Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice sought - Old Debts looking to settle!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OH dear, welcome to CAG.

 

You are unfortunately what is called a ''Cash cow''.

 

They know this and are bleeding you dry of money you quite possibly don't owe!.

 

There is absolutely zero point in offering them anything, as it won't affect your credit file one bit, once a default is on there, there it remains for 6 years until it auto drops off.

 

Who are you paying currently?

 

When did you last pay anything toward any of these debts, list them all.

 

If you haven't paid anything for 6 years then they are time barred.

 

Name ALL of the powerless debt collectors who are robbing you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Opened Date Type Original CCA Total Payments

2000 OD Barclays Direct £26,000 £1 SAR (£10) to Sharklays and reclaim ALL of their fees and charges.

Mar-05 CC RBS Moorcroft £730 £1 CCA Request to moorcr@p, once they fail stop paying.

Aug-04 CC Natwest Direct £2,300 £1 CCA Natpest & reclaim all of their charges.

Nov-07 CC Mint Direct £11,000 £1 CCA Mint, reclaim all charges.

Mar-07 CC Tesco Direct £3,200 £1 CCA Tesco.

Feb-00 CC Barclaycard Cabot £10,700 £5 CCA Sharklaycard, reclaim all fees charges and stop paying Cabrot.

Jun-07 CC Halifax Cabot £8,700 £1 CCA Shallowfax,

May-07 CC Virgin PRA £13,500 £1 Sold to Vardo Stop paying.

Jun-07 CC Egg Moorcroft £2,500 £1 Sold to Arrow Stop paying.

Jul-05 LOAN Barclays Direct £250 £1 no correspondance re this Stop paying.

Jul-08 LOAN Santandar Moorcroft? £11,500 £1 They marked it as satisfied in 2010 but still send default notices

 

In short, you're being mugged off here, and throwing money away, they have to provide you with the evidence that not only do you owe this, but that they have all of the correct paperwork to enforce in court, which most pre 2007 agreements won't have, and I guarantee that 9 times out of 19 the response you'll get back is that ''Due to the age of the accounts the agreement cannot be found, however you have a moral obligation to pay blah blah blah!

 

CCA's cost £1

SAR's £10

  • Confused 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you think i should do about santander

- they marked it as satisfied..

. they still send me account in default letters once a year.

 

Send a CCA to them too, but as Moorcr@p are the gophers for them, send it to them, don't sign ANY of the postal orders, just leave them blank.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, don't forget they have 12+2 working days to supply yo with the agreement, when they DON'T, then you can, and should STOP paying, otherwise they'll string you along forever.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...