Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blackhorse ppi help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I have recently submitted a ppi claim for some close friends, I have done this the same way as I have allways done with a covering letter and a fos questionaire.

 

 

This is for two loans, the first for £1k the second for £8k to consolidate the first.

 

Blackhorse have responded to the complaint asking them to fill in there own questionaire for each loan

 

 

and seem to be treating them as individuals even though it is in joint names.

 

Now are they obliged to fill in blackhorses questionaire even though I have Sent the fos questionaire.

 

Also I have now discovered through bank statements that the £8k loan was consolidated with another loan from Blackhorse

 

 

12months later yet there is no mention of this in there SAR.

 

Any thoughts on how to respond to this.

 

Thanks.

Bigboj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Without phoning them and finding out why they seem to be treating the joint loans as individual I'm not sure how you would find out.

I'd fill in their questionnaires and see what their reply is.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

 

Black horse have now responded and they've upheld my friends claim, however they seem to have calculated there refund on a alternative redress.

 

Are they allowed to do this? There is a 10k difference to what they should have refunded them.

 

Thanks in advance

Bigboj

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

How did you calculate the redress and what sort of figures are they.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't seem to be getting this, are you saying you calculated what they would be due as the three loans you have posted amounting to £8,850.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you calculated the redress through refinanced calculations as link 1 below?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will try and explain in a different way

 

Cost of ppi £2,207,08 paid as single premium so total amount borrowed £7,207,08

 

7 payments made before being settled, total refund offered with interest £694.81

 

Now this dosnt sound right to me because there only refunding the payments that contributed to ppi part of the loan and not the 2,207,08 which was the cost of the policy

Bigboj

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to READ link 1 below.

 

 

you seem to be quite ok on PPI reclaiming

going by your other threads.

but I'm wondering if you understand the PPIPCM and rollover of PPI to the next loan process

that link 1 below runs thru ok?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx

 

 

I have read it but it dosnt make sense

 

 

because I've gone through the sar and

 

 

it looks like after each loan was settled the ppi didn't roll over to the next loan

 

 

and no rebate was received.

 

I will try and scan the cca and soc and there offer letter tomorrow,something dosnt seem right with it

Bigboj

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you said you'd calculated the expected redress so how did you do this without using the correct method described in link 1

that's what im getting at.

 

 

PPI DOES rollover unless you get a rebate listed in the previous loans last statement.

 

 

so you need to do the simple calcs.

 

 

PPI/loa

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...