Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claim form Moon Beever / 1st Credit HSBC overdraft debt


nas2211
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Name of the Claimant ? 1st Credit (Finance) Limited

 

Date of issue - 27 Jan 2016

 

Date to submit defence = Friday 26th Feb by 4pm

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

 

1.The Claimant is the assignee of a HSBC Bank Plc debt in the sum of £3,072 assigned on xx/01/2015.

Statutory notices of assignment were sent to the defendant.

2.The debt is for arrears on an overdraft facility first opened by the original creditor on or about xx/01/2008 under reference xxxxxx/xxxxxxxx. The defendant used the credit facilities.

3.On xx/01/2014 the account defaulted with an outstanding balance of £2,835.

The claimant and its predecessors in title demanded repayment of the sum due.

In breach of contract the defendant failed to repay the sums due.

 

What is the value of the claim? £3072 plus costs

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Overdraft

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. 1st credit

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Redundancy causing financial issues

 

What was the date of your last payment? Late 2013

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

Link to post
Share on other sites

A family member is in a position to gift me some funds to settle this debt.

 

My question do I contact 1st Credit directly to negotiate a settlement figure?

If so, I'm not sure what I should return from the pack in the meantime.

 

I'm not willing to admit the full amount as it appears to have increased from the original c£2800 that I've just checked

and is listed on my credit file against 1st Credit.

 

I'd like to settle it and avoid a CCJ against my name.

If anyone can advise what steps I should take,

 

I would be very grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi nas

 

You have 33 days in total to deal with the claim if you are intending to defend all....only by defending all can you possibly avoid a CCJ...partial admittance will result in a CCJ for the admitted part.

 

So 19 days (from the date on the claim the date being day 1) to acknowledge service..... this can be done on line using MCOL once you have registered to use the service..as can your defence...so there is no need to use or post anything from the claim pack...but keep it safe.

 

You then have a further 14 days to submit your defence...so 33 in total.

 

I would start with sending the following to the claimants solicitor named on the claim.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387483-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-when-Claim-is-being-made-for-a-Current-Account

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please note the amended date by which your defence needs to be filed.

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, thank you for your advice. Am I right in thinking that if judgement is made against me, but I pay the amount claimed in full within 30 days of judgement, then a CCJ won't be registered on my credit file?

 

My main concern is that I intend on getting my first mortgage next year, and a CCJ registered against me will make that nearly impossible.

 

I don't deny that that I used the overdraft facility, and I am in a position to be pay the amount originally owing, so I wasn't sure if I should just bite the bullet and pay it all now, or if it is possible to negotiate a settlement figure without a CCJ being registered for years against me.

 

Many thanks,

Nas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, thank you for your advice. Am I right in thinking that if judgement is made against me, but I pay the amount claimed in full within 30 days of judgement, then a CCJ won't be registered on my credit file? Correct or by the date stated on the judgment notice

 

My main concern is that I intend on getting my first mortgage next year, and a CCJ registered against me will make that nearly impossible.

 

I don't deny that that I used the overdraft facility, and I am in a position to be pay the amount originally owing, so I wasn't sure if I should just bite the bullet and pay it all now, or if it is possible to negotiate a settlement figure without a CCJ being registered for years against me.That is were defending this claim comes in...you can accept for ease and lack of aggravation pay what they request...even though it probably consists of 50% unfair charges and unlawful charges applied after assignment or you can challenge it and force the claimant to negotiate.

 

Be aware that a claim only becomes equal if defended and challenged if you accept or do not respond it's a default judgment which you have no say in the matter. So any defence is a means to seek clarification

 

Many thanks,

Nas

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really clear and useful advice Andy, thank you. I will follow your advice in sending the letter to the solicitors in the first instance, and register my intention to defend online.

 

Many thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So yesterday I acknowledged service and logged my intention to defend. Then today I receive a voicemail from someone at 1st Credit (haven't had a call from them before) saying I should contact them urgently.

 

I've sent the recommended letter to their solicitors today by registered post, so I am assuming I should ignore the voicemail and wait for a response to my letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'd not

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't call them back

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Moon Beever today which reads as follows:

 

Dear Madam

 

1st Credit (Finance) Limited vs xxx

 

We refer to the above matter and your letter of 5 February 2016.

 

We have requested copies of the documents listed in your letter from our client and will revert to you once they have been received.

 

Yours faithfully

 

I'm still continuing to get daily calls from 1st Credit which I'm ignoring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent ....so we wait....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter received today...

 

Dear Madam

 

1st Credit Finance Ltd v xxxx

 

Please find attached documentation as requested.

 

Our client has confirmed that they have previously sent you this information and any dispute has therefore been resolved.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Moon Beever

 

Enclosed is a thick bundle of printed pages of personal banking terms and conditions, and an electronic text version of a final demand letter with no identifying features of who it's from, but dated 14 November 2013 and likely to be from HSBC.

 

I have not previously received information from 1st Credit as claimed in the letter from Moon Beever.

 

None of the other documentation I had requested is enclosed.

 

How should I respond or proceed?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO hold your nerve

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think what you have received will be enough to convince the Court on the balance of probabilities ...nas?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think what you have received will be enough to convince the Court on the balance of probabilities ...nas?

 

Possibly not, as there's nothing that shows the process that should have been followed or the debt being assigned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait and see if they wish to proceed then.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im a bit concerned that their letter reads as if it's in my hands now,

as if I'd already been provided with the information I was asking for (which I haven't been).

 

 

Should I write back and say they haven't complied with my request,

or just leave it and write that in my defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no as post 21

next move is the claimants

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not heard anything further in writing, although I'm receiving daily calls from who I believe is 1st Credit, which I'm not answering.

 

My deadline for defence is this Friday 26th Feb, so I'm wondering how I should start drafting this?

 

Any guidance that can be offered will be much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...