabled meters?

 

My understanding is that they are still installing smegs1 (oops typo) not smets2, let alone wifi enabled ones.

 

The letters dont inform the customers of that either.

 

 

While we are awaiting our response to the current content of the letters you are sending out ...

What are the customers rights of removal of SMART meters if they think they have been deceived into having one by your 'communications' be they snail mail, email or on the telephone Malc?

 

Perhaps that needs escalating with the various regulators and consumer action bodies (not just about EON but the process as a whole),

Particularly given the complete lack of any real benefits to the customer which don't seem to be outweighed by the atrocious problems (eg blatantly incorrect readings not trapped by suppliers and problems customers have addressing that) and simple lack of delivery of even the basic expected service (eg charged in line with use per readings) that far too many are seeing.

 

 

All these meters really seem to do is allow suppliers to change people on to pre pay (let alone cut them off) easily and without their consent, even if its unjustified and an error on the suppliers part

As some suppliers even seem to do a 'sanity check' when you submit readings on line, showing your last reading and with a 'are you sure' if you mistype or misread, why is that apparently not applied to the SMART (not) meter readings - seems a reduction in service to me

(I had this when my daughter left home as the usage dropped by nearly 40% - had to send in photo of meter - perhaps they only check when your usage reduces)

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

TY HB

Energy suppliers (E.ON) charging UK consumers hundreds of pounds to remove smart meters amid sharp increase in bills

(headline amended to reflect the actual contents of the report)

 

E.ON specifically, and no doubt others very happy to pressure/mislead you into an installation

(IMO and as seemingly demonstrated here)

- but if you think you are not getting anything out of it and want them removed  - pay up

 

"E.ON has been contacted but has not provided a comment at time of publication"

"EDF, Ovo and Octopus did not reply to a request for comment at time of publication."

"Scottish Power said it generally wouldn’t remove them at all"

"British Gas said costs are considered on a case by case basis but it is rare they get these types of requests. It added there could be a cost, however, it would not be hundreds of pounds."

 

 

INEWS.CO.UK

Some consumers choose to have smart meters removed if they have moved homes and prefer analogue devices or because they don't believe...

 

 

Edited by tobyjugg2

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

 

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...