Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank paying out on business loans PPI - but a question regarding charges.?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been pursuing my old business account with LTSB.

 

 

I had a series of business loans and OD facilities.

 

 

As one loan paid off the previous one I have had an offer from the bank dating back to a loan I took out in about 1994

- the result is a large offer from them.

 

Great news indeed!!

 

Now along the way there were a significant number of charges for my going over my OD limit.

I would guess around £7-10k.

 

 

On the basis that they charged me for the PPI which they have now effectively said was wrong,

can / should I pursue these bank charges which are effectively as a consequence of them taking money for a mis-sold product?

 

Does anyone have experience of this?

 

I should get the offer letter from the bank so can check to see if they have taken this into account.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they should be taking that scenario into account now on ALL PPI refunds

if the PPI was not there - would the charge have been lievied.

 

 

I hope you've sar'd them and got ALL the statements for these loans?

 

 

if not, and esp as they were refinanced several times

you could be in for a substantial windfall.

 

 

I would NOT be accepting any offer until you do some spreadsheets

link 1 below refers.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have all statements dating back to about 1998. Just glancing through them now.

 

Once I see the offer letter I shall fond out what they have based their figures on.

 

 

I think they have given a flat rate on some of the older loans as they no longer have the information.

 

 

I'm amazed they have back dated so far on the basis that the loans all ran into each other over that period of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds flat rate was £1200 if memory serves me

they could get off lightly here if you are not careful.

 

 

did you fwd the info you have?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds flat rate was £1200 if memory serves me

they could get off lightly here if you are not careful.

 

 

did you fwd the info you have?

 

 

Did send the figures as I didn't have the specifics to hand at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well it might not be a bad idea to scan the statements and anything else you have that is relevant

and burn those to a cd

inc a covering letter regarding these and make ref to the PENALY charges that were levied too.

 

 

yes I would expect their 'std' redress figure to vary dependant upon the loan amount too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks DX.

 

I'm speaking to them today - they are to explain why their letter of 9th Jan didn't reach me. Neither did the last letter they sent in November!!!

 

They say the letter makes an offer of just short of £18k - this is across 8 products for my old business account.

 

 

They only have the records for the most recent 4.

 

 

I shall look out my spreadsheets for the whole period and see if the estimated figures look accurate or not!

 

I guess I need to add the principle PPI lumps, penalty charges levied and all interest charged on the two?

 

 

Then work out the interest that I could have received for the lump of money for the periods they fall into.

 

 

What rate of interest should I apply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'd have to consult your statements and threads here

 

 

link 1 gives you the scenario to follow.

 

 

don't forget the settlement lump sum from one to the other will tell the PPI carryover

you cant directly inc any interest sums paid

 

 

read the link

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I spoke to the bank this evening and the offer doesn't take penalty charges into account.

 

 

I have been told that would be a separate complaint - but would use the same ref number to connect the two.

 

Just scanning through statements the penalty charges alone are £12k plus.

That's only going back to 2001 at this stage.

 

 

There wouldn't be so many before this time as it was around 2005 that I struggled most.

 

 

I've not looked at the interest on this money.

 

 

The total charges for this period ('01-'09) were around £30 - that would also include legitimate charged items,

but by the time you take interest on MY money into account then I think I have a good case to argue.

 

I shall check the wording on the cheque they are sending for the PPI settlement to make sure it doesn't exclude me from further complaint.

 

What really upsets me in all this is that if I was that much money better off I'd still be in business.

 

 

I'm now doing my teacher training - best thing I've ever done though!

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting article. Makes me angry about all the sleepless nights stressing about it all......

 

Should I photocopy all the statements and send with a letter of complaint stating that the amount due should fall between the penalty charges (c£12k plus interest) and the total bank charges I paid for the period (£30k + interest)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure how you'd calc it nor them.

 

 

ideally one should use the fosrunning or the CIfos.

 

 

and post 7

 

 

I wouldn;t be expecting it to be between those figures ... you are guessing don't do that

calc it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well sorry for the delay in getting back.

 

I have had the cheques sent and these are now in my account.

 

 

Today I phoned the PPI dept about the penalty charges, associated interest etc etc.

I now have to lodge a complaint with the branch which I shall do tomorrow.

 

I have a list of all transactions on a spreadsheet.

There are about £7000 of penalty charges dating from about 1997 to 2010.

 

 

Also some charges for returned items.

 

 

I have about another 3 years of statements to look at - currently in the roof!

 

 

There is at least something to be said for keeping records longer than the required time!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following my visit to the local branch yesterday I had a call from their complaints department this afternoon. I discussed it with the chap and he now says I need to go back to the PPI department!

 

I have put all the charges and dates onto a spreadsheet dating back to 2001 ready to send them. Just another 6 years of business statements to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...