Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot to Robinson Way - Old Natwest 2013 Credit Card Debt


gio123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2704 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I defaulted on a Natwest credit card in 2013.

I haven't made any payments to Natwest or any DCA since this.

I've had Moorcroft, Wescot, Cabot and now Robinson Way on my back.

 

Natwest have defaulted me on my credit file and I notice that Cabot have also done (using the same default date that Natwest did).

 

I've now recieved a letter from Robinson Way saying that Cabot have passed them the debt.

What does this mean and should I send the CCA request?

 

Is there any hope in getting the Cabot default removed as I have never acknowledged the debt in writing to them

- the only communication I have had was a couple of loose conversations about a F&F offer (about 35%) which they clearly didn't accept.

 

I also don't want Robinson Way putting a third default (albeit with the same date) for the same debt!!

 

Would appreciate anyones help as how to proceed as it's hard to keep up with.

 

 

I was prepared to make a full and final offer to Cabot,

so am not opposed to making one to this new lot,

but am confused why Cabot have defaulted me and then passed the debt on.

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

When did you take this card out with Natpest?

 

As for your credit file, ONLY the name changes, the date will always stay the same, you won't have three separate defaults for the same debt.

 

Although it won't be unheard of for multiple entries being entered for the same debt.

If that is the case then you need to contact the credit ref company and tell them that the data they're processing is inaccurate and needs changing.

 

If they have offered you a discount, then alarm bells should be ringing, are there a lot of fees & charges on this account?

 

They can all be reclaimed under the hardship rules.

 

Have you got the full histroy of this account?

 

Lastly, keep EVERYTHING in writing, DO NOT be drawn into any telephone conversations with anyone regarding this, if they ring, laugh and hang up.

 

Keep a diary of events also for your records.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazooka Boo

 

I took out the card in 2011.

From what you say, the default from Cabot shouldn't be on the credit file as there is already a default from Natwest? Apologies if I am being a bit slow to understand.

 

The balance is approx £2133.

There are not many charges on the account

(relatively speaking and I would safely say these are under £100).

I din't have the full history of letters from each DCA.

 

What would you suggest doing as the next step?

I would quite like to have the weight of this off my shoulders and could afford a F&F payment of about 50% (gift from relative).

 

 

But obviously I want to try and restore some normality to my credit file.

I've not had any late payments or other defaults apart from this Natwest (and Cabot) one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, now the default is on your file, there it will stay for 6 years when it will auto drop off never to return, paid or not!

 

A F&F payment won't help in the slightest, no matter what they purport in their puerile missives.

 

The fact that it is doing the rounds is a good indicator that something is wrong with this 'toxic debt', otherwise the bank would have forced you to repay them, NOT flogged it on for pennies in the pound to a powerless DCA.

 

I think it might be a good idea to fire of a SAR (£10) to the bank and get the entire history of this card, and you can then look at how this amount is made up.

 

What's the last letter Robbersway sent you regarding this?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the amount is made up from approx £2020 of spending, then the remaining £100 or so is late payment fees leading up to the default.

 

No other interest has been added and the debt amount has always stuck at the same amount (£2133.20).

 

The letter I received from Robinson Way is the first I have heard from them.

It said that Cabot have passed the debt to them as Cabot have been unsuccessful in receiving payment for it.

 

Ultimately what I want to avoid is a CCJ.

 

Shall I ask Robinson Way for the CCA agreement and see what they have to say for themselves?

 

In the past I have also had a letter from Natwest which stated they had sold the debt to Cabot. Not sure if that helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter how many times the same debt is defaulted it does hurt your file any more than the one.

 

 

i'm puzzled...

 

 

what are robbersway [part of the hoist H2HP group] doing chasing a debt for another DCA that are not even part of their group?

strange bedfellows indeed...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also confused why they are suddenly chasing it.

 

 

It says it has been passed on to them from Cabot

- presumably this means sold!

 

 

It is also accompanied by another letter from Cabot saying they have passed it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah no read the letter properly

doesn't say passed on

its been sold

you have a notice of assignment in your hand

 

 

that all makes sense.

 

 

though again strange the oc sold it

then a debt buyer sold it

 

 

so there mucho wrong with it somewhere that you've not spotted yet.

 

 

SAR time to the OC.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

get all the statements etc etc

that will allow you [us] to findout why they sold it hopefully

and why its been sold around

 

 

typically, for a debt of this young age and value they normally go direct to court as they can see an easy win.

they are not, that makes me suspicious.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to date all you've had is a notice of assignment?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...