Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

General Lloyds ppi question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am hoping someone can answer this Lloyds ppi question for me.

 

Before I actually ask this is more so I understand than wanting help at this moment in time.

 

 

The question I have is in regards to a Lloyds assit card that was taken out on 24 April 2001

 

I found some old statements and it had something called a CPP on it which disappeared around 2006 and ppi started to show instead on the statements.

 

So my question (s) are:

 

1) What actually is CPP and how is it different to ppi?

 

2) If someone was claiming them been mis-sold (for whatever reason) would it be one claim for both or two separate claims?

 

And a couple of unrelated questions:

 

1) Out of all the Credit ref companies which is the best between Noddle, Clearscore & Experian?

The reason I ask is because on noddle it says that an account is open but on clearscore it says the account is closed

and even though I just received my £2 report from Experian I don't understand what is open or closed on there.

 

2) If on my credit report it says that an account is settled and has a £0 balance by the original lender

but DCA (Lowells) says there is still a balance owing. What does that mean?

 

3) On my credit report a DCA is shown to have updated three different times for the same account.

 

On noodle it shows - 7th September (account open)

On clearscore it says - 15th September (account closed)

On Experian it says - 20th September (account open? not sure due to the fact I can't figure out how to read there paper reports)

 

Which of those dates is the correct one? Also, can a DCA open and close the account like this?

 

Thank you for any replies I may get and I do apologise for all the questions but I just want to get an idea how to understand all this and if I don't ask then I will never know. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping someone can answer this Lloyds ppi question for me.

 

Before I actually ask this is more so I understand than wanting help at this moment in time. The question I have is in regards to a Lloyds assit card that was taken out on 24 April 2001

 

I found some old statements and it had something called a CPP on it which disappeared around 2006 and ppi started to show instead on the statements.

 

So my question (s) are:

 

1) What actually is CPP and how is it different to ppi?

 

It stands for card protection plan. It is a product designed to protect you in the event of theft/fraudulent use of your card. The key is that in most cases they were pretty unnecessary since you are already protected from this under (I think) section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. PPI is a different product which protects your credit repayments by making them for you if you are unable to work due to accident, sickness or involuntary unemployment.

 

2) If someone was claiming them been mis-sold (for whatever reason) would it be one claim for both or two separate claims?

 

They are separate products and if one started around the time the other finished, this is almost certainly entirely coincidental. Therefore, if you want to make a complaint about missale, each would be a separate issue.

 

And a couple of unrelated questions:

 

1) Out of all the Credit ref companies which is the best between Noddle, Clearscore & Experian? The reason I ask is because on noddle it says that an account is open but on clearscore it says the account is closed and even though I just received my £2 report from Experian I don't understand what is open or closed on there.

 

I don't have credit anymore and have only ever used Experian so not totally sure. Typically they only go back six years in any case. In any case, this is of no real relevance to a complaint about insurance missale.

 

2) If on my credit report it says that an account is settled and has a £0 balance by the original lender but DCA (Lowells) says there is still a balance owing. What does that mean?

 

I would think that it means the debt has been sold on by the original lender to Lowells. I.e. you no longer owe anything to the original lender, but instead owe the money to Lowells.

 

3) On my credit report a DCA is shown to have updated three different times for the same account.

 

On noodle it shows - 7th September (account open)

On clearscore it says - 15th September (account closed)

On Experian it says - 20th September (account open? not sure due to the fact I can't figure out how to read there paper reports)

 

Which of those dates is the correct one? Also, can a DCA open and close the account like this?

 

The dates are just the date that the record was updated. There may have been an error in one of the updates. Unfortunately, this is not a "get out of jail free" card with regards to repaying the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPP can be reclaimed see our CPP forum.

 

 

by the look of your credit file

 

 

looks like this debt has been written off by Lloyds and sold to a debt buyer

 

 

that rings alarms bells...not paying any DCA's anything are you?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply, dx100uk. :)

 

There is a CPP forum? Where would a found that, please? I have looked in the banks forums and I can't seem to locate it. I am looking in the right place?

 

No, I haven't touched this debt since Oct/Nov 2011 and according to my credit report it defaulted in 29/6/12. Why does that ring alarm bells?

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?356-CPP-Group-Plc

 

 

....

 

 

why would a big multinational sell a debt on

and not take you to court....urm........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the link I will check out some of the threads there.

 

I am probably missing something obvious here.

 

 

But why would they do that?

 

 

Sorry that I am a little slow on the up take

 

 

a few months I suffered a head injury and it takes me a while to get things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds would crush joe public in court.....

 

 

but you see

the debt is mostly CPP and PPI

and prob loads of PENALTY fees in there too..late/over/letter.

 

 

I think I'd get that sar from Lloyds

and weigh up if its worth reclaiming.

 

 

or keeping quiet

 

 

are lowlife hassling you by threat o grams?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for explaining. Yes, I think getting a SAR would be good to get the full picture.

 

In regards to Lowell's I haven't heard a peep from them and only knew about them through seeing them on my credit report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...