Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2830 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

Firstly i'm new here so please bear with me :-)

i have been trying to get a a default removed rom my credit file that started out as £12 that i did not realise was outstanding. The debt has been paid in full once i found it on my credit file (£67).

 

Lowell have placed a default on my file and i sent an email to get further information and to ask for its removal.

 

I have received the following from them, how can i now progress?

Good morning,

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Lowell reference ..........

 

We acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.

 

We note all your comments and have investigated the matter.

 

We note that you state that we are in breach of Section 87(1) of the CCA 1974 and that you received no such default notice for the account . The default notice is a one off document that is issued by the original creditor at the point when the borrower ceases to pay the required predetermined payments. As your dispute is in relation to the adding of the default in the first instance and therefore existed prior to sale of the account to us, then it would remain the responsibility of the original creditor to resolve. Therefore, any issue that you feel that you have in this respect would need to be addressed by the original creditor and not Lowell.

 

We are not prepared to remove any default registered with the credit reference agencies in respect of this account as we consider that this data remains correct and accurate. This information will remain on your credit file for a period of 6 years from the date of default.

 

The account has been paid in full and now closed and therefore you have accepted liability of the account.

 

Should we receive any similar correspondence from you regarding this account, we will not be providing a response. If, however, you do have any specific questions regarding the content of this email, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Colette

Customer Services, Lowell Group

 

 

Many thanks in advance for taking the time to help!

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

also the default on my credit file sits under Lowell i don't actually know who the original creditor is for sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly they are correct.

 

the OC would have defaulted the debt before sale.

 

paying off a debt will not ever remove a default nor improve your score

 

the credit file should tell you the type of debt it was

 

there is also no need for a DN to be sent though I suspect you've moved in recent times

and never informed your creditors

so everything chasing the debt was sent to an old address anyway?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Lowell are notorious for filing defaults on people's credit files and at the rate they do it, I am sure it is vindictive.

 

As the original debt was for only £12 and was paid, to then file a default that lasts 6 years may be correct, but it smacks of being excessive to me.

 

I would write to the Information Commissioner's Office informing then of Lowell's actions. Many people have done it before and the ICO tells them to remove the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freyfrey

the £12 debt was defaulted by your original creditor not Lowell.

 

As you do not know who that was it would be an idea to write and ask Lowell although surprised that you would have paid without checking that the amount was genuinely owed.

 

I agree that to default an amount that low is harsh but you can ask the Credit Reference agency to put a note of correction on your file to the effect that you were unaware of the debt at the time and once you discovered it, you cleared the amount.

If you acknowledge that the £12 was indeed owed, then the default was correct.

 

You mentioned a figure of £67 which I assume was the amount including charges that the debt had become before you paid it.

I would have kicked up a real stink and never have paid an amount like that-totally out of proportion to the £12.

 

When writing to Lowell you should also ask what charges they applied if any to the £12 and if they did when and why they were applied.

 

As it is,whatever slim chance you may have had in getting the default removed went when you paid the whole amount off without attempting to have the default removed in exchange.

 

Once you know who the £12 was owed to you can then find out what it was for and what charges they applied afterwards. What date was the £12 applied?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...