Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unhelpful solicitors. Dodgy executors


nelson/13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2232 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Who has got the final and valid will?

What's the codicil about?

Usually when someone leaves a valid will, unless hidden close relatives appear, everything can be sorted quite easily.

The missing money is something to address after the inheritance has been distributed, so leave that to one side for the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's unclear why brother D, the executor and the one who has emptied the accounts, is attempting to over turn the codicil.

He's got the entire estate by the look of it, why would he do anything?

No estate means no inheritance, so the other brothers should be challenging brother D.

If brother D had power of attorney or joint accounts prior to your mother departure, it would be difficult to challenge him.

Can you please explain why he's challenging the codicil despite having taken the entire estate?

Is there a property that your mother left?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If brother D had power of attorneyicon or joint accounts prior to your mother departure, it would be difficult to challenge him.

 

 

 

That may not be the case, king. I've thought for a while that is seems to be easier to challenge an attorney than an executor. This link seems to apply to all of the UK.

 

 

 

https://www.gov.uk/report-concern-about-attorney-deputy

 

 

 

OP, you talk about your brother being a fiduciary, is this in Scotland?

 

 

 

HB

 

Hi HB,

That only applies while the person is alive if their money has been misused or stolen.

Once the person dies, they won't care because it becames a matter for the beneficiaries to challenge the person with power of attorney.

Brother D could simply claim that he used all the money to care for the mother and he's not obliged to keep any receipts.

Of course if the amount is excessive then it would be easier to challenge, for example if £10k/month came out of the account for a period of time.

A decent solicitor would advice against taking to court a person with power of attorney after death if the amount missing is not clearly excessive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want help you need to give us the details, otherwise we can't give you any advice based on "the matter is complicated"

How much money has disappeared?

Was your brother D the registered carer for your mum?

Did he share a bank account with her?

Is there a property in the estate?

Where's the second will come from and was it made by a solicitor or just one of the whsmith worthless diy will?

Was the will you have have been excluded made by a solicitor?

You said that you already spent 10k to help your little brother, if the potential inheritance is not 5 times that, i suggest you stop throwing money away and accept that sometimes justice cannot be done because there are no evidence.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...