Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Horizon Parking ANPR PCN - Aylesbury Leisure Complex - I dispute that we parked


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1 Date of the infringement 6/12/2017

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 12/12/2017

3 Date received 14/12/2017

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [y/n?] no (at least not that I can see)

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes

 

6 Have you appealed? {y/n?] post up your appeal] yes - see below

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up yes - see below

 

7 Who is the parking company? Horizon Parking

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Aylesbury Leisure Complex, Aylesbury

 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. - Yes, IAS (POPLA)

 

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

 

If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here

 

Appeal email:

 

I’m really sorry that it appeared that we had parked at the Leisure Complex.

On the evening in question, my wife and I were taking our children to eat in Aylesbury (a town that we’re not familiar with).

 

 

Unfortunately, we got confused by the signs for Exchange Street Car Park and mistakenly pulled in to the small layby outside the Aylesbury Leisure Complex.

 

 

After pulling in we quickly realised our mistake,

but there was a delivery van in front of us that was pulled sufficiently far forwards as to be blocking our path,

and reversing back out onto the main road would have dangerous with the level of traffic (especially so close to the roundabout).

 

 

When we initially pulled in the driver was in the middle of the delivery.

Once the delivery was completed we waited for a while,

before I got out to ask the driver if he could move.

 

 

He was looking at something on his phone but apologised and then immediately drove off to allow us to exit.

 

I would greatly appreciate your understanding in our appeal of this PCN,

and hope that you are able to review the imagery from the cameras to confirm what I have described above.

 

Response:

Thank you for your correspondence regarding the above Parking Charge Notice.

 

I can confirm the Parking Charge Notice was issued correctly and legally in accordance with the British Parking Associations (BPA) Code of Conduct

 

Signage throughout the car park is compliant with the BPA rules and regulations.

The signage is quite clear in its intent and is located throughout the car park.

 

 

When parking on private land it is the driver’s responsibility to ensure they adhere to the terms of the conditions of the car park.

 

 

As vehicle XXXXXXX was found to be parked in a no parking area, a Parking Charge Notice was correctly issued

 

The land is private property and signage within the private car park clearly set out the rules and regulations of the car park.

When parking on private land,

a motorist freely enters into an agreement to abide by the conditions of parking in return for permission to park therefore if the driver fails to comply with the terms and conditions a Parking Charge Notice will be correctly issued.

 

In light of this, your representations have been carefully considered and rejected.

Edited by Andyorch
Reg removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to edit that post to remove your registration number.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your email we always be ignored and they will use the new information to harass you.

 

Now,

how long do they say you were parked for?

If less than 10 minutes they know that they havent followed the BPA CoP and are telling porkies.

 

Do not bother with further correspondence at this stage and BLOCK their email address as spam.

 

You have done every wrong thing it is about possible to do when dealing with these bandits

but no matter,

it wont make a difference in the long run

but you wont get a speedy resolution to this because they are greedy and less than honest people

and now believe that you are worried enough to submit to pressure to pay them if they apply enough.

 

Read a large number of thread about the rigmarole they put people through

and you will then expect more letters from them followed by letters from debt collection agencies

and finally threatograms from a disreputable firm of solicitors.

 

You can ignore everything up to the dodgy lawyer point and then let them know that you know their game and are calling their bluff.

 

By then you will be aware of what to say in response but we will help you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Now that you sent the appeal, did Horizon issue you with a POPLA code?

 

As members of the BPA they MUST follow the guidelines attached to the membership.

 

We could do with seeing the letters sent to you but suitably redacted to remove all personal details, bar codes, reference numbers etc.

 

You will also need to go back and get pictures of the signage on site. This is due to the need to present a defence should Horizon decide to take court action. So far in 2017 they have issued over 70,000 tickets but only took court action in 35 of those so the odds of this going to court are slim but not impossible.

 

I would suggest that you carry on with the second part of the appeals process but stick to factual matters only. POPLA are not allowed to use mitigating factors so, you went into the site but could not progress further due to the blocking. You could not safely reverse away so you had to wait. If you were on site for less than 10 minutes then state this.

Once we can see the signage we may be able to assist better

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...