Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just received a letter saying that IDR has been passed a file relating to a debt with Commercial Bank of Qatar. No other details, no specifics. If I don't respond, they will assume they have the correct address (which they do) but say please phone within 7 days. I worked in Qatar 2003-2006 then went to the UAE. I did have a credit card with CBQ and it seems I didn't clear it - visited Qatar a few years later and was barred from leaving the country. Long story short - settled the debt, having negotiated a settlement and the exit ban was lifted. I have heard nothing since until this letter but, as far as I am concerned, there is no debt. I'm not sure I actually have any documentary evidence though. I'm planning on ignoring this to see if anything "official" happens but, as far as I can see, this is long past the statute of limitations of 15 years anyway Should I do anything more?
    • a CCJ does not 'expire' thus does not need any application to a court to 'extend it'. if a CCJ has not been enforced within 6yrs, then it is very unlikely any court would grant such should the claimant return to court, of which the defendant would be advised -( unless they have moved and not informed the court & the claimant such) .  
    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NRAM Together


user1979
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2824 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have one of the infamous NRAM Together mortgages with the separate unsecured loan,

 

now a few years back following a relationship breakup I was struggling to pay the mortgage on my own so came to an agreement to pay the full mortgage amount but drop the unsecured element to a token payment of a couple of pounds a month.

 

Now fast forward to today

 

I'm still paying the token amount but NRAM haven't ever defaulted the unsecured loan and just report it to the CRA as sustained arrears,

 

I've been working hard to clean up my Credit record following mess from the split and this is the only thing left,

 

is there anything I can do to request NRAM to default it so it will eventually drop off,

otherwise it will be harming my Credit forever which seems very unfair?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like you need to send them an SAR

get all the statements

as I bet you've heaps of various insurance to reclaim

and all manne of Penalty fees [arrears/letter/late/etc ]

 

all can be reclaimed

 

as fgor the CRA file

 

write and state the continued markers since xx date are unfair under ICO guidelines

 

could they please consider entering a backdated default equivalent to the third short payment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Interesting point dx

 

I'm in a very similar position as the OP. I was actually at the point of writing to nram tonight when i came across this thread.

 

the Together loan is going to take 10+ years before the arrears are paid off and I wish they'd defaulted back in 2010 when everyone else did!

 

Can you elaborate on your statement about the arrears marker being unfair under ICO guidelines please?

 

Is backdating defaults a "thing"?! Never heard of that, and in principle it sounds like a good idea, but isn't there a danger that they could follow it up with court action?

 

I'm now in a position where I'm paying the normal payment and £30 off the arrears, although the interest rate is still at 0% which is nice to have, but if I could have the debt defaulted and backdated to 2010 then they could have just £30 a month! Tonight I Was going to write to nram and ask them nicely if they would consider capitalising the arrears onto the loan, and recalculating the payment over the remaining term, but I think I'd much rather go down the backdated default option.

 

Anyone any idea who I'd need to write to at NRAM?

 

Thanks for your insight as always, and apologies for hijacking the OP's thread :-D

Edited by bradfordlad
added a bit

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx - some of the posts are quite old and documents don't exist, but there was one interesting post by Brigadier2JCS http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416296-Defaults-the-ICO-has-published-new-guidance-(Jan-1-2014).&p=4475253&viewfull=1#post4475253

 

Here he (?) states that NOT registering a default would disadvantage the debtor in comparison to someone who makes no effort to pay their debts but has a default entry removed from CRA files after 6 years paid or not.

 

Is anyone aware of anywhere "official" I could quote this to nram? I've been googling it all morning and can't find a thing!!

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the ico guide line PDF

 

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off, paying now or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.}

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

.

NOTE: {the bracketed text is not ICO guideline but my advise]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the ico guide line PDF

 

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off, paying now or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.}

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

.

NOTE: {the bracketed text is not ICO guideline but my advise]

 

Thanks again! So the case comes down to this: nram should have issued a default notice when our loan was between 3 & 6 months in arrears. They didn't as we had an agreement to make reduced payments due to a self managed DMP. The arrears built up and 3 months ago I offered to reinstate full payment and £30 to the arrears.

 

I will now argue that according to ICO guidelines, they should have defaulted the account, and I am now requesting that they do as they should have done, and issue a backdated DN to the date when the account hit 6 months arrears (Obviously I'll check when that was), on the basis that we are being disadvantaged for maintaining some element of payment.

 

One more question then - as it's the unsecured element of a Together mortgage, would they be likely to try & secure the loan on our property? Presumably if we keep up repayment of the debt (accepting that the debt is wiped off just because they've defaulted) they wouldn't be allowed to secure it?

 

Thanks so much dx :)

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres much debate here and elsewhere that they shouldn't ever convert non secured to secured.

 

 

bottom line is they cant without going to court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But we all know that what lenders can/can't do, versus what they ACTUALLY do are worlds apart!

 

I don't think it'd get past a judge if you were already making payments to the debt anyway.

 

I'll start my own thread about the proposed letter in case anyone else is looking for advice. Cheers :)

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...