Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You pushed me to look at all our MET cases going back till June 2014.  That's 10 years so at that point I got sick & stopped! MET have never, ever taken a Cagger as far as a court hearing in all that time. As scribbled above, they have issued court papers a few times but have always bottled before the hearing. In one exceptional case the motorist didn't even have to defend - the judge chucked out the case due to rubbish Particulars of Claim. Sadly in two cases MET got a judgment because the motorist didn't file a defence to the claim.  But in one of the cases MET still didn't get their money as the person said he was elderly, didn't need credit and would rather put up with a CCJ than pay MET! So that's who you're dealing with - paper tigers.  They do court in maybe 5% of cases but even then bottle before it gets to a hearing. Anyway, let's see what writing to BP produces.
    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with Wonga ruining my credit file


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am after some advice please if possible

 

Having had a number of loans with Wonga I eventually reached a point I could no longer afford to make the large payment back on my last loan, taken out in February of last year.

 

Before the payment was due at the end of March I raised a complaint of unaffordable lending and asked for a payment plan offering an amount I could afford to pay.

 

Wonga sent me an I&E sheet which I completed and sent back, then I heard nothing from them.

 

Next message was a couple of months later with a threat of court if I didn't pay,

which was a surprised as i'd offered an amount that they never came back to me on

 

After that a payment plan was agreed and I made 2 payment towards to loan.

In the meantime my complaint was rejected by Wonga,

 

sent to the FOS where it was upheld and Wonga agreed to a refund of £2.5k,

although £850 would be used to pay off the outstanding loan and all negative information removed from my credit account.

Not an issue, all sorted, balance was paid back to me at the start of October

 

In mid December I was contacted by Moorcroft about an outstanding loan with Wonga.

I logged into my Wonga account and it showed I still had an outstanding loan.

 

I then checked my Noddle report (I usually look at Experian but Wonga don't report to that).

My credit report showed not only was my loan not paid off,

but showed as defaulted in July.

 

I contacted Wonga who at first told me that the last loan hadn't been part of the arrangement (utter rubbish) but they would look into this.

 

Over the last few months of the year I had an MBNA credit card suspended and a catalogue account suspended due to "adverse information on my account"

 

Now Wonga have admitted they should have removed the loan and have asked Equifax and Call Credit to delete this.

 

Now that would be great if they hadn't done so much damage to my credit over the last 5 months.

Also looking at my Equifax file it shows my loan a month in arrears in Nov 2016 and then 2 months in Dec, up to 4 months in arrears.

 

All this before I even opened in the loan at the end of Feb.

The loan shows as AP (?) from March to June 2017 and then defaulted in July 2017, which is all total lies

 

Where do I stand with this?

I'm absolutely furious with Wonga,

but currently stuck in their 8 weeks complaints procedure (again),

but this whole saga is a shambles.

 

I have all of this documented on email.

 

Any advice would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response

 

I have the confirmation email from the adjudicator on 31st August that stated what they should do.

They didn't argue with any of it.

 

They left the first 3 loans on my credit file, which was as the adjudicator said.

They confirmed to the FOS they would work to the proposal put to them by the adjudicator, this was on the 25th September.

 

I received the confirmation calculation on the 3rd October 2017 and that was the last communication I had from Wonga until Moorcroft emailed me on the 19th December.

 

In that time I received no phone calls (my mobile hasn't changed since 2005), no emails and no letters in the post.

Wonga claimed they had rang me and had a list of when, so I asked for a copy of this but was told I would have to pay £10 for SAR!

 

I have quite a lot of Experian credit files but Wonga don't report on there.

I only set Noddle back up once Moorcroft got in touch, and also my Equifax report (the last one I had is a fews years old unfortunately)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this instance i believe you have further recourse to make a complaint. This is all dependant however on the info from the below;

 

Over the last few months of the year I had an MBNA credit card suspended and a catalogue account suspended due to "adverse information on my account"

 

If their mistake has caused you great detriment, damages may be brought in the form of a MCOL Court Claim and taking this through the legal channels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a screen shot of my Next account stating that it was suspended due to adverse info on my file.

I also spoke to MBNA who would not remove the suspension my credit card account for the same reason.

I have a letter from them telling me that this is why my account is suspended.

 

I no longer believe a word Wonga say, couldn't trust them to investigate my complaint properly and believe that no matter how much info I send them about the effect this has had on me, they aren't taking this seriously.

 

I suspect on Feb 15th when the 8 weeks is up I won't get a response as they are inundated with complaints.

I can't possibly think why!

 

I haven't even had an apology in writing yet.

Although I do get mad at times, and especially so with this,

i'm more than happy to get even, sadly this may have to be through MCOL.

 

I have no idea what a suitable compensation would be though.

 

Any ideas or cases studies would be great

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers id be on the phone to the FOS tomorrow!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx, they won't do anything unless Wonga have had 8 weeks, as they view it as a separate complaint to my original one last year. I emails the adjudicator the second Moorcroft got in touch and to be fair to her, se responded straight away, chased up Wonga to see what they were doing (after the New Year) and emailed me back. She saw this as a new complaint but added the info to my original one.

 

If i don't get something I feel is a suitable response then I will be looking at a complaint with the FOS (although complaints seem to be taking 3 months to be picked up at the moment), send everything to the FCA and see what i can do through MCOL. I'm sure a newspaper or 2 might be interested too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...